The “Foreign Entity”

Admidst all of the testifying, posturing, and speechifying of the last week there was this tidbit, reported by CNN:

GOHMERT: Well, I will help you with that too then.

Mr. Rucker reported to those of you, the four of you there, in the presence of the ICIG attorney that they had found this anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails going through her private server. And when they done the forensic analysis, they found that her e-mails,

every single one, except for four, over 30 000 of them, were going to win an address that was not on the distribution list.

It was a compartmentalized bit of information that was sending it to an unauthorized source. Do you recall that?

STRZOK: Sir, I don’t.

GOHMERT: Well, he went on to explain it. And you didn’t say anything. You thanked him. You shook his hand.

But the problem was that it was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia. And from what you have said here, you did nothing more than nod and shake the man’s hand, when you didn’t seem to be all that concerned about our national integrity of our election when it was involving Hillary Clinton.

Here’s my question. Would it make any difference if the “foreign entity” were China? Just curious.

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment