How Incumbents Win Re-Election

I think you might find political consultant Louis Perron’s advice to the Biden campaign at RealClearPolitics interesting. Here’s a snippet:

On paper, and judging by official numbers and indicators, the economy is doing fine. Large parts of the electorate, however, do not feel the Bidenomics (yet). What should he do? Blow his own horn and propagate that the economy is doing well, or showcase how he feels the pain?

The answer depends on timing. The more time there is available, the more an incumbent should fight to change the public perception and mood. After all, an incumbent president or prime minister has a unique ability to affect the media. This, however, has to be done very carefully, in the right tone, and in sync with where people are emotionally at the current moment. For Joe Biden, the main opportunity to do this starts with the State of the Union speech, and the window of opportunity will close at the convention. After that, he will be left with step number four.

That is, vulnerable incumbents need to go on the counter-offense and rip apart the challenger. As different as they may be with respect to policy, this is the strategy by which George W. Bush and Barack Obama won reelection. The rationale goes like this: You may not like what you have, but at least you know what you have, and the alternative is a big risk, and it’s likely that things will get worse. In that respect, Donald Trump is a gift from heaven for Joe Biden, and it’s noteworthy to me that Biden purposely and consistently makes it a point to run against Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans.

I suspect that the Biden campaign will find some of his advice extremely difficult to accomplish, particularly his advice about mobilizing the base. The problem is that the interests of different components of President Biden’s base, e.g. white suburban college-educated voters and urban black voters, are diametrically opposed. IMO some of the base is expendable while some is not. So, for example, for President Biden I (along with Ruy Teixeira and John Judis) think that he doesn’t need to reach out to white suburban college-educated voters but does need to reach out to urban black voters. That is further complicated since those who contribute to or work in campaigns tend to come from the former group so it necessarily looms larger than it should.

8 comments… add one
  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    “You may not like what you have, but at least you know what you have, and the alternative is a big risk”

    Doesn’t that fail the basic reasoning test. Trump is unique in that he was President and has a record to point to. Like it or not, voters know what they are getting. As an example, the whole brouhaha about NATO was straight out of 2018.

    As I see it, this is the rare campaign which isn’t a referendum on the incumbent or the challenger. Voters will likely compare records.

    The truth is; as terrible as everyone throught Trump’s record was in 2021; Biden has done such lousy job that in many outcomes, it inconceivably is worse then Trump.

    Like the simplest campaign message Trump can say is, in my 4 years in office the cumulative inflation was 8%. Biden’s record is 18% and he has 11 months to go. What’s Biden’s attack, if you elect Trump he doesn’t know how to manage the economy and make things worse?

  • Andy Link

    It looks like the core of Biden’s campaign will probably be to run against Trump. That’s probably smart because opposition to Trump is the one thing that unites all of the various Democratic factions.

    The problem is that message probably won’t be as effective with the swing and marginal voters Biden will need to actually win in the relevant swing states.

  • Zachriel Link

    On the one hand, “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.” On the other hand, someone who says he will be dictator for a day and will encourage attacks on sovereign allies if they don’t pay up.

  • Drew Link

    I think Andy makes the correct point. But further….

    I hope Mr. Perron enjoys his home on Mars, where maybe the economy is doing fine, but he has missed the American on Earth experience quite significantly. Inflation, the statistical gimmickry aside, ticks along at about 5%. Wages don’t pace it. So we see credit cards absolutely maxed out now. At 20%. Wow. Wage depression from immigration. US taxpayer proceeds diverted due to immigration. Rents? Through the roof. (Heh) My Valentines Day card cost $9. The vast majority of the new jobs are 1) rebound, 2) low wage and 3) going to immigrants, not US citizens. I could go on.

    The economy isn’t good, and the American people know it.

  • Drew Link

    And I forgot to mention a key stat on consumer credit. The stock of savings has declined about 25% the past 4 years.

    The rubber band is stretched awfully tight.

  • steve Link

    “Inflation, the statistical gimmickry aside, ticks along at about 5%. Wages don’t pace it”

    Where does this received wisdom come from? May I make up numbers too?

    BTW, with most recent numbers I could find household debt is down quite a bit since January 2021.

    https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/united-states/household-debt–of-nominal-gdp#:~:text=in%20Sep%202023%3F-,United%20States%20household%20debt%20accounted%20for%2064.1%20%25%20of%20the%20country%27s,64.2%20%25%20in%20the%20previous%20quarter.

    Steve

  • The annualized CPI was 4.7% for 2021, 8% for 2022, and 4.1% for 2023.

    Real median household income has declined every year of Biden’s presidency.

  • Zachriel Link

    Here’s a more up-to-date analysis: The Purchasing Power of American Households

Leave a Comment