Schumer Pedals Back

And now Chuck Schumer is doing much what I said he should—he’s backpedaling on the remark of which I took note in an earlier post. The Washington Post reports:

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday that he misspoke when he said that two justices appointed by President Trump to the Supreme Court would “pay the price” for a vote against abortion rights, but he defended his passion on the issue, saying his anger reflected that of “women across America.”

Schumer’s remarks on the Senate floor came a day after his comments at a rally outside the Supreme Court prompted a rare rebuke of a sitting member of Congress by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who said in a statement that “threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous.”

“I should not have used the words I used yesterday. They didn’t come out the way I intended them to,” Schumer told Senate colleagues Thursday. “I’m from Brooklyn. We speak in strong language. I shouldn’t have used the words I did, but in no way was I making a threat. I never — never — would do such a thing.”

In case you think the pushback on the remarks is just coming from a bunch of Republicans, here’s Laurence Tribe’s reaction to Sen. Schumer’s original statement:

“These remarks by @SenSchumer were inexcusable,” he tweeted. “Chief Justice Roberts was right to call him on his comments. I hope the Senator, whom I’ve long admired and consider a friend, apologizes and takes back his implicit threat. It’s beneath him and his office.”

I think that what happened was a Kinsley gaffe—Sen. Schumer got carried away in the moment and said what he really thinks.

At any rate I hope this is the end of the matter but I fear it won’t be. As I have pointed out many times before highly agonistic speech is to be expected in this era of video communications. It’s both effective and affective. Social media influencers are not long form journalists.

8 comments… add one
  • Jan Link

    Schumer, because of his democrat affiliation, will be quickly forgiven. If this had been a Republican from Brooklyn, he would be first intensely grilled & then probably asked to resign his office in shame.

  • steve Link

    So he did what I predicted. He has no history of threatening people. He was guilty of trying to be too clever. He admitted he was wrong. Would be nice if other politicians would admit when they have been wrong. If a Republican had done this they would never apologize and they would be a champion of the right. Remember the congressman out west who hit the reporter? Instant hero. Trump doing essentially the same thing to reporters who attended his rallies? He gets adulation.

    I am sure Republicans forget this.

    “The controversial move was appealing to President Donald Trump, apparently. He praised Gianforte at a rally on Thursday, saying, “Any guy who can do a body slam, he is my type!”

    So to be clear once again, since Republicans dont do nuance, what Schumer did was wrong. He should have apologized. He did. There is no evidence he has a history of doing this stuff and no evidence he really was threatening harm. Even Trump always gets a chance to explain what he meant when he says awful stuff, but he just doubles down and his culties defend him.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/happened-republican-greg-gianforte-body-slammed-reporter/story?id=58610691

    Steve

  • TarsTarkas Link

    Hell, a Republican Senator making a similar threat to any of the Lockstep Four would be indicted for making terroristic threats, be censored and/or removed forcibly from Congress, and receive multiple death threats. So would his or her family.

    BTW abortion kills more girls than boys. Not just in the US but worldwide. The ratio in the US is 105/100 girls/boys. It’s has high as 115/100 in other nations (China, infamous for it, is 110/100). Therefore by definition abortion can be considered as having a disparate impact on women. Think about that. Abortion is murdeorusly misogynistic. Why are so many women supporting the destruction of their future daughters and sisters in the name of equal ‘rights?’

    https://www.thoughtco.com/sex-ratio-and-population-1435470

    IMO follow the money regarding the hysteria supporting abortion. There’s a lot of money being made in the trade. Money that comes from you and me and the fellow behind the tree. I’m all for birth control, and even morning after pills. There’s nothing that can’t be made worse with surgery, and many abortions involve surgery. But don’t insist’s that all about freedom and women’s rights when more girls than boys are dying from it. It’s a defense of unrestrained unprotected promiscuity, and promiscuity does women no favors.

  • Guarneri Link

    Thanks for the sanity, Tars.

    steve = the usual suspects

  • GreyShambler Link

    After a lifetime of feeling the public pulse and reading constituents’ feedback so they can ride the crest of public opinion to another election win, these guys start to love the crowd adulation so much they begin to believe their own bullshit. That is, they begin to see in the mirror what they imagine the crowd sees when they cheer at the lines they deliver which were fed to them by the crowd and public opinion polls in the first place.
    So Chuck got carried away with the feedback loop until he was (momentarily) ready to advocate violence against SCOTUS members he named. Shame, shame.
    I have to say without knowing him, his overreach was not about women’s reproductive rights so much as the dopamine rush he gets when the crowd reacts to his comment, much the same as the role of a stand up comedian.

  • GreyShambler Link

    And since the thread turned to abortion. I believe if you like to raise children and willing to put in the time and effort and enthusiasm…. have all you want. But the sad fact is our prisons are overflowing with people not raised by unprepared or addicted parents who only got in the family way because they were high or drunk and horny.
    I have no idea what the carrying capacity of the earth is. Depends on technological development.
    I hate abortion, full stop, period.
    Adoption will never fill the need for parents.
    The government only feeds the children’s bodies.
    Planned parenthood is a for profit-non-profit like PETA, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts.
    My ideology is this: Children born to those in my home are family, they are welcome here and I will help raise them till I die.
    Children born/not born, into your home, are your business. Not mine.

  • jan Link

    A minority leader of the Senate, attending a protest rally in front of the Supreme Court, loudly voicing a threat in the vein of “watch your back,” to 2 specifically named justices of that court, is compared to a congressional candidate body slamming an obnoxious reporter, is now deemed a moral equivalent by Steve. BTW, that angry candidate also extended an apology to that obnoxious reporter, which was far more heart-felt than the one given by Schumer.

    At the very least, Schumer should be censored. At the higher end of the punishment spectrum, he should be replaced as Senate minority leader.

  • steve Link

    Oddly enough, I do think actual violence is worse that saying something that might be construed by some crazy person as an incitement to violence. Yes, actual violence is worse. However, I really cited this to show the reactions by the different parties. Criticisms from the left were the norm with many people asking, as I did for an apology and an explanation. But when a Republican engages in real violence, the leader of the GOP praises that person. Beat up someone who is seen as liberal and the POTUS will hold you up as a hero.

    Steve

Leave a Comment