What have we learned over 15 months of a Trump presidency? Precious little, I’m afraid.
We haven’t learned that Trump was a boor, an ignoramus, and a cad. Anyone who’d been paying attention already knew that.
We haven’t learned that Hillary Clinton is ungracious, self-pitying, and paranoiac. Anyone who’d been paying attention already knew that.
We haven’t learned that the Russians are engaging in espionage and disinformation campaigns against us. That was already common knowledge. I’ve always assumed it to be the case.
We haven’t learned that power is the primary motivating factor for the Republicans in Congress or that they’ll do anything including support Trump to hold onto it. That understanding is part of the very foundations of our republic so you would really need to be opposed to 200 years of the American experience not to recognize that. Or think that the Democrats don’t have precisely the same problem.
We haven’t learned that the Justice Department in general and the FBI in particular are corrupt and thoroughly politicized. Anyone who’d been paying attention already knew that.
We haven’t learned that the press hates Trump. Anyone who’d been paying attention already knew that.
Writing in the National Post Conrad Black observes:
The American media, joined by the fatuous imitative chirping of the Canadian media (not that Americans would be aware of or have the slightest interest in what the media or anyone else in Canada thought of anything), regularly imply or state that the U.S. government is being run autocratically by a thuggish individual unfit for his great office. Robert De Niro wants to send the president to prison in a comedy skit; Kathy Griffin, whose opening gambit was a still photograph of the president’s severed head, is now lampooning his entourage in predictable simulations. Desperately unoriginal and mouthy occupants of late-night purported comedy — Bill Maher, Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, Chelsea Handler — imagine that shouting rehashed denigrations of the president and his family are amusing. It is a bore; it isn’t working, and history moves on.
Pew Research Center and Harvard Media Studies surveys both confirm that 90 per cent of the national media coverage of Donald Trump is hostile, but he is accomplishing his stated goals, slowly. The asinine Dodd-Frank financial strangulation law, which enacted the bipartisan dual-branch official American pretence that private greed rather than unspeakable governmental incompetence was responsible for the 2008 financial meltdown, is being repealed. The Secretary of State-designate has returned from a secret visit to North Korea that appears to presage the most ambitious American diplomatic activity since president Reagan’s arms-reduction talks with president Gorbachev (1988), or even president Nixon’s accord with Mao Tse-tung and Chou En-lai (1972).
The economy is flourishing, illegal immigration is sharply curtailed. Assad has been smacked down and Putin faced down, and the gigantic canard of Trump collusion with Russia has collapsed. That investigation, generated by a fired FBI director illegally taking a doubtfully accurate memo and leaking it to the press, has now degenerated into an absurd handoff to New York prosecutors to see if the president’s lawyer committed a campaign finance offence when he paid off a rather peppy porn star for silence about an alleged one-evening encounter with Trump when no abuse or even ungentlemanliness was alleged, 10 years before he ran for president. Truly is America, the greatest nation in history, with all its complexities and shortcomings, mocked by the shallow bias of its free press and the absurdity of public discourse.
The arrogant façade of the fascistic American criminal justice system that had been infiltrated by the Clinton-Obama Democratic party has been torn down and the director and deputy director of the FBI revealed as potential felons who will possibly have their own day in the kangaroo courts they so delighted in sending less deservedly accused to face. There are many vicissitudes but the American leviathan is, however awkwardly and inelegantly, reviving. But the most salient aspect of it is not the war on and travails of Trump, but the fact that the national media have shot their bolt every day for 34 months since he announced his candidacy for president. The media threw their obligation to retain some element of fairness and detachment aside, and gambled everything on poisoning the wells and polluting public opinion so badly (as they did with Richard Nixon, but he had no idea how to deal with it) that the people’s choice (by the narrowest of margins and in a stunning surprise) would be overturned. They gambled and they have lost.
My point is not to promote Trump; it is the colossal failure of the press, and the widespread extent of this phenomenon.
Is any of that news? Or did we already know that?
Wow! Maybe the worst, lie filled, biased post from another author I have ever seen you put up. However, he is totally correct about Nixon. He was a really great guy and innocent of any wrongdoing. It was that awful press that brought him down.
Also, what has the FBI done that was corrupt?
Finally, suppose that the press was totally neutral on Trump. What would they do differently?
Steve
I don’t think they’d do anything different about Trump. What, you think they can do more than 90% negative coverage? I think they’d’ve treated Hillary Clinton and the DNC less deferentially than they did. Based on what the talking heads had to say this morning, they think they should have treated her more deferentially and treated the DNC’s fecklessness more sympathetically. Keep in mind that one of the revelations of the last several months, underreported if anything in the media, is that the Clinton campaign and the DNC engaged in a corrupt conspiracy to evade the campaign finance laws (turning money raised by the state parties over to the Clinton campaign so it could be spent on the campaign).
What has the FBI done? Other than strategic leaking and perjury?
What lies, steve? Be specific.
Let’s go through this paragaph:
True.
Opinion, too early to tell.
Opinion.
I think that’s true but considering the opposite view most charitably, it’s opinion.
That’s true.
Too soon to tell. Opinion.
Or this
In terms of GDP growth and unemployment that’s true, continuing the trend of 2016. Misleading, maybe.
In terms of via the southern border it’s true. It might be misleading.
Overstated.
To date no evidence of collusion has been presented. The best conjecture is that the statement is either true or a matter of opinion.
Isn’t that what Comey has acknowledged?
Isn’t that literally true? Maybe the “degenerated”, “absurd” and “peppy” parts are opinion or exaggerated. He’s a Brit. That’s how they do polemic.
Speculative. “No ungentlemanliness” is rather clearly false. Gentlemen don’t cheat on their wives.
True.
That’s clearly opinion. I think it’s largely true. Maybe one Pinocchio.
In summary, a mixture of truth, opinion, and exaggeration but few lies. I love a good polemic.
Is this what you object to?
You’re missing something. It is possible for Nixon to have been a bad guy and that the press was unfairly against him. I think that’s pretty obviously the case although I was in Europe for most of the Watergate scandal. He’s echoing the perspective that prevailed in Europe: the entire thing was enormously exaggerated here.
I guess I am less generous about unsubstantiated opinion. Read this quickly while cooking at church this morning and on re-read I guess you could make the case that some is extreme hyperbole, like “The arrogant façade of the fascistic American criminal justice system that had been infiltrated by the Clinton-Obama Democratic party”, but when you look at the facts as released so far, what you had was an FBI that was leaking and talking about the Clinton investigations, while saying nothing about the ongoing Trump investigation. That doesn’t fit with what you would really expect Clinton-Obama people to do. That seems more like lying. Or “, and the gigantic canard of Trump collusion with Russia has collapsed.” If you claim Trump is definitely guilty, that is a lie. If you say he is definitely innocent, as this does, that tis also a lie. We won’t know until the investigation is done.
I guess polemics are a matter of taste. Would be a lot shorter if he just said “I think Trump is the greatest and never lies, anything the press says about him is false and Clinton and Obama suck. ” It would take less time and be just as subtle.
Steve
I take it this was one of those hostile second-generation immigrant authors you were so concerned about in a later post?
“We haven’t learned that the Justice Department in general and the FBI in particular are corrupt and thoroughly politicized. Anyone who’d been paying attention already knew that.”
It might be useful to separate rank and file from the leadership in that characterization. Further, unless one believes that the signatories to the FISA court request actually believe the content in the dossier – and if so may god take pity on your poor soul – I’m not aware of such a blatant use of their authority and collaboration of the institutions to attempt to alter a US presidential election.
“attempt to alter a US presidential election.”
It was not used to try to alter a presidential election. The investigation of Trump was kept quiet until after the election. The Clinton investigation was heavily leaked, but doubt you care about that.
Steve
I think the extent of the FBI/DOJ and possibly CIA corruption have been revealed in a way that was not known before.