The Critique from the Left

Yves Smith presents the critique of President Obama’s term in office from the left:

Again and again, Obama has shown his true colors. It isn’t simply that Obama lied. Politicians lie. But there are norms for political lying. The depth and dependability of Obama’s misrepresentations constitute a difference in kind.

His pattern of grand promises producing at-best-in-name only and at worst outright bait and switch was well established by his 2008 campaign. Some close observers pointed out his past legerdemain, for instance, his misleading account of his years in New York, his record of fronting for finance and real estate interests in Chicago, his promise to bring a state-wide health care program to Illinois, which in the end was walked back to a mere study. And there were more decisive tells in 2008: the high level of Wall Street funding for his campaign, the inclusion of neoliberal “Chicago boys” in his economics team, his reversal on FISA after promising to filibuster it, which gave retroactive immunity to telecoms for aiding and abetting illegal wiretapping, and his whipping for TARP.

Obama didn’t make compromises necessary to lead effectively. He entered office with majorities in both houses and a country eager for a new direction. He has repudiated or retraded every pledge he made. He promised transformational leadership, and instead emulated Wall Street, devising complex programs that to sell average Americans short and reap his funders handsome rewards in the process. Rather than elevate his fellow citizens, Obama’s transactional focus and neoliberal philosophy have kicked the struggling middle class down the road greased by the right.

She goes on to state her case that the Democrats are actually worse than the Republicans at this point because more effective. My view is, perhaps, even more jaded than hers: I think that too many nominal progressives are just looking for jobs with some prospective progressive Democratic administration. They’ll throw any principle under the bus in a mad grab for a paycheck.

There are exceptions: Glenn Greenwald is just as critical of the Obama Administration’s detentions and human rights violations as he was of those of the Bush Administration. Principled progressive don’t have much of an alternative: either Obama or Romney will be elected in November.

10 comments… add one
  • Icepick Link

    Yeah, I’ve got to give Greenwald credit on that score. I’m not sure it makes up for his ponderous (to be generous) writing style, though.

  • Brett Link

    That was my problem with Greenwald as well. After a while, it’s just dull to read the latest “Outrage of the Day” post, particularly when it’s incredibly long and full of links.

    As for the Yves Smith essay, the one positive thing I can say about it was that she (mostly) stuck to criticizing Obama over things he could control as President. There were only a few times where she criticized him for things he had only limited influence over (such as bills in congress).

  • amspirnational Link

    Disagree re Greenwald. He has a knack for ferreting out the most important timely hypocrisies of the “soft progressives” and their kindred, and in a time saving manner which ably directs readers who can then skim and choose to the facts.

  • michael reynolds Link

    I can’t believe you’re quoting that gibberish approvingly. The last paragraph is self-contradictory in multiple directions simultaneously. Obama didn’t compromise sufficiently to keep all his promises literally and thus be transformational? Will Google Translate turn that into English?

    Actually, I’ll translate it: I thought I was getting a pony, instead I got a sweater.

    Every presidential candidate in my lifetime has promised transformation and a new Eden. Delivery rate so far? Not great. Why? Because they’re just presidents, not messiahs. You want transformation by one man, think dictatorship not democracy.

    I voted for Obama for exactly the same reason I’ve cast all my presidential votes: he was better than the other guy. (Still is, by the way, and I have zero regrets on that score.) If I wanted my life transformed I’d go be a monk or move to Mozambique.

  • I wasn’t quoting it approvingly. I don’t approve of everything I quote. I just found it interesting. When I find a divergent point of view from somebody who is reasonably well-informed as Yves Smith is, I think it’s appropriate to reflect on it.

  • Drew Link

    “If I wanted my life transformed I’d go be a monk or move to Mozambique.”

    Let me know how I can help………. 😉

    .

  • There are exceptions: Glenn Greenwald is just as critical of the Obama Administration’s detentions and human rights violations as he was of those of the Bush Administration. Principled progressive don’t have much of an alternative: either Obama or Romney will be elected in November.

    Yes, go vote. It will make such a difference.

    Suckers.

  • michael reynolds Link

    I wasn’t quoting it approvingly.

    My bad, Dave, I made an assumption. As penance I’m denying myself that Chimay that’s been calling to me from the fridge all day.

  • Brett Link

    @Michael Reynolds

    I voted for Obama for exactly the same reason I’ve cast all my presidential votes: he was better than the other guy.

    Same here. I also figured he wouldn’t be a disaster on foreign policy, and that he would be a signature on a health care reform bill instead of a veto.

  • amspirnational Link

    I know commenting is even more glib than blogging
    but for anyone e.g. Michael Reynolds to be able in the present circumstances to even extemporaneously ignore the need to form
    alternative parties to cleanse the corrupt two party system lesser of the evils result is,ummm, dissappointing.

Leave a Comment