Sewage Epidemiology

I found this study at the American Chemical Society very interesting. If the methodology of the authors pans out this may be an important finding:

BOSTON, Aug. 20, 2018 — America’s drug problem may be even worse than officials realize. And illicit drugs are consumed at a higher rate during celebratory events. Those are just two of the conclusions scientists have drawn from recent studies of drug residues in sewage.

The researchers will present their findings today at the 256th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS). ACS, the world’s largest scientific society, is holding the meeting here through Thursday. It features more than 10,000 presentations on a wide range of science topics.

In the U.S., more than 28 million people aged 12 or older used an illicit drug in 2016, including 12 million who misused opioids, according to estimates from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Collecting such data has some challenges, however.

“The conventional approach to assess community drug usage in the U.S. takes months or years,” Bikram Subedi, Ph.D., says. It’s also costly, and researchers have had to rely on drug-related crime statistics, overdose/toxicology reports and the public’s responses to surveys, which could well underreport use, he adds.

As a faster, inexpensive alternative, Subedi’s team at Murray State University uses “sewage epidemiology,” a technique for analyzing wastewater. Subedi, the project’s lead investigator, says this method gleans nearly real-time data on drug consumption in local communities. The testing shows that consumption of some drugs is far more widespread than HHS estimates suggest. It also confirms the intuitive assumption that drug use rises during celebrations.

In a prior study, Subedi analyzed drug use in New York. His recent studies were carried out in Kentucky, where undergraduate Katelyn Foppe and others in Subedi’s lab assessed whether special events, such as the Fourth of July or the 2017 solar eclipse, would impact drug use in two towns. They also wanted to know if the effects would differ in the towns, which are nearly the same size, just 50 miles apart and governed by the same rules and regulations.

The researchers collected samples at each town’s sewage treatment plant. After returning to the lab, the team filtered and extracted the samples and then analyzed them with high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. “The results showed that consumption of drugs like methamphetamine, cocaine and THC — the main active ingredient in marijuana — was significantly higher during festive events,” Subedi says. “But the profile and rate of consumption was significantly different in the two towns.” He plans to do further studies to explore the reasons for that difference.

Calculations based on the tests revealed levels of methamphetamine consumption that are among the highest ever reported in the U.S. In addition, the percentage of the population using amphetamine and methamphetamine was two- to four-fold higher than HHS estimates, according to the researchers. The samples also showed very high consumption of opiates such as hydrocodone, oxycodone, Percocet and morphine, Subedi says. He notes that Kentucky is in a region infested with illegal meth labs and burdened with extremely high opiate prescription rates.

And disturbing. What would the public policy implications of a rate of drug use significantly higher than the estimates of public health officials be?

11 comments… add one
  • Ben Wolf Link

    On challenges for single-payer not yet being addressed by advocates:

    https://shadowproof.com/2018/08/22/two-challenges-single-payer-movement-must-address/

  • That’s a good post, echoing themes that have been evergreen here. To those two concerns (taxes and provider compensation) I would add one more: we have never overestimated the cost of a federal program but we have frequently underestimated their costs drastically (e.g. Medicare). I think that legislation that doesn’t have controls built in will always result in cost overruns.

    I don’t expect advocates of single-payer to address any of those issues. They are so highly focused on its benefits they have little patience for coping with its costs.

  • Guarneri Link

    This is o/t. But I put it in the essay titled “sewer”. It looks like you may be a fresh debtor, Dave. Fear not, Mr Emanuel is an investment wizard. He worked for Solomon, you know. (Snicker).

    https://hotair.com/archives/2018/08/24/chicago-pension-debts/

  • I was aware of that. It’s a terrible idea. Short explanation: a city of 1.7 people will be servicing the debt incurred by a city of 2.7 million people. Everything City Hall wants to do will drive people out.

    They will also be borrowing at the highest rate of any major city in the country.

  • Guarneri Link

    I’ll be surprised if they can sell the bonds, period.

  • TastyBits Link

    I’ll be surprised if they can’t sell the bonds.

  • There is a buyer for any thing at any price. The pool of prospective buyers just shrinks as the price goes up and, if it rises high enough, it may become difficult to find that buyer.

    In Chicago’s case if you raise the interest rate the city pays high enough, it will find someone to buy the bonds. From my perspective it’s an IBGYBG problem. The guys negotiating the interest rate don’t plan on paying it. They’re relying on someone else to do that, presumably me.

  • steve Link

    Under this administration of they thought drug use was even worse, we would get an acceleration in the War on Drugs, and more stories about MS-13. This, despite quite a few studies out later showing that comprehensive programs including treatment have much better success. It is still seen as a moral failing by too many.

    Steve

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    At some point return of capital is more important then return on capital.

  • TarsTarkas Link

    We’re seeing it right now due to the tax reform bill.

    https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/overseas-profits-return

    And to all those naysayers out there stating that this money coming back to the US won’t create jobs; that money isn’t being hoarded. It’s being spent. On investments. On infrastructure. On R & D. On sales. Some of that money WILL be spent on payroll, if only on eyeshade people keeping track of it. Just because you believe in a narrative doesn’t mean it’s true.

  • steve Link

    TT- You do realize that your article doesn’t actually document any of that supposed growth in investment? Or R&D? Somehow it also fails to mention that, according to Mulvaney, it also means a big increase in deficits. just what we needed, deficit driven growth.

    Steve

Leave a Comment