Speaking of delusional in the Washington Post Anne Applebaum writes about British Labour’s new leader:
Corbyn and his allies say they don’t like “politics as usualâ€; but in fact, what they really don’t like is democratic politics, with its compromises and its negotiations, its tedious decision-making process, its inevitable drift toward centrism and, of course, the annoying voters, journalists, opposition politicians and others who ask difficult questions. Nor do they like democratic politicians, in Britain, the United States or anywhere else, preferring the company of Venezuelan populists or radicals funded by Iran. In parliament for more than 30 years, Corbyn has voted against his own party hundreds of times. While colleagues were grappling with real decisions and hard questions, coping with bureaucracy and negotiating with allies, he stayed on the sidelines, preferring to remain ideologically pure. This week, he refused to sing the national anthem.
I don’t know whether Mr. Corbyn’s election portends a shift of the British electorade crazywards culminating with his becoming Prime Minister, frustration with elites (it’s going around these days), the continuing decline of British Labour, or something else. Maybe someone more knowledgeable than I can tell me.
I do know this. Listen to their records. Watch their TV programs and movies. Enjoy the reports of their antics in the tabloids. Don’t elect them to higher office.
Listen to their records… Enjoy the reports of their antics in the tabloids. Don’t elect them to higher office.
Uh oh. Tasty Bits isn’t going to like you taking a shot at his candidate.
Seems like another example of the out of office party acting crazy. Look at the GOP for another example.
Steve
@Icepick
He must be talking about Kanye West.
Is Nicki Minaj any worse than the actual candidates? Do Republicans really think she would have been worse than President Obama? Do Democrats really think she would have been worse than President Bush? If so, they should stop the bitching because somebody worse could have been elected, but that is not how either of them act.
I realize that a lot of white people do not go for the “junk in the trunk”. So, Britney Spears could be an alternative choice. She is not your typical skinny assed white girl, and she is not total trailer trash.
(The baby was only sitting on her lap not actually driving the car. She had auto insurance. Her license was not expired, and there was no plastic Jesus on the dash or Confederate flag on the bumper. No respectable trailer park would ever allow her to live there.)
President Obama was brought in hope and change, and he was going to fundamentally change the system. He changed the system, and his acolytes are singing his praises. His other supporters are only along for the ride because they are against Republicans. Little of the changes will be of any benefit to the people he was supposed to help, and most of the changes will further entrench the benefits of the people he was supposed to hurt.
Would you rather waste your vote by refusing to play the game, or would you like the chance to use your vote to expose the nonsense of the system?
If those are not to your liking, how about a furry? Or, a zombie?
Anybody who voted for “Hope and Change” would be no worse off with Nicki Minaj, Britney Spears, or a furry as president.
If I was going to vote celebrity, it would be for George Clinton. He’s already got his own theme song for the inaugural.
Or, failing that because he’s old, I’d vote Afroman. All fuck ups would be explained with “… because I got high, da da da da dadada….”
@Icepick
I am kinda liking my furry idea. Having him/her give the State of the Union in costume. Going to G-20 summits in costume.
The Secret Service could have decoy furries. Instead of a limo, they could have a clown car, and all the furries could pile out.
Imagine having a one-to-one meeting with the dictator of the month. They could schedule multiple simultaneous meetings using the decoy furries with the bad guy dictators.
It would be even better if they could do crazy antics like sports mascots.
Can someone explain how Corbyn is crazier than any “centrist” candidate? This is the bajillionth character assasination of the man I’ve read in less than a week; that doesn’t indicate he’s the joke Dave is suggesting but someone the establishment is in terror of.
If only the man would endorse invasions, permanent war, a domestic surveillance state, endless deregulation and bailouts for bankers and continual decline of living standards he would be reasonable and Very Serious and a proper member of the extreme center.
It doesn’t matter Corbyn was elected in the most democratic contest seen in decades and by the largest majority since the stone age; if he refuses to compromise all his principles then he’s undemocratic. Democracy is ignoring what your constituents elect you to do. Democracy is slavishly serving the will of tax-dodging media oligarchs and corrupt lords who routinely bribe their way into office. Democracy is always representong the interests of the powerful over those who have nothing but their votes.
So yes, I suppose Corbyn is in the minds of a group of people so warped and drunk with self-importance an anti-democratic figure.
“Little of the changes will be of any benefit to the people he was supposed to help, and most of the changes will further entrench the benefits of the people he was supposed to hurt.”
I think this is largely correct. Further, he has left the down ballot Dem Party in an absolute shambles. You folks may recall that when it was still candidate Obama I predicted just this. It was met with guffaws. But if you knew who he was from his utterly undistinguished stint in IL rather than the media creature presented to the nation you knew you had much less than met the eye.