The Limits of Control

There is a story that goes back a millennium about how King Canute commanded that his throne be brought to the seashore where the king commanded the tide to halt so as not to wet his feet and robes, knowing full well commanding the elements was beyond his power:

“Might I stay the sun above us, good sir Bishop?” Canute cried;
“Could I bid the silver moon to pause upon her heavenly ride?
If the moon obeys my orders, sure I can command the tide.

“Will the advancing waves obey me, Bishop, if I make the sign?”
Said the Bishop, bowing lowly, “Land and sea, my lord, are thine.”
Canute turned towards the ocean–“Back!” he said, “thou foaming brine.

“From the sacred shore I stand on, I command thee to retreat;
Venture not, thou stormy rebel, to approach thy master’s seat:
Ocean, be thou still! I bid thee come not nearer to my feet!”

But the sullen ocean answered with a louder, deeper roar,
And the rapid waves drew nearer, falling sounding on the shore;
Back the Keeper and the Bishop, back the king and courtiers bore.

And he sternly bade them never more to kneel to human clay,
But alone to praise and worship That which earth and seas obey:
And his golden crown of empire never wore he from that day.
King Canute is dead and gone: Parasites exist alway.

I am frequently baffled that people don’t understand how limited government is. Wouldn’t it be great if everyone earned at least $30,000 per year? Sure it would but you can’t mandate it. If you did here’s what would happen:

  • Some people would be better off
  • Some people would lose their jobs
  • Some businesses would go out of business and all of their erstwhile employees would lose their jobs
  • Other businesses would invest in equipment to make it possible for them to get rid of more of their employees

or, as Amazon has recently learned, it would not only ensure that its employees earning less than $30,000 per year got that but it would make its employees who are already earning $30,000 per year unhappy that they were being paid at the same rate as people who used to earn less.

Or it might have the results that Jim Epstein points out at Reason.com—it might produce a black market:

“We used to do the same thing with 25 people, and now I’m doing it with two,” says Belinsky.

By making cheap labor illegal, the $15 minimum wage made it possible for Belinsky to downgrade his service. “Before if I go exterior, my competition would say, ‘ah, he went exterior and I’m still full-service so I’ll take all his customers,'” Belinsky says. “That never gave me a chance to go exterior. Now everybody is forced to go exterior because of this crazy law and the minimum wage $15 per hour. It evened out the field.”

“These workers have few options and little power, RWDSU President Stuart Applebaum said in his December 2014 speech. “They live in the shadows.”

The irony is that progressives have pushed the car wash workers further into the shadows.

The $15 minimum wage amounts to government prohibition of low-wage work. And yet just making something illegal won’t stop able-bodied men with few alternatives from meeting a market demand for their services.

Since many legitimate car washes can no longer hire them, workers are going to the streets, where it’s all cash, no tax, no unions, no workers comp, no insurance, and certainly no wage floors.

“The economy has led us to this situation to have to work washing cars in the street,” says Fausto, an illegal car wash worker who asked that we only use his first name. He’s part of a three-man operation washing cars on the curb out of a van for about $15 a pop.

We don’t need a $15 per hour minimum wage. We need more jobs that pay more than minimum wage and more workers who are capable of filling jobs that pay more than minimum wage. Some of that can be accomplished with training if the workers are trained in the right skills. But some of it means that we need to control immigration.

6 comments… add one
  • Jan Link

    Your summation is succinct and spot-on. However, this country appears to indulge more in political advancement, rather than applying reason to implementing better big picture economics. I really don’t know how such a trend can be curtailed, especially with the acceleration of divisive identity politics that seems to be the leading edge tool employed by the current democrat party.

  • Andy Link

    We know some people who’ve done Amazon’s Camperforce:

    http://www.amazondelivers.jobs/about/camperforce/

    As the webpage now notes, all positions will be a minimum of $15/hour starting next month.

  • Gustopher Link

    If the minimum wage had kept pace with inflation, it would be roughly $15 now. By letting it fall, we created a situation where people can work forty hours a week, and still be unable to afford a lot of the necessities of life — they qualify for food stamps, Medicaid, rental subsidies, etc.

    We are subsidizing companies that depend on low wages to make the bottom line, by making it possible for people to hold those jobs.

    I don’t think we should necessarily raise it Willy-nilly without considering all the consequences, but we should be thinking about how we want our working poor to live, and be regulating and legislating to get to that level.

    Do we want them dependent on the state for handouts? I don’t think we do. I also don’t think we should just cut the supports out from under them.

    Do we value the companies that depend on not paying a living wage? I’m less sure on this, but I think we might. Some businesses are much more able to absorb an increased labor cost than others.

    Maybe the right answer isn’t to raise the minumum wage, per say, but to adjust the payroll taxes to promote a higher wage (possibly to the point where the government is effectively paying the difference between $8/hr and $15/hr), and putting people in a spot where they don’t have to depend upon government services (which means less money needs to be taken in in taxes). Shift the subsidy around.

    More jobs that require moderate level of skills and pay better would be great. But, it doesn’t solve the problem of the working class poor.

    And, as Jesus said in Jesus Christ Superstar, “the poor will always be with us”

  • You might want to take a look at this report from the Urban Institute. Immigrants comprise a disproportionate number of those with low incomes. Native-born blacks and whites comprise a percentage of the low income disproportionately low relative to their numbers in the population.

  • Gustopher Link

    Mr. Dave — Assuming the Urban Institute’s data is correct: “Immigrants are 11 percent of all U.S. residents, but 14 percent of all workers and 20 percent of low-wage workers”

    They are about 1.5 (20/14) times as likely to be low income, and 80% of low income workers are natives.

    I wouldn’t build policy around them, at least not to the extent that it changes policy for everyone. I’m not even sure why you bring this up, but you’ve always been quick to look at race as a reason for things (not in a deeply racist way, more of the casual racist way that we all fall into)

    Immigrants do a lot of jobs Native Born Americans won’t. From farm labor, to janitorial work, to driving taxis to running 7-11s — all fine jobs, and hard work that we shouldn’t look down on. We depend on this work. It should pay a living wage.

    And 80% of the working poor is native born. And the working poor are generally better (for society, and for sitting next to in a bar) than the non-working poor. So, I have no idea what to make of your comment.

    (Yeah, I tossed in the 7-11s just to be racist… I know there are times when I realize I am assuming some pattern for racist reasons, but I can’t come up with a relavent one. Racism gets ingrained early, and the mark of a good man isn’t to not be biased (impossible), but to step back and reassess)

    (Oh, god, Doctor Who with a female Doctor is insane. She does all sorts of things that would pass without notice with any of the previous 12 male Doctors, but which startle you when a woman does it. I don’t like it. I don’t like her Doctor. I’m not sure I can separate the two things yet, but not every Doctor is going to be my favorite)

  • Andy Link

    “If the minimum wage had kept pace with inflation, it would be roughly $15 now. By letting it fall, we created a situation where people can work forty hours a week, and still be unable to afford a lot of the necessities of life — they qualify for food stamps, Medicaid, rental subsidies, etc.”

    When I was 16 and got my first (minimum wage) at $3.25 an hour. After three years I was up to about $3.80 an hour. This was at the discount retailer TJ Maxx. At $3.80 an hour, the store manager could not afford for me to work Sundays (time-and-a-half) because the labor budget was so tight. $3.25 an hour is the equivalent of about $7.50 an hour and $3.80 is about $9/hour today. I was there longer than most – most employees were teens or retirees. A few came in and then went up the management track (ironically, store managers were salaried employees who made less on a per hour basis than I did). The store I worked in, located in atypical middle-class suburban mall complex, was barely squeaking by. If Colorado had doubled the minimum wage I’m pretty sure they would have just closed the store.

    So, I think a lot depends on what people want the minimum wage to do and what effects a significant increase would have. I’m skeptical of demands that it now must be a “living wage”. Here are the problems I see with it:

    – There is no way to accurately assess what a “living wage” is. It varies considerably across individuals and families. What standard are you going to use? The single twenty-something living in his parent’s house with few expenses? Or a middle-aged single parent with five kids and a mountain of debt?

    – It will price out youth employment opportunities which I think is critical to introducing our youth to employment and job skills. I’m still thankful for all the important skills I learned at that first job.

    -It will cause problems for the labor market that may prove to be counterproductive to the goal of trying to make the minimum wage a “living” wage.

Leave a Comment