Do They Plan On Re-Litigating Double Jeopardy?

Donica Phifer and Avery Lotz report at Axios that Luigi Mangione has pled guilty:

Luigi Mangione pleaded guilty Friday in federal court to stalking charges tied to the 2024 killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, per multiple reports.

Why it matters: Mangione was facing a potential life sentence if convicted in a federal trial, and the guilty plea could mean his lawyers ask to dismiss separate state charges, including second-degree murder.

  • Mangione’s legal team has argued that charging him in both federal and state courts constituted double jeopardy, a legal protection that prevents a person from being charged twice for the same offense.

Frankly, that puzzles me or at least Axios’s description of the argument does. The federal constitutional issue was settled more than a century ago in United States v. Lanza and most recently reaffirmed in Gamble v. United States (2019): the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit successive state and federal prosecutions because they are separate sovereigns.

The actual issue appears to be different. New York’s Criminal Procedure Law §40.20 provides broader protection than the federal Constitution and generally prohibits successive prosecutions arising from the same criminal transaction, subject to several exceptions. Indeed, the judge in Mangione’s state case has already rejected his federal constitutional argument while noting that his New York statutory argument could become ripe after a federal guilty plea.

So the interesting question isn’t whether Mangione’s lawyers intend to relitigate Lanza. It’s whether his federal guilty plea now bars the New York murder prosecution under New York law.

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment