Waste, Fraud, and Abuse

At RealClearPolitics Thomas W. Smith and Adam Andrzejewski of OpentheBooks.com catalog some of the excessive wages and expenses being paid to public employees in California, New York, Illinois, and Washington DC. Here’s Illinois’s reckoning:

In the Land of Lincoln, a place where a young store clerk and future president once walked three miles to return six cents change to a woman he’d inadvertently overcharged, some 110,000 public employees are paid salaries or pensions in excess of $100,000. Under the Democrats’ plan, Illinois will reap $20 billion in bailout money. Despite launching the political career of “Honest Abe,” in our time Illinois is a cesspool of corruption. As a consequence of its Faustian bargain with public employee unions, the financially strapped state is flirting with junk bond status.

There, in the American heartland, Chicago’s city-employed tree trimmers make $106,663 and state correctional facility nurses take home up to $277,100. Higher education is a particularly lucrative endeavor of public service: Illinois community college presidents get nearly half-a-million dollars a year, while university doctors are compensated at packages ranging up to $2 million annually. At the state’s signature public university, the head football coach is paid $4 million – for fielding a losing team.

Thanks to such largesse, every man, woman, and child in Illinois owes $19,000 of the estimated $251 billion pension liability. An Illinois family of four now owes more in unfunded pension liabilities ($76,000) than they earn in household income ($63,585).

And rising since Illinois’s population is declining faster than that of any other state.

There are several problems with these expenses. The first is that the pensions are undoubtedly defined benefit systems, something found unaffordable in the private sector decades ago. They should have been converted to defined contribution plans long ago. The second is that the funds from which the pensions are paid are underfunded—the states aren’t making the contributions as they should. I also strongly suspect that some of the larger pensions are a result of a practice called “double-dipping”, collecting two distinct outsized public pensions piled on top of one another, a practice that should be prohibited by law.

Finally, the issue highlighted by the piece itself: the second so-called “stimulus” package will backstop the ability of these states to continue their outrageous and corrupt practices. They need reforms not subsidies.

4 comments… add one
  • steve Link

    I have long agreed with you the they should change to a defined contribution system. I also support transparency in public salaries (actually in general it is a good idea in the public sector). When Ed Rendell was mayor of Philly he had a dispute with the unions over pay, so he got the Inquirer to publish the pay of city workers and they ran a series of articles on how the unions were very abusive in workin the system for pay. Took something like 7 people from different unions to change a light bulb at the airport. The unions instantly lost public support and did not get their big raise.

    That said, I am betting the the people of Illinois are as crazy as everyone else and are OK with their football coach making $4 million a year. They just want a winning record.

    Steve

  • Grey Shambler Link

    It’s GOOD, to be in with the in crowd.
    People have very little influence on elected official’s spending, especially in the middle of a crisis, any old crisis will do.
    I have here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers a letter from Central States Pension Fund, urging me to call my representatives and beg for our $30,000 pension to be backfilled before it dies. But I’ve been that route. They have friendly, highly trained staffers to run interference and politely listen and emote until you run out of words. Then wish you well and forget the whole call.
    The people the article describes are the 10%. I don’t know if they deserve what they get, I don’t know if I deserve anything at all. You get what you can when your’e young and endure when you are old.
    One thing I’d like to end is the practice of calling these public elites “servants”. I think I’ll strenuously object to that every time.
    Public Payroll Padders maybe. But then that’s just dumb.

  • I don’t have a problem with public employees receiving market rate salaries. I do have a problem with public employees receiving market price multiple salaries and getting pensions about which non-public employees can only dream.

    I also realize it’s a bit more complicated than that. For example, “market rate” can be difficult to determine; invidious comparisons are nearly the norm in talking about wages. The reality is that people who graduate from top tier law schools and work for top law firms are going to be paid more than grads of Thomas Cooley (frequently characterized as the worst law school in the country) working as public defenders. The notion of comparable worth is also absurd—things just don’t work that way.

  • TarsTarkas Link

    ‘One thing I’d like to end is the practice of calling these public elites “servants”.’

    We are THEIR servants, and don’t you forget it, you deplorable you.

    True story of mine: A few years ago one of our mechanics went down to the Philly Housing Authority to fix a truck of theirs. While he was working on it the garage mechanics were sitting around bitching about their boss and how hard their job was. Our guy came back and related the story and just shook his head. This story could likely be duplicated millions of times across the country.

Leave a Comment