The Past Is a Foreign Country

I felt a certain resonance with Lance Morrow’s recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal:

The ’30s are a vanished world. Much of the 20th century has become a sort of Atlantis, and analogies between the old time and our own are tenuous. A political archaeologist might find that the most reliable common denominator is what could be called the unchanging metaphysics of lying. As Francis Bacon wrote 400 years ago, human beings have a “natural though corrupt love of the lie itself.”

Mr. Trump works with huckster falsehoods—the flashy superlatives of a car salesman. The progressive left works with conceptual falsities. Voters in 2020 will decide which style of lies they prefer.

Mr. Trump composes his reality after the manner of a Renaissance painter’s pentimento, except that he works at the speed of Twitter , making adjustments as circumstances shift. He slaps new paint over old facts when they become inconvenient. Mr. Trump’s abuses, he and his followers believe, somehow come right by coalescing in a larger truth—the mythic America that radiated from my father’s old Saturday Evening Post and came to its apotheosis in the Neverland of Dwight Eisenhower’s 1950s.

The progressive left embraces new visions of perfection—tamer in its methods than its 1930s predecessors, but sometimes outdistancing them in the fusion of dogmatic correctness with a fairly advanced decadence. Progressives are busy reinventing the Kingdom of God on Earth, trying to make their version as different as possible from his. They contrive elaborate new genders, for example—ones the deity didn’t think of. They invent vocabularies, terms ecstatic and bristling—“cisgendered,” “heteronormative,” “intersectionality”—designed to bully reality into compliance.

Their version of the kingdom mixes hopes of social justice with sexual nullifications and revenge fantasies. In my mother’s time, the far left in its dreams crushed capitalism and ushered the workers into paradise. Today they sweep white civilization and toxic males into the dustbin of history.

Affirmative action, now a permanent fixture of American society, remains out of step with the country’s basic idea of fairness.

“Diversity,” politicized and bureaucratically institutionalized, forms the basis for systems of un-American coercion.

Martin Luther King Jr.’s notion of valuing a man’s character over the color of his skin remains the gold standard, and yet even his greatest admirers claim it doesn’t really apply anymore—or never did.

The progressive notion of gender as a “social construct,” rather than sex as a fact of nature, contradicts ages worth of human experience about the biological roles of men and women in the drama of procreation and survival.

The rule of law is cast aside for a 13th-century dream of open borders and sanctuary cities.

The left disparages masculinity as evil and Western civilization as monstrous, hoping to extinguish the intellectual and moral legacy that created the U.S. in the first place. If we are not careful, the strategy might work.

His life’s trajectory is one that might well have been mine. Like his mother my father was a communist in the 1930s. By the 1960s he was a conservative. He had opportunities to follow politics as a career. Harry Truman asked him to be his campaign manager for his final senate campaign. He chose the law instead. My dad started out as a journalist; his dad was a journalist for most of his career until he became a speechwriter and advisor to Nelson Rockefeller.

We are conditioned to think of the present as a culmination but that’s an illusion. It’s just a way station and there is no straight line progression in human affairs. Bloodletting, phrenology, communism, and eugenics have all been mainstream views in their time, held by the very most forward-thinking and scientific minds.

9 comments… add one
  • steve Link

    “The left disparages masculinity as evil and Western civilization as monstrous,”

    He sprinkles his rant with outright falsehoods like the above. I guess it makes him feel good, but doesn’t help much. (Yes, there is a small group on the left who probably think masculinity is evil, just like there is a small group on the right who think all gays should be stoned to death. Both groups really exist, but they really dont represent the majority view.) No one uses the term cisgendered where I work. Finally, this left that supposedly wants open borders? Is that the same left that voted for barriers in the past? In populated areas where it makes sense? So again, there are individuals and small groups that really do want open borders on the left, just like we have some groups on the right who also want that, but it is not the dominant belief.

    I think it is a shame that we continue to take seriously writers who only use the worst examples and worst ideas of those they oppose to make their points, especially when they are minority opinions held by the opposition.

    Steve

  • I thought you’d be amused by his op-ed. As I said in the opening of my post, it has resonance with me although I don’t agree with every word of his observations.

    However, I presume you agree that the phrase “toxic masculinity” has become acceptable in polite company while talking about stoning gays is not. If you disagree, please produce one recommendation of stoning gays from a major media outlet, either in an editorial or op-ed, without qualification, denial, irony, or used as other than a strawman argument, over the period of the last 50 years. I’m pretty sure you’ll be able to find multiple references to “toxic masculinity” in major media outlets over the last week.

  • Gray Shambler Link

    I think Morrow is stretching reality because he is engaged in the ongoing struggle to control the public narrative. Articles like his are part of the negotiations and you can find their mirror image @ Huffington Post.
    The pressure on society toward political correctness has completely destroyed humor and any form of reasonable discussion. People are afraid to talk. Our minds are hair triggered to spot racial, feminist, gay, transgender, Islamophobic words. We withdraw. And these activists press forward into the positions of social and political power. But you can never gain true acceptance through intimidation, so white, cisgendered, straight males must be silenced and marginalized. Activists know the weak point, these men work and provide. Care for families. Threaten their employment and you’ve got them by the balls. Too bad you’ll never reach their hearts this way. They can still vote. In the polls and with their feet.
    BTW: Re-watched the movie “Trading places” last night.
    Dan Aykroyd in blackface. We were taking bets on whether they would edit that out, they didn’t. Where’s the shitstorm?

  • Modulo Myself Link

    I’m pretty sure you’ll be able to find multiple references to “toxic masculinity” in major media outlets over the last week.

    And what do these references say? That men are evil? Or that the traditional role of masculinity can cause psychological problems for men? This is from Vox:

    Earlier this month, the American Psychological Association released new guidelines for working with men that highlighted a substantial body of research pointing to some of the harmful effects that the constricted enculturation of “traditional masculinity” have on men and the people around us. “Traits of so-called ‘traditional masculinity,’ like suppressing emotions & masking distress, often start early in life & have been linked to less willingness by boys & men to seek help, more risk-taking & aggression — possibly harming themselves & those with whom they interact,” the APA tweeted as part of the guideline announcement.

    How that is like arguing gay people should be stoned to death is beyond me.

  • steve Link

    “However, I presume you agree that the phrase “toxic masculinity” has become acceptable in polite company while talking about stoning gays is not.”

    Yes, though I would stipulate that if we could track it, the term is probably mostly used by folks on the right characterizing the left, or by people that I have never heard of.

    Steve

  • Andy Link

    steve,

    Outside of Westboro Baptists nutjobs, who pretty much everyone despises, there isn’t anyone in America calling for gays to be stoned to death. And actually, now that I’m actually looking, I can’t find a reference where even the Westboro group has explicitly advocated stoning gays (not that they are despicable people who cheer the deaths of others, whatever the cause).

    So, I think if you’re trying to make a serious comparison here, some evidence is in order.

    Progressive speech policing, on the other hand, of which “toxic masculinity” is a part, is endemic in academia, much of the media, enlightened companies like Facebook and Google and is even progressed into the rarified world of knitting.

  • Andy Link

    Should have been “not that they aren’t”

    I am, in no way, any friend or ally of the Westboro baptist’s or their ilk.

  • Also, please take note of the title of my post. I think that Mr. Morrow is a reasonable man, probably a liberal. If he is a Republican he is of a type nearly extinct, the northeastern Republican liberal (like Nelson Rockefeller)—those who in the 1960s voted to pass the Civil Rights Act. If he’s a Democrat it’s along the lines of Hubert Humphrey or Walter Mondale.

    He is white and in his 70s. He’s expressing how he interprets the present discourse.

  • steve Link

    I just used stoning the gays as an example. Dominionists actually do advocate for this. The lawyer in CA who keeps trying to put shoot the gays bills up for referendum is, reportedly, part of that group. Will have to take your word about the knitting thing as I cant imagine actually reading that piece. Maybe the small group of people who think toxic masculinity is a problem is bigger than the group that wants gays stoned. (Do you actually know anyone who talks like that?) I think both groups are pretty small and dont represent what most people think.

    Steve

Leave a Comment