In his post on gun control, Tyler Cowen divides American political thought, at least as it relates to firearms into four categories:
1. There are the anti-gun modern Democrats, who want Americans to own many fewer firearms, and who maybe favor slight cuts in defense spending, in order to spend more on redistribution. They donâ€™t come to terms with the reality that their vision for Americaâ€™s international state requires a fairly martial supporting culture at home, including strong attachments to gun ownership.
By the way, citations of the Australian gun control experience are a good indicator of this position and its partial naivete; Australian pacifism can to some extent free ride upon American martial interest. Another â€œwarning signâ€ is if someone is incredulous that the San Bernardino attack is strengthening Americaâ€™s attachment to a relatively martial internal culture, rather than leading to gun control. That person is out of touch, even if he or she is right about the substance of the issue.
2. There is the radical, anti-war, anti-military-industrial complex, semi-pacifist, anti-gun Left. Their positions on these issues are quite consistent, though this branch of the Left has disappeared almost entirely.
3. There are the libertarians, who hate martial culture on the international scene, but who wish to allow it or maybe even encourage it (personally, not through the government) at home, through the medium of guns. They are inconsistent, and they should consider being more pro-gun control than is currently the case. But I donâ€™t expect them to budge: they will see this issue only through the lens of liberty, rather than through the lens of culture as well. They end up getting a lot of the gun liberties they wish to keep, but losing the broader cultural battle and somehow are perpetually surprised by this mix of outcomes.
I except non-American libertarians from these charges, and indeed many of them, albeit under the table, in fact support gun control as a libertarian and indeed pro-peace position.
4. There are the â€œright-wing conservatives.â€ They support a martial ethic, they support Americaâ€™s active foreign policy abroad, and they are anti-gun control for the most part. And they find their greatest strength in the relatively martial American South. Like the old anti-war Left, their positions are consistent, and their positions are rooted in a cultural understanding of the issue. They see the gun control movement as a war on Americaâ€™s greatness, Americaâ€™s martial culture and the material embodiments of said culture. They donâ€™t understand why â€œthe worldâ€™s greatest nationâ€ should give up its superpower role, and its supporting internal martial culture, all for the sake of limiting the number of suicides and maybe stopping a few shootings too. To them itâ€™s not close to being worth it.
I don’t fit into any of them, except possibly “non-American libertarians”, ironic since I think I represent a strain of political thought that is distinctly American and older than any of the four he recognizes. It makes me sad.