View from the Crystal Ball

Kyle Kondik, writing at Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball makes two points:

  1. Republicans are likely to take control of the House of Representatives
  2. At present all of the momentum is in the Republicans’ favor

To the first point:

So our main question about the House continues to be not whether Republicans will flip the House — although we would not completely shut the door on Democrats’ retaining control if the political environment improves markedly — but rather how big the Republicans’ eventual majority will be.

and to the second:

Toward that end, we are making 11 House rating changes, all in favor of Republicans. Let’s go through them, and then we’ll take a look at the overall House picture.

concluding:

As of this writing, redistricting remains incomplete in Florida, Missouri, and New Hampshire. However, for the sake of argument, let’s assume the following: 1. Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) gets his way, and Republican state legislators approve his recently proposed map, where we’d rate 20 districts at least leaning Republican and 8 at least leaning Democratic; 2. Missouri eventually adopts a map that preserves 6 Republican-leaning seats and 2 Democratic-leaning ones; and 3. New Hampshire passes a map with 1 Democratic-leaning seat and 1 Toss-up.

If that happens, and no other state maps change due to legal action, here would be our topline ratings: 210 seats would be rated Safe, Likely, or Leans Republican, 198 would be rated Safe, Likely, or Leans Democratic, and 27 would be rated as Toss-ups.

Given the political environment, we’d expect Republicans to do quite well among the Toss-up races. Let’s say, for the sake of argument, they win 20 of the 27. That would result in a 230-205 Republican House, or a net gain of 17 from what Republicans won in 2020.

To be honest, that seems a little light in terms of Republican gains. If we had to guess, today, what Republicans would net in the House, we’d probably pick a number in the 20s. So that means our ratings are probably at least a little bit friendlier to Democrats than perhaps they should be. However, we do have several more seats rated Leans Democratic (15) compared to Leans Republican (8), which is one way of indicating how the playing field could grow. On the other hand, our ratings also reflect the possibility of a Democratic comeback in which they limit Republican advances.

Short of a Wayback Machine, I don’t believe there’s much that Democrats can to about the situation at this point. Many of the factors pushing things in the Republicans’ favor are long-term or structural matters; others are materially beyond their control. One thing I have noticed lately is that the surest way for President Biden to bolster his approval rating or, at least, to keep it from descending farther is to maintain a low profile. That doesn’t bode well for a more activist posture between now and November being helpful to Democrats.

9 comments… add one
  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    To put things in perspective.

    In 1994, Republicans won 230 seats (+54); in 2006, Democrats won 233 seats (+31); in 2010, Republicans won 242 seats (+63); in 2018, Democrats won 235 seats (+41).

    A 230 seat majority (+17) would be a very mild rebuke to Democrats; compared to past elections.

    I noticed they didn’t mention the Senate. I will think Democrats are going to gain seats there.

    All in all, I don’t see why Democrats should be troubled with how things are shaping up in November.

  • The linked article is just about the House. Their present assessment of the Senate suggests that Democrats would need to sweep the “toss-up” seats for the Democrats to have a majority. A Republican majority is more likely.

    The point of this post is equally about the status and the trend. The trend is moving towards the Republicans. Majorities in both the House and Senate would pose a problem for Biden and the Democrats.

  • Andy Link

    Curious,

    I think political sorting and gerrymandering, which have reduced the number of competitive seats, are what is likely to result in a very mild rebuke. IOW, structural reasons are giving both parties a significantly high floor.

  • steve Link

    “The trend is moving towards the Republicans.”

    It’s the off year election. I hope this isn’t news to anyone.

    Steve

  • There are differences between this midterm and ordinary midterm elections. For one thing the Democrats’ margins in both houses of Congress are razor-thin. Historically, that’s something of an anomaly when the White House changes hands.

    Second, the Democrats have not behaved as though they understood that for the last two years. If President Biden had been the president he ran on being, I don’t believe they’d be in quite as bad a shape as they are. The evidence is that people voted for “normalcy” not transformation.

  • Drew Link

    “Short of a Wayback Machine, I don’t believe there’s much that Democrats can to about the situation at this point.”

    I think that’s correct. Key issues cannot really be turned around or have faded in importance: inflation (the die is cast), the virus was not eliminated (no Wayback Machine), crime (its on any TV station willing to play it), the politically correct hysteria surrounding BLM (exposed), things got in the way of immigration but this issue will increase with the upcoming debacle. Education polls low, but as the Virginia race showed, indoctrination was key.

    And I think people have taken a measure of Biden and realize there was a reason they hid him during the 2020 campaign. Just not up to the task.

    So the only issue is how much Biden tars congressional candidates.

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    A helpful thing would be to set benchmarks to interpret the results.

    Democrats retain majority — the Republican Party are about to be “Whigged”
    Republican majority 230 (+17) — a very mild rebuke
    Republican majority 240 (+27) — a typical midterm that’s occurred to the last 4 Presidents
    Republican majority 250 (+37) — unusually severe rebuke

  • I agree that metrics are good but your proposal doesn’t take into account the structural changes in the House. I would reduce all of the numbers by 10.

  • Jan Link

    There couldn’t be a greater contrast of posts than the ones submitted by Drew versus the one by CuriousOnlooker.

    Drew’s innumerates the many dire, disappointing byproducts arising from the Biden presidency. Each example given produces a public heartache. One not included is the increase of OD’s, mainly attributed to the unrestrained trafficking of fentanyl and other drugs across our “open border” by drug cartels. More have died from drug ODs, in the 18-45 age range, than from a virus that has been on media/political speed dial for years, while the fentanyl crisis has received only a whisper of commentary by either the democrat or Republican parties.

    CO, on the other hand, dwells on the statistical data of past election cycles, almost like one would consider a wining or losing hand in Vegas. Somehow, I find such an analysis cold, without heart, in being aware of all the distress caused by the current administration’s actions and stupid policies being implemented since January 2021.

    Having said this, I’m not going to entertain an outcome prediction. There are just too many unseemly variables to consider: the tight lid put on information disbursal by social and legacy media giants; the large number of low information voters (especially those who are all-in receiving government subsidies); and the inability to conduct a honest vote count because of being manipulated by a mail-in ballot system (most western countries see as being a source of greater fraud), questionable machines counting the votes, and a weakened chain of custody of the votes being submitted as the valid will of the people.

Leave a Comment