It’s the Prices, Stupid—Revisited

Kaiser Health News notes that a new study by the Health Care Cost Institute has produced some interesting findings:

Higher prices charged by hospitals, outpatient centers and other providers drove up health care spending at double the rate of inflation during the economic downturn– even as patients consumed less medical care overall, according to a new study.

Prices rose at least five times faster than overall inflation for emergency room visits, outpatient surgery and facility-based mental health and substance abuse care from 2009 to 2010, says the report by the Health Care Cost Institute, a nonpartisan research group funded by insurers. Prices declined in only one category: nursing home care, which saw a 3.2 percent drop in the cost per admission.

One of the areas with the fastest growing spending, meanwhile, was children’s medical care.

“The story really does seem to be prices,” said Martin Gaynor, chair of the institute’s governing board and a health care economist at Carnegie Mellon University.

Representing one of the broadest looks at actual claim payments made by insurers, the study’s findings raise questions that go to the heart of the nation’s $2.6 trillion annual bill for health care: Why are prices for medical services rising far faster than inflation? Is a rapid increase in spending on children an anomaly, or a long-term trend with major implications for future costs?

“If you don’t know what the cause is, you don’t know what the right policy lever is (for a solution),” Gaynor says

Besides the rapid rise in the cost of children’s medical care there are two things the report made me wonder about. First, since as I have reported previously spending by hospitals and other healthcare providers on capital expenses and supplies is not rising fast enough to be causing the increases that have been observed, what can the cause possibly be?

Second, the finding that spending rose even as utilization declined supports the point the I’ve been making around here for some time and casts at least a little doubt on the notion that the rise in healthcare spending is being driven by patients. The healthcare sector has become a self-licking lollipop. Changing how the bills are paid won’t change that. We need healthcare reform. Healthcare spending is the federal government’s single largest budget item and it’s driving state and local governments to default.

One last point: the situation is actually slightly worse than the article or the study would suggest. They’re comparing the increase in prices in healthcare to the increases in prices, generally. They should be comparing prices in healthcare to non-healthcare prices for a more realistic view of what’s actually happening. Total healthcare spending is now a sufficiently large proportion of total spending that increases in healthcare spending are a major component if not the major component of overall spending increases that they account for a substantial portion of “inflation”, i.e. increasing prices which is apparently what the article intends when it uses the word.

7 comments… add one
  • steve Link

    This a big study on which I have written multiple posts in past years. To keep it short, plus I am on vacation and sneaking on to my computer, I think this further emphasizes the importance of utilization. With our current economic issues, utilization is down. When it returns to normal, utilization likely does also. Next, utilization actually increased in the area where we have seen the largest increase in expenditures, outpatient procedures. Next, we need finer studies to cone down on what is causing the cost increases. Last of all, out of pocket expenses increased both as a total and as a percentage. Consumers are not holding down costs like we hoped they would. Ok, really last of all, I am not sure this one year fits well with earlier trends, and I am not sure what it means in the Great Recession.

    Steve

  • PD Shaw Link

    First question, am I right in perceiving that the number of nursing home units has been going up, perhaps quicker than utilization?

    Second, what is the impact of Medicaid payments? If the states responded to their fiscal problems by slowing the rate of payment for Medicaid, that would tend to push prices up independent of utilization.

  • TastyBits Link

    Q: “Why are prices for medical services rising far faster than inflation?”

    A: Somebody keeps paying the price, and prices will rise until somebody refuses to pay them.

    Healthcare has been declared a must have item, and any healthcare needed must be provided. Healthcare is now “too big to fail”, and there is no limit on the amount of money the gov’t will throw at it. The only solution is to limit the amount of healthcare used. This will be done by the gov’t, the insurance companies, or the individual, but it will be done.

    We will probably wind up with a two tier system similar to the school system. There will be public healthcare system for all, and there will be a private healthcare system for those who can afford it. The local healthcare system will probably mirror the local school system in quality, and all the issues with the public school system will be mirrored in the public healthcare system.

    The gov’t healthcare system will eventually pay for schooling with a commitment to work for the gov’t for a period of time. It will be somewhat similar to military hitches.

    “For the Snark was a Boojum, you see.”

  • Second, the finding that spending rose even as utilization declined supports the point the I’ve been making around here for some time and casts at least a little doubt on the notion that the rise in healthcare spending is being driven by patients.

    Gammon’s Law. That more and more resources will flow into the afflicted sector despite declining demand. Doctors who move into administration, nurses who move into administration, administrators, these people are the problem and absolutely not the solution. More and more spending is going towards administration/bureaucracy than actual health care.

    He [Max Gammon] was led to enunciate what he called “the theory of bureaucratic displacement.” In his words, in “a bureaucratic system . . . increase in expenditure will be matched by fall in production. . . . Such systems will act rather like `black holes,’ in the economic universe, simultaneously sucking in resources, and shrinking in terms of `emitted production.'”

  • steve Link

    @Steve- Utilization only kind of decreased. I know it sucks to read such along study, but utilization decreased in inpatient care, a long term trend, and in outpatient professional services. Utilization increased for outpatient procedures, the expensive kind of care. Medical care is somewhat sensitive to economic conditions, so I surprised it did not drop more.

    Steve

  • Icepick Link

    Speaking of prices….

    But that just can’t be right. Seriously, energy prices spiking by that much in that time frame? Better hope for cool summers, otherwise a lot of old people will be dying from heat stroke up there.

  • Utilization only kind of decreased. I know it sucks to read such along study, but utilization decreased in inpatient care, a long term trend, and in outpatient professional services. Utilization increased for outpatient procedures, the expensive kind of care. Medical care is somewhat sensitive to economic conditions, so I surprised it did not drop more.

    Oh…but the ratio of utilization/spending has plummeted. We are spending vastly more resources on health care and not getting nearly as much output on a per dollar basis.

    But we need to make sure everyone has even more care in the future.

    No, I don’t see a sustainability problem here at all.

    Christ.

Leave a Comment