Buried in a footnote to his post on the possibility of using Social Security reforms as a lever for breaking the impasse over the budget (and the debt ceiling), Bruce Krasting makes an interesting observation:
The “Non Partisan†CBO did not have to make dramatic changes to its mortality assumptions in September of 2013. The 5/13 SS Report to Congress did not have changes in its mortality rates, but CBO did. Why?
That’s an excellent question. Mr. Krasting suggests political motivations. I’d be interested in some alternative but none occurs to me. I’m not even sure how I’d go about finding out.
Here’s the CBO’s explanation. Does that actually answers the question. Why now?
Inflation rate………unemployment rate……ObamaCare signups….mortality assumptions…………
Any wonder zerohedge has a running rant against any government data?
But nobody is mad as hell (after all, the tax freight and incidence of other policy mal-results is born increasingly by the few) and they ARE going to continue to take it. I’ll leave readers to decide where.
Speaking of the minority. Wasn’t that a prime directive of government and law, to protect the minority from mob rule? We are on the verge of mob rule. Obama incites it each and every pronouncement.
Why now? Does it matter?
After reading their explanation I think they made the correct adjustment, in particular this: