Is There a Future for NATO?

Not the North Atlantic Treaty Organization although there’s some doubt about whether there’s a future for that, either. The other NATO. The National Association of Theater Owners. Movie theaters are having a bad time. Here’s what happened at their most recent convention as reported at The Verge:

Studio after studio touted their box office achievements. Executives couldn’t stop dropping superlatives, describing how the business was “thriving.” NATO chairman John D. Loeks went so far as to call reports about various threats to the industry “fake news.” But the truth is the industry is facing challenges, something that only Disney’s executive vice president of theatrical distribution, Dave Hollis, really had the courage to acknowledge directly.

“Even though we’ve had these gains in overall box office, we can also see that attendance has been more or less flat,” Hollis said during a Tuesday state of the union presentation. He stressed that while ticket prices have largely masked the problem, attendance simply isn’t growing, with the exponential uptick in internet usage and other activities a likely culprit. “This is disruption personified,” he said, to a near-silent industry crowd.

It didn’t help that a week before the show, Variety reported that six of the seven Hollywood studios were in active negotiations to release their films for home viewing less than three weeks after they hit theaters. Historically, the theatrical release window has been sacrosanct. It’s the amount of time movies play in theaters — and only in theaters — before rolling out to video on demand, Blu-ray, streaming services, and the other various options on a staggered schedule. Right now that window is largely standardized around 90 days (some players offer films a couple of weeks earlier through electronic services), with theater owners taking the position that a shortened window could irrevocably harm their business, if not sink it entirely.

You’d think they’d be used to it by now. The first time the movie business was dirupted was nearly 70 years ago, that time by television. In the 1930s and 40s you could go to a movie theater, see an A movie, a news reel, a cartoon, maybe a short subject or serial, and then a B movie. A whole evening’s entertainment for a very reasonable price.

Television killed the news reels, short subjects, serials, and Bs. Or, more precisely, television coopted them. The B movies of 70 or 80 years ago are what television is.

Back in the early 50s the studios struck back with Cinemascope, Panavision, 3D, even Smell-O-Vision and Percepto!, offering experiences that television couldn’t replicate. Yet. Today’s home theaters offer viewing experiences very much like those of actual movie theaters. Everything except the social aspects.

I don’t think that offering dinner or booze will help much. You’ve probably got Jack Daniels or Bacardi at home and can mix your drinks to your own tastes. Streaming and early streaming release may be the last straw for movie theaters.

Unless moviemakers can come up with something new to attract viewers into their theaters, movie theaters themselves may be as obsolete as the Mighty Wurlitzer.

3 comments… add one
  • Andy Link

    I used to go to the movies at least once a week. Now it’s maybe once a month. My teenage daughter goes a bit more often, but my boys would rather watch stuff on TV or their devices.

    If it wasn’t for the 90 day embargo we probably wouldn’t go at all. This past weekend I took my daughter and her friend to see Ghost in the Shell. $30 bucks for tickets plus another $48 for a couple of refreshments. Had to get up in the first five minutes because the projector was actually out of focus. Not really worth it in hindsight.

  • Modulo Myself Link

    Back in the 90s I was once a week movie person. If you cut out old movies, I’m probably going six to eight times a year. For blockbusters I’ve stopped bothering. Seeing Dr Strange or Rogue Whatever in theater seems ridiculous to me. I could have watched either on my laptop.

    Overall I would say that the new movies that have been worth it have been B-ish, strange, and not exactly blockbuster material. Get Out, I’m Not Your Negro, and Raw were all fantastic. It’s becoming obvious that art movies are basically providing actual action and entertainment rather than Fellini-style high art. Last year, I found The Witch and High-Rise a million times more excitingr than the dreadful X-Men movie.

  • Matthew the Oilman Link

    Sci-fi epics are worth seeing on the big screen, but the best-selling writers will never release creative control after the butchered job Hollywood did to Starship Troopers. I would totally go see a Starfire or a Honor Harrington movie.

Leave a Comment