I’ve encountered a number of pieces in which the authors wrote that LLM AI never disagreed with them. That puzzles me.
I occasionally use ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Gemini. They’ve all disagreed with me at one time or another. When I have remonstrated with them they occasionally back down, particularly when I point out the logical flaws in their statements. Even more occasionally they’ve been flatly wrong. When I point that out, they’ve acknowledged that.
One of the great things about contradicting an LLM AI model is that I can do so harshly without worrying about its feelings.
I don’t think the proper lesson from this is that the models aren’t useful. It’s that they are easy to misuse.
