What We Can’t Afford

I found this post at Personal Finance Cheatsheet quite distressing:

Though there is some debate over the exact income a middle class household brings in, we do have an idea of who the middle class are — most working class people. Today’s bourgeoisie is composed of laborers and skilled workers, white collar and blue collar workers, many of whom face financial challenges. Bill Maher reminded us a few months back that 50 years ago, the largest employer was General Motors, where workers earned an equivalent of $50 per hour (in today’s money). Today, the largest employer — Walmart — pays around $8 per hour.

The middle class has certainly changed. We’ve ranked a list of things the middle class can no longer really afford. We’re not talking about lavish luxuries, like private jets and yachts. The items on this list are a bit more basic, and some of them are even necessities. The ranking of this list is based on affordability and necessity. Therefore, items that are necessity ranked higher, as did items that a larger percentage of people have trouble paying for.

Here’s their list of things that middle income people can “no longer really afford”:

  1. Vacations
  2. New vehicles
  3. Paying off debt
  4. Emergency savings
  5. Retirement savings
  6. Medical care
  7. Dental care

I can provide at least anecdotal evidence for the last item on the list. My dentist clients have been complaining since 2008 that they hadn’t seen anything like what’s happened to their businesses in their entire working lives. People are just not getting dental care. Since dental problems can be contributing factors to all sorts of other health problems, e.g. heart problems, that’s not prudent. It also provides a little support for a point I’ve made repeatedly here. People don’t distinguish between necessary healthcare and unnecessary healthcare. When they economize on healthcare, they may well choose wrong with serious implications down the road.

I have several observations. GM employees earn about what they did fifty years ago, maybe a bit more, and I suspect that the typical GM employee can afford all of the things on that list. There are just a lot fewer of them than there were 50 years ago.

There’s a big difference between a retail sales clerk and a GM hourly worker. Do we really think that sales clerks at Walmart should be able to afford middle class lifestyles?

Finally, I don’t recall that ordinary middle class people did all of the things in their list 50 years ago. 70 years ago my family which could reasonably have been considered middle class (although we lived in a working class neighborhood) didn’t. We always paid off debt, had a little emergency savings, and got medical and dental care. We had no retirement savings, didn’t take a vacation every year, and generally bought used cars. I think a little more research into how ordinary middle income people actually lived 50 years ago would be in order before making any generalizations.

All of that having been said, I don’t think the United States can be the sort of country we expect it to be if the typical job is retail sales clerk and we continue to import large numbers of workers from other countries who’d be happy to work for a less-than-middle-income wage. My preference would be a lot fewer retail sales clerks and a few more people working in the factories that make the gadgets that we use instead of having so many retail sales clerks. I seem to be in the minority in that view.

7 comments… add one
  • Jimbino Link

    Amerikans need to cancel their insurance, including Obamacare, and look to Mexico, Costa Rica, Brazil, Argentina, Czech Republic, Hungary, India and Thailand for medical and dental care. I had cataract surgery in Rio de Janeiro last year that cost half what I would have paid in the USSA. This year, I will have dental exams and cleaning done in Buenos Aires, where the dollar is exceptionally strong. In India and Thailand, you can get major surgery for some 1/9 what you’d pay in the USSA. Even Switzerland, not known for a cheap cup of coffee, offers routine colonoscopy at half what it costs in the USSA.

  • ... Link

    Jimbino, if you can’t afford to go to those places , it doesn’t matter if their offerings are cheap.

    And Schuler, you’re in a clear supermajority. But that doesn’t matter because of the CEO-ocracy currently running the country. They like the way things are trending.

  • PD Shaw Link

    Jimbino, I am starting to wonder if you know that your are misspelling America? You may want to review your spell-check software.

  • Guarneri Link

    With colonoscopy prices like that, jimbino, perhaps you should double up your frequency.

    Can’t be too safe when it comes to cancer.

  • ... Link

    LOL @ Drew & PD

  • ... Link

    Back on point:

    Except for rich, Americans’ incomes fell last year

    Every other group [besides the top quintile] lost ground, with the bottom 20 percent losing the most: their average income dropped 3.5 percent to $9,818.

    Those losses came despite an economy that was picking up pace and generating well over 200,000 jobs a month last year.

    While the majority of incomes fell, consumer spending, which accounts for about two-thirds of US economic activity, rose 1.0 percent on average.

    The largest increase was an 11.3 percent rise in healthcare spending, which has climbed every year since 1996, to an average of $3,919.

    Housing expenditures rose 2.0 percent to $17,377.

    Incomes down, spending up – people are finally getting on board with the Fed program, I guess.

    Also saw a headline this morning, which I didn’t have the heart to follow, that someone is already speculating that Yellen will institute QE4 if consumer spending falls. For the rich, everything. For the poor, more immigration.

  • There are several notable things in the passage you quoted, ellipsis. First, it’s going to be tough to spin 1% consumer spending growth as a robust economy. I’m sure they’ll try.

    Second, look at that growth in healthcare spending! That’s mammoth. An order of magnitude greater than non-healthcare spending growth. I think it’s fair to say that the name given to healthcare reform, the “Affordable Care Act”, is Orwellian to say the least. And about “Patient Protection” the less said the better.

Leave a Comment