Why Don’t Democrats Defuse Their Political Opponents?

After noting that a) a significant percentage of voter don’t like either Trump or Biden and b) Democrats have some serious problems in winning over those voters, Ruy Teixeira observes:

Certainly Democrats can point to issues like abortion where Democrats do have an advantage, even with the swing group discussed here. But perhaps they should consider a Plan B, where the success of the Bidenomics pitch is not assumed and compromise is not anathematized. As I have argued previously, Democrats have generally dealt with culturally-freighted issues by some combination of ignore (change the subject) and attack (our opponents are hateful bigots who want to roast the planet). The latter now seems like the preferred Democratic approach. But there is a third way, if you will, that would fit nicely into a Plan B.

That approach is to defuse. This means moving aggressively to neutralize vulnerabilities in cultural areas by (a) dissociating the party from extreme positions in their own ranks; and (b) embracing a common-sense approach to these issues which typically aligns well with both Democratic values and public opinion.

Why, indeed? I’ve already provided my answer: the party leadership actually supports all of those “culturally freighted” ideas. They can’t defuse the situation without defenestrating themselves.

5 comments… add one
  • steve Link

    I would hope it would help if they moderated on some issues, but there isn’t a lot of evidence it would help now. Probably helped Clinton but that was another time. They keep winning the popular vote but losing in the electoral college. Trump showed that you could win an election taking maximally radical positions and behaving as badly as possible towards the opposition.

    Anyway, I would like to see moderation on a number of issues but there isn’t much evidence it will change much but it might. The population of persuadable is tiny but real so who knows. (I think the population of persuadable is much, much smaller than the population of the not interested.)

    Steve

  • Drew Link

    “Trump showed that you could win an election taking maximally radical positions…”

    Yes, I think we can all agree that make America great again, enforcing borders and immigration laws and energy independence are truly radical – indeed, horrible – positions. I’ve always said, we need more porous borders to feed the pedophilia trade. And what’s a 20% loss in purchasing power between friends?

  • Grey Shambler Link

    It is dishonest to paint Trump as radical and extreme, he is many things, arrogant, self centered, abrasive, unyielding, but not radical.
    This reminds me of the Rodney King beating, every defensive move he makes gets him into a new indictment.
    After he was sworn in as president he met with James Comey who jotted down a transcript of the conversation.
    Hell, he should have been mirandized, what a nest of jackals.

  • steve Link

    Firmly ensconced in the cult it just wouldn’t occur to you that Trump said things and behaved so far out fo accepted norms that people felt like they had to take notes.

    Steve

  • Grey Shambler Link

    Like Alonzo says in “Training Day”,
    Washington was not Trump’s town, it doesn’t operate like NY.

Leave a Comment