Walk a Few More Blocks Together

I liked this post at Time by Peter T. Coleman. Here’s the setup:

Early this summer, I emailed a neighbor of mine, whom we’ll call David, and asked him to go for a walk with me in the park. Although we had lived in the same building on the Upper West Side of Manhattan for more than a decade, we had previously only shared pleasantries with one another in the elevator. But this neighbor’s political views diametrically opposed my own. Given the dire, toxic, runaway path to civil war our nation is currently on, and as a professed conflict mediator, bipartisan bridge builder, and depolarization pundit, I felt it incumbent on me to reach out and try my best to walk my talk. My spouse also talked me into doing it.

I thought my decades of training as a conflict resolution scholar and mediator of difficult moral disputes prepared me for just such encounters. But I spent most of the hour before our date in distress in my bathroom.

When I greeted David in front of our building, he also appeared ill-at-ease. Nevertheless, we headed toward the park for a brief jaunt, anxiety in tow.

On our way, we chit-chatted about our families, and then I explained to him my reason for reaching out. I said that I was increasingly worried about the political divisions in our country and the growing odds of extreme political violence. I was doing my utmost to better understand different perspectives on the situation. He replied, “You mean, you don’t know any Republicans you can talk to.” When I hesitated, he added, “Any Republicans that like Trump, that is.”

“That’s about right,” I admitted.

Nominally, the piece is about how we can avoid a civil war in the United States.

I don’t think we’re going to have a civil war in the sense of pitched battles of organized troops. I do think that things are going to become increasingly stressful and, to crib a word from an earlier post, chaotic. More like Mogadishu than Gettysburg.

My prescription would be a little different than Mr. Coleman’s. I’d recommend three steps:

  • Listen more and talk less.
  • Respect each other.
  • Look for points of agreement.

One more suggestion from basic optimization theory. Pick one stressor and reduce it. It might not be the most significant stressor. Picking the easiest might be the most worthwhile. Each reduction in stress will make the next step easier. We’ve been doing the opposite for the last 50 years.

6 comments… add one
  • bob sykes Link

    In 1860, most of the military power in the US was the State militias. That was largely true throughout the war. Nowadays, the States have no military power, even the National Guard is controlled by the federal government. So, a new civil war cannot repeat the first. More likely, a new civil war would be mutual assassinations, road-side bombing, IED’s, and opposed small guerrilla bands hunting each other.

    Of course, the US military will be on the side of the government. But the US military has a long, often sordid, record of failure in anti-guerrilla wars: Viet Nam, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen… The odds are a guerrilla war in the US would fester for decades.

    The US is a target-rich environment. Hundreds of thousands would be killed, and much of infrastructure would be destroyed. We would cease to be a world power.

    The biggest loss would be our civil liberties: there would be none. The incumbents in Washington would likely suspend elections indefinitly.

    No one should want a civil war.

  • steve Link

    We talk politics pretty freely on my leadership team but we have known each other for years. There are some rules. You can make any joke you want about a Dem when they are president but no jokes about Trump. The avid Trumpers got upset. OK to joke about Biden again.

    With people Idont know well? There are no common set of facts to use, especially numbers. I cant find a data set Trumpers will accept. Makes it hard. Also dont know how to get around the conspiracy stuff. I am not that optimistic.

    Steve

  • Rick Link

    Steve,

    You don’t think your insulting characterization by the use of the term “Trumper” possibly poisons your ability to be even handed?

  • steve Link

    Meh. Mostly just a contraction for Trump supporter. I am not a good typist. I suppose it has been used negatively but Think MAGAt is more commonly used, besides which when talking with people you dont generally use those terms. No common facts is for me a much bigger deal. Even when I know that Trumpers have used the same sources I want to use in the past to support stuff they want to believe. Talking covid for example is just awful as it is clear most of them have no background in reading research or experience in statistical analysis, although to be fair that is true of most people.

    Steve

  • Andy Link

    Mogadishu specifically, and Somalia generally, is divided primarily by clan and ethnicity. If we have a civil war it will be more like Spain, which was divided by class and ideology.

    The current talk of civil war seems to be yet another example of elite panic.

  • Grey Shambler Link

    I recently viewed Neil Oliver’s documentary:
    “Who put the Klan in the Ku Klux Klan”
    Explained a lot.
    I cannot remember a dominant culture, utilizing slave labor, forced not by the slaves, but an outside force, to not only free their slaves, but to share power with them.
    All throughout human history, if the slaves were freed, they either left, or exterminated their enslavers, seizing power.
    In the case of the civil war, didn’t happen, an outside power forced the enslaved and the enslavers to live cheek to jowls .
    Under the rules of a democratic system, what in the hell did the government expect to happen?
    I believe that Lincoln anticipated this, but we will never know what he would have done differently.

Leave a Comment