Don’t Get Cocky

In a Financial Times op-ed Lawrence Summers issues five warnings to “world leaders”. At least three of the five (and maybe all five) can be summarized as “don’t get cocky”.

Here are his five warnings:

  1. You can’t fine-tune:

    First, programme announcements that are vague and try to purchase stability on the cheap are more likely to exacerbate problems than to resolve them.

    or don’t get cocky.

  2. The second was stated cannily by Abraham Lincoln as “You can fool some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time:

    Second, dubious assertions by policymakers end up undermining confidence.

    or don’t get cocky.

  3. So far they’ve been successful at preventing a meltdown of the financial system. That’s the first step in the mission rather than its completion:

    Third, containing systemic financial risk is not enough to restore growth.

    or don’t get cocky.

  4. Slow growth and deflation are worse than profligacy and debt.
  5. Fiscal contraction leads to economic contraction.

I think that Dr. Summers is getting a little cocky himself on those last two points. What happens when you don’t know how to increase growth or, for political reasons, are incapable of taking the steps necessary to do so? On that last point I’ll have more to say in a later post. Suffice it to say for now that my experience in life has been that when you identify something that’s not working, you know how to fix it, and you do so, you’re frequently amazed at how many other things that helps.

But don’t get cocky.

6 comments… add one
  • Slow growth and deflation are worse than profligacy and debt.

    Unless of course the profligacy and debt lead to slow growth and debt. How do you get out of that hole?

    Suffice it to say for now that my experience in life has been that when you identify something that’s not working, you know how to fix it, and you do so, you’re frequently amazed at how many other things that helps.

    I think that we also have to remember your earlier comment about politically inability. There are quite a few policy ideas that would probably help our situation. All of them are infeasible and will likely remain.

    Bottom line: there is no good policy going forward that is also politically feasible.

  • Ben Wolf Link

    Steve,

    Public debt in an autonomous currency issuer does not slow growth, it creates a safe haven in which the private sector can save. Extinguishing the debt means extinguishing the savings.

  • Ben Wolf Link

    Sectoral balances simply require that government spend when the private sector saves. It can’t be any other way without government harming the economy. Attempting to balance the budget will mean competing with the private sector for scarce dollars and create a net drain on financial assets. If the private sector wants to save money, let it.

    http://blogs.ft.com/gavyndavies/files/2010/12/ftblog52.gif

    http://pragcap.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/SB1.png

  • This is from the guy who said that one of the most important things for Europe to do is not let any big financial institutions fail….

  • Public debt in an autonomous currency issuer does not slow growth….

    I think Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart would disagree there Ben, at least when there is too much of it.

  • Ben Wolf Link

    Steve,

    I may be incorrect, but as I recall Rogoff and Reinhart focused on countries owing debts in foreign currencies. I’ll take another look at the paper.

    Andy,

    Agreed. Something has gone terribly wrong when Larry Summers starts making sense.

Leave a Comment