New Businesses = New Jobs

Economist Thomas Cooley’s prescription for job creation is fostering an environment in which new businesses are more likely to be started:

What all of this makes clear is that policies designed to create new jobs in the economy should be directed at encouraging new firms. What policies are those? Perhaps the most important issue for new and young businesses is financing. Access to credit markets is critical. When credit markets seized up in 2008 it was a dire period for many small and nascent firms. Lending to small business has declined a lot in 2009 but there are conflicting reports about why. Many small businesses claim it is hard to get credit but many lenders claim the demand isn’t there.

The administration’s policies do seem to be focused on increasing the access to financing for small firms. At the same time, however, they have created some very large sources of uncertainty that impact small businesses and those who would finance them. By pursuing a huge policy agenda without much success they have created large-scale uncertainty about health care costs, cap-and-trade policies, corporate taxes, taxes on incomes over $250,000 and estate taxes. At the same time they have been very slow to get through regulatory reforms that would provide us with a more stable financial system in the future. All of this is a huge deterrent to job creation and to the smooth functioning of our normally fluid labor market.

Basically, he’s giving the same advice that I have for some time: heal the financial sector and create a stable regulatory and tax environment.

Sometimes it’s amazing to me that the most obvious things are sometimes those most in need of pointing out. Nobody starts a multi-million dollar business let alone a multi-billion dollar one. Although it is the businesses growing from start-ups with no revenue to a few millions in revenue to more that are most likely to create new jobs, those aren’t the ones that will be at the center of government policy. Established business are the ones with visibility, contacts, and lobbyists and they will inevitably be the primary beneficiaries of policy. Consider, for example, that of the trillions in subsidies that have gone to banks over the last two and a half years all but a pittance has been showered upon a handful of very, very large banks.

Big government promotes big businesses and big businesses primarily do business with each other. Don’t expect a jobs policy that actually creates jobs to be molded from that clay.

An effective jobs policy can’t be as direct as an industrial policy. It must rely on indirect means, creating an environment in which small businesses can be started and thrive and small banks are able to serve them.

6 comments… add one
  • Drew Link

    Increasing the capital gains tax rate seems an awfully strange way to encourage capital formation.

  • steve Link

    In between cases yesterday (or was it Thursday?), CNBC was on. A couple of guys claiming to represent small business were on. They claimed that getting loans was not the issue, but rather that no one is buying.

    Steve

  • Drew Link

    steve –

    Like anything in life, reality is more complicated than soundbites. Most bank’s balance sheets are not yet repaired. Hence, they are not making relatively risky loans. From applicants so denied you will here: “the banks aren’t lending.” In particular, these are the troubled refi applicants. Expect much more of this in the next 18 months, especially from CRE.

    On the otherhand, from relatively high quality potential creditors, you will not hear many complaints that the banks won’t lend, but rather that they are not in a mood to debt finance expansion given market and political uncertainty. Unlike the potential borrowers in the previous paragraph, these borrowers inclinations could be changed, if the current Congress and Administration could be pursuaded to convincingly stop their current Lenin imitations.

  • steve Link

    Drew- Exactly. What I read and hear, suggests that those who probably should not be getting loans are not. Those qualified can. The latter group does not see any business out there, so they are not borrowing or expanding.

    The people I worry about are people starting the small businesses. The guy with the idea for a new product. He may or may not be a risky loan depending on many factors, including his savings. Given that Americans stopped saving because their houses were appreciating (this was ok according to arguments made by supply siders) it seems likely to me that we have quashed these folks from starting out. Then, add in medical issues. Only the entirely healthy can risk starting a small business without major qualms.

    Steve

  • Drew Link

    steve-

    “The guy with the idea for a new product. He may or may not be a risky loan depending on many factors, including his savings.”

    If its a new business, as well as a new product, he won’t get a loan, unless he want’s to totally collateralize it. Rare. Its time to call me – your friendly private equity guy.

    But team Obama wants to put new taxes on me. Stupid. Ideologically appealing, but stupid.

  • steve Link

    Why did you work in the 1990s when taxes were higher?

    Steve

Leave a Comment