What Were the Greatest “Breakthroughs”?

There’s an interesting article by James Fallows of The Atlantic on the fifty greatest “breakthroughs” of all time that you might want to take a look at. Many of those in the list are obvious: the lever, the printing press, penicillin. Some are slightly less so: paper, the Pill.

Most I’d agree with but some I’d argue with. For example, I think the personal computer is too obvious a development. I’m not convinced that gunpowder is so major a “breakthrough”. And I don’t think the people who compiled the list understand why the Internet is a breakthrough. It’s not the Internet (which is just a set of protocols). It’s that the protocols of which the Internet consists are not proprietary. I wouldn’t have included it in the list.

There are some breakthroughs I think they missed. So, for example, modern commerce would be impossible without double-entry bookkeeping. It dates from the 14th century. If you include the compass and the sextant among great breakthroughs, I don’t know how you can omit the marine chronometer. The compass tells you what direction you’re moving in and the sextant can tell you where you are relative to the equator but the marine chronometer made precision navigation possible. It’s the basis of longitude.

I also think that, if you include the telegraph, the telephone, photography, radio, and television in the list, the phonograph is a notable omission. It was the first method of recording from life. Photography just records a single, static image—that’s not what I mean by “from life”. Prior to photography there were ways of telling what people, animals, buildings, etc. looked like in the past. Prior to the phonograph there was no way to know what people sounded like. That’s a real breakthrough.

Any other suggestions for the list?

Update

I’ve thought of a few more. The Jacquard loom was at least as influential as the steam engine or the digital computer. Mass production with interchangeable parts was introduced by Josiah Wedgwood in the 18th century as was the assembly line (which is on their list). Distillation is at least 2,000 years old and is used in all sorts of industrial processes (not to mention in making brandy).

22 comments… add one
  • bob sykes Link

    Several years ago, a group of engineering societies listed refrigeration as one of the top inventions of all time.

  • bob sykes Link
  • That’s in their list. So is air conditioning.

  • ... Link

    Sweet Jesus, no mention of Newton! WTF kind of list of innovations misses the calculus and Newtonian physics? They’re not physical inventions but methodologies for precise thought, which is even more important.

  • I agree. The calculus certainly qualifies, is novel, and completely central.

  • Something interesting to note. Generally, their “breakthroughs” are elaborations on existing technology. Most of mine are novel innovations in processes. Your suggestion of the calculus is a novel way of thinking.

  • ... Link

    Others that could go on the list: Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection, Mendel’s laws of inheritance and the synthesis of the two. Did they list the transistor? If not they should have. And good luck making that without QM.

    I had some other thing in mind and it slipped my mind typing on this phone. Grr.

  • ... Link

    Galton’s work on statistics was the other thing. Galton might be the second most useful human who ever lived, after Newton.

  • sam Link

    Shouldn’t we mention geometry, trigonometry and algebra, too? Especially algebra.

  • ... Link

    I don’t remember their list, but algebra, trig & geometry don’t have particular points where you can say, “Ah, here it is!” The dame could be said of QM. Calculus, Newtonian physics and Galton’s work with statistics have a definite genesis. Lots of people and peoples worked out various bits of A, G & T independently.

  • sam Link

    I don’t remember their list, but algebra, trig & geometry don’t have particular points where you can say, “Ah, here it is!”

    Is that important? I mean, the fact that no particular person can be credited with the “innovation” does not make it any the less an innovation, does it? Who mastered fire, invented the wheel, or said to his buddy, “You know, I’m damned tired of all this roaming around. Why don’t we stick some of these little whatchamacallits in the ground and hang around and see what happens?”? In any event,

    The word “algebra” is derived from the Arabic word Al-Jabr, and this comes from the treatise written in 820 by the medieval Persian mathematician, Muhammad ibn MÅ«sā al-KhwārizmÄ«, entitled, in Arabic Kitāb al-muḫtaá¹£ar fÄ« ḥisāb al-ÄŸabr wa-l-muqābala, which can be translated as The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing. The treatise provided for the systematic solution of linear and quadratic equations.

    History of algebra

  • ... Link

    Sam, It might be important for the way they put their list together. If not, then I agree with your prior comment.

  • sam Link

    And besides, there’s that dustup between Liebniz and Newton as to who really created the calculus. See, Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy.

  • sam Link

    Yeah, …, I think you’re right — we’d have to consider how they put the list together.

  • ... Link

    Independent discovery, but Newton was first, and invented a bunch of new physics to boot. Leibniz had better notation though. Regardless, the thing itself was invented by someone at a particular point in time.

  • Red Barchetta Link

    Blues music.

  • sam Link

    I notice toilet paper is not on the list. Probably invented by the Chinese. And that omission reminded me of these two passages.

    Master Tung-kuo asked Chuang Tzu, “This thing called the Tao-where does it exist?”
    Chuang Tzu said, “There’s no place it doesn’t exist.”
    “Come,” said Master Tung-kuo, “you must be more specific!”
    “It is in the ant.”
    “As low a thing as that?”
    “It is in the panic grass.”
    “But that’s lower still!”
    “It is in the tiles and shards.”
    “How can it be so low?”
    “It is in the piss and shit!”

    The Book of Chuang Tzu.

    Socrates, [Parmenides] said, I admire the bent of your mind towards philosophy; tell me now, was this your own distinction between Forms in themselves and the things which partake of them? and do you think that there is an Form of likeness apart from the likeness which we possess, and of the one and many, and of the other things which Zeno mentioned?

    I think that there are such Forms, said Socrates.

    Parmenides proceeded: And would you also make absolute Forms of the just and the beautiful and the good, and of all that class?

    Yes, he said, I should.

    And would you make an Form of man apart from us and from all other human creatures, or of fire and water?

    I am often undecided, Parmenides, as to whether I ought to include them or not.

    And would you feel equally undecided, Socrates, about things of which the mention may provoke a smile?-I mean such things as hair, mud, dirt, or anything else which is vile and paltry; would you suppose that each of these has an Form distinct from the actual objects with which we come into contact, or not?

    Certainly not, said Socrates; visible things like these are such as they appear to us, and I am afraid that there would be an absurdity in assuming any Form of them, although I sometimes get disturbed, and begin to think that there is nothing without an Form; but then again, when I have taken up this position, I run away, because I am afraid that I may fall into a bottomless pit of nonsense, and perish; and so I return to the Forms of which I was just now speaking, and occupy myself with them.

    Plato, Parmenides, 130 b-d

  • steve Link

    Bessemer process.

    Steve

  • That’s in their list.

  • Modulo Myself Link

    Anesthetics
    Costumes
    Formalized memorization

  • TastyBits Link

    Zero and horse collar

  • Lee Link

    Another thing about the Jaquard loom is that it is credited with being the precursor to computers.

Leave a Comment