Why Biden Will Be the Nominee

At FiveThirtyEight Nate Silver explains how a “contested convention”, the modern term for what used to be called a “brokered convention” could happen:

I’d say a contested convention is a case where the nomination outcome is genuinely in doubt at the time the convention begins.

I realize that this introduces a little bit of subjectivity (what does “genuinely in doubt” mean?).2 The problem is that the most common alternative definition — that a contested convention is any convention that requires multiple ballots — doesn’t capture the spirit of a contested convention very well.

That’s because there could be situations where a convention nominally required multiple ballots to resolve, but the outcome wasn’t contentious. Say in the scenario above — where Warren had won a clear plurality of pledged delegates — everyone agreed that the best way to ensure party unity behind Warren would be to have Biden and Sanders delegates respect the original primary and caucus vote on the first ballot and vote for Biden and Sanders. Then everybody would get behind Warren as a show of force on the second ballot. Moreover, say all of this was scripted and widely disclosed to the press weeks ahead of the convention. It’s hard to think of this being a contested convention in any meaningful respect.

Conversely, it’s possible to imagine the outcome being genuinely in doubt — but the relevant negotiations to resolve the deadlock take place before the first ballot is cast. Say, for instance, that after the Virgin Islands, the delegate count was Sanders 32 percent, Biden 28 percent, Amy Klobuchar 25 percent, and Warren 15 percent. There’s a lot of doubt about the identity of the nominee when everyone gathers in Milwaukee. But Biden offers Klobuchar the vice presidency in exchange for Klobuchar instructing her delegates to vote for Biden on the first ballot. Klobuchar agrees and almost all of her delegates go along, so Biden is nominated with 53 percent of the vote on the first ballot. To me, that ought to count as a contested convention, even though it technically required only one ballot.

I think the most likely outcome is that Joe Biden will come to the convention with a plurality of pledged delegates with Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and, possibly, Pete Buttigieg, each coming to the convention with fewer pledged delegates. Under those circumstances the superdelegates would become vitally important and they will overwhelmingly support Biden, just as the system was designed to ensure.

The Iowa caucuses, which take place a week from Monday, will be a test of sorts of that. I think that, despite all of the hoopla, Joe Biden is likely to win more pledged delegates than any of the other candidates, probably 40% with Sanders receiving about 30% and Warren and Buttigieg each receiving about 15%. Unless Klobuchar somehow manages to break through and secure 15% or more of the delegates, she is likely out of the race entirely.

11 comments… add one
  • Guarneri Link

    You are correct, the power structure will dictate Biden. Then the fun starts. Biden has used his office as an ATM machine for family members. It’s coming out, in spite of media obfuscation.

    Then what.

  • TarsTarkas Link

    I see no evidence supporting your hypothesis. On a good day Biden looks lost and confused. On a bad day he thinks Hunter is Beau. Joe is stupid, he’s corrupt, he’s a blowhard, and increasingly he seems demented. The DNC may want him because he can be easily guided, but by the time the convention occurs he might be more fit to be in a Remembrance Wing than in the White House. The AOC wing is rabidly against him, are backing Sanders and are threatening to burn the place down if he doesn’t get the nomination. The other remaining viable candidates either want to bribe their way to the nomination or bully their way to it. Right now I have no f**king idea who the Democratic nominee will be, other that it won’t be Barack Obama.

  • Joe is stupid, he’s corrupt, he’s a blowhard, and increasingly he seems demented.

    None of those have been any barrier to his having been elected and re-elected since 1973.

    The AOC wing is rabidly against him, are backing Sanders and are threatening to burn the place down if he doesn’t get the nomination.

    Whether the Sanders supporters support the eventual nominee will be the defining question for the Democratic Party for years to come. Some of those Sanders supporters have been quite open about wanting their own political party. I think they should have it but it shouldn’t be the Democratic Party. Sanders still has no more than 27% support among Democrats and that’s his highest to date.

  • Greyshambler Link

    Every long-standing Senator is popular in their home state from I suppose, familiarity. Biden should end up the nominee for the worst reason, it’s his turn at last. He doesn’t have the personality to win more than loyal Democratic voters.

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    In 2016, Sanders got 43% of primary votes.

    That is a lot higher than 27%.

  • Guarneri Link

    Easy there, Tars.

    I’m no Biden fan, and it is increasingly evident he’s as corrupt as any number of Washington pols. But I think Dave’s got the pulse right.

    The DNC wants him. (See: “Impeachment” Its all about covering for Joe.) They know the AOC wing (Sanders, Warren, Pete) are dead men and women walking in a general election sense. Further, I think Dave is flat damned correct that there is a fundamental split emerging into public view in the Democrat Party. Biden may be limping into home with traditional Dems, but the wild eyed are pissed and crazed, and could create chaos.

    I think the real thought question is who could swoop in as a Hail Mary and unite the two. HRC is one option, but perhaps the Bernie wing has now had it with that bitc……

    And then there’s Bloomberg, and all that money.

  • That is a lot higher than 27%.

    That’s not reflected in present national polling. The 43% was running against Hillary Clinton.

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    There is polling; and then is what people actually did in the voting booth.

    I saw reminders today that Bernie significantly out-performed the polls in Iowa, New Hampshire in 2016.

  • jan Link

    The last sentence in Drew’s post is someone who could swoop in at the end and grab the democrat nomination. Bloomberg, IMO, is a sleeper candidate who has a boat load of his own money to spend as he pleases. He also has wiggled around in his policy stances making him a hybrid of sorts who offers a little for everyone – prudent businessman, climate and gun control advocate, and a generosity (unlike AOC) to share $$$ with other democrat candidates and causes.

  • TarsTarkas Link

    ‘Joe is stupid, he’s corrupt, he’s a blowhard, and increasingly he seems demented.

    None of those have been any barrier to his having been elected and re-elected since 1973.’

    There’s stupidity, and then there’s abject stupidity. Posting a videotape boasting how you suborned a foreign country is abject stupidity. I don’t want the entrenched bureaucracy running this country any more than it has been the last quarter century, which is what would happen if Biden became President.

  • steve Link

    “‘Trump is stupid, he’s corrupt, he’s a blowhard, and increasingly he seems demented.”

    Yet that doesn’t stop you from thinking he is the best POTUS ever.

    Steve

Leave a Comment