The Scottish Play

I haven’t mentioned the vote on Scottish independence yet. It’s big news here—scarcely an hourly newscast passes without at least five minutes and sometimes much more being devoted to the subject.

As is my practice I don’t want to intrude in other countries’ political affairs. IMO Scottish independence is an issue to be worked out between the Scots and the English.

I would note parenthetically that I have heard no commentary whatever on the implications of not being a monetary sovereign. It’s pretty obvious that the large nominally Scottish banks are aware of the issue:

Scotland’s Yes campaign has been dealt a significant blow after Lloyds and RBS threatened to move headquarters operations to London if the country quits the Union.

The banks, which employ a total of 27,500 in Scotland, confirmed they would register themselves in England if voters opt for independence next week.

And the department store giant John Lewis warned that shoppers in Scotland could expect higher prices if it votes for independence because retailers would no longer be willing to absorb the higher cost of trading there across the UK.

It moves the referendum battleground to matters of the “head” and the country’s crucial financial services sector, which generates around £7-9bn each year and employs 100,000.

It’s difficult to ferret out the statistics to get a decent handle on the character of Scotland’s trade. I know that the U. S. is its largest single foreign trading partner, if taken as a whole the EU is its largest single foreign trading partner, and that because of present free trade between Scotland and the balance of the United Kingdom it’s a bit difficult to nail down the volume of that trade.

The prevailing wind seems to be blowing in the direction of retaining the pound if the independence vote passes. Is that the right move?

Emotions are running very high on this subject on both sides and I strongly suspect that the ultimate decisions will be made emotionally. That doesn’t negate the many practical considerations that should be taken into account.

From the U. S. point of view I think that Scottish independence would be a bad development. Not only would it weaken the United Kingdom, one of only two NATO members other than the U. S. at the highest level of military force readiness, should it elect to join NATO it would be yet another free rider that was not pulling its weight in the alliance.

10 comments… add one
  • Ben Wolf Link

    Using a foreign currency would be a terrible decision. It would force the government to issue its liabilities in a currency it will not control, leaving its financing dependent on a combination of running perpetual trade surpluses with what is left of the UK and attracting investment from capital markets. A major crisis would be one demand shock away, as we saw with the EMU. If Scots banks were to get into trouble the government would be unable to prevent a collapse of the financial system without resorting to foreign loans and we know what happens to countries that make deals with the IMF.

  • The issue of becoming a monetary sovereign isn’t even under discussion. The choices that are being offered are between the pound and the euro (it seems to me the dollar would be another alternative). I’m flabbergasted this isn’t part of the discussion.

  • Ben Wolf Link

    Orthodox economists do not typically recognize the difference between a currency user and a currency issuer and monetary systems are generally an afterthought. They think all that need be done to keep the good times rolling is to hit a magic interest rate producing an optimal rate of savings. On top of that these economists and financial experts I hear endlessly interviewed on the BBC are still using models that consider demand shocks impossible as markets are self-equilibrating.

  • sam Link

    ” I have heard no commentary whatever on the implications of not being a monetary sovereign”

    Paul Krugman, Scots , What the Heck?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/08/opinion/paul-krugman-scots-what-the-heck.html

  • sam Link

    Check your spaminator, Dave.

  • Thanks, sam. I meant from the folks over here in the UK.

  • Ben Wolf Link

    Krugman, who has consistently trashed MMT by accusing (without attribution) its scholars of holding ideas and opinions they don’t actually hold, is now objecting to independence for Scotland by invoking a real MMT argument (also without attribution).

    Oh, how deliciously tortured that man’s mind must be.

  • TastyBits Link

    The problem with creating a fiat currency is trust and value.

  • Much more dramatic:

    http://youtu.be/Epytc4wMJ5Y

Leave a Comment