Here’s the answer of the Wall Street Journal’s Moscow bureau chief Anne M. Simmons to the question of what the strategic objective of Ukraine’s counter-attack in Russia was from a newsletter I received this morning:
“The Ukrainians took Russia by surprise and dealt an embarrassing blow to President Vladimir Putin. The incursion shifts the strategic dynamic of the conflict, in that it puts Russia on the back foot at a time when Moscow felt it was making gains, no matter how incremental. The Kremlin has had to divert resources away from the Ukrainian battlefield, which going forward, could stymie the goals of its offensive.
The land that Kyiv says it’s taken will provide President Volodymyr Zelensky with leverage in negotiations to regain Ukrainian territory that Moscow has illegally occupied, as will the hundreds of Russian troops Ukraine says it’s captured. These soldiers will help to bolster Kyiv’s pool of POWs who can be used for future prisoner exchanges with Moscow.
The fact that Ukrainian troops made such headway will be a morale boost for the Ukrainians and dent the self-assurance of Russia’s forces. It showcases Ukraine’s resolve, signaling to the countries backing Kyiv that their troops are in this fight for the long-haul. But don’t write off Russia just yet. It remains to be seen whether Kyiv’s forces have the ability to maintain their presence inside Russia given their limited manpower and stretched supply lines.”
I strongly suspect that the strategic objective Ukraine counter-attacking Russia was to shore up flagging Western support. Something of how effective it will be in achieving that depends on the Russian response.