Top Ten Stupid Things About the Sequester

After the first several of these are in no particular order.

1. That sequestration is happening at all.

Once again, I’m reminded of the “chicken” scene in Rebel Without a Cause.

2. The House Republican position

The idea that we can (or should) achieve a balanced budget without any additional revenue, even by closing loopholes that should be closed, without cutting Medicare, and without cutting defense is unquestionably one of the stupidest thing about the sequester.

3. The White House position

The notion that the White House has no discretion in how it implements sequestration is remarkably bone-headed.

4. The Senate Democrats’ position

The Senate Democrats’ refusal to accept any reductions in Social Security or Medicare is just plain nuts. Additionally, budgets aren’t death pacts. They’re planning documents. The Senate’s refusal to produce a budget is beneath disdain.

5. Threatening to cancel the White House Easter egg roll

Does anybody but the White House really believe that will convince people of the desperate necessity of getting rid of the sequester?

6. Arne Duncan’s pink slip remark.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan’s dire warning about teachers being laid off as a consequence of sequestration is without question one of the dumbest things. If anything, it bolstered the case that the White House was exaggerating the effects of the sequester which is probably the opposite of what he intended.

7. The president denying that he proposed the sequester

This has been so widely debunked I’m amazed that people are still arguing over it.

8. The Congressional Republicans denying that they had anything to do with the sequester.

Ditto.

9. Maxine Waters’s warning

You can hardly lampoon Maxine Waters’s warning that 170 million jobs could be lost as a result of sequestration.

10. The idea that we can’t trim 2.4% from a $3.6 trillion budget without dire consequences.

Feel free to contribute to the list.

19 comments… add one
  • I failed to mention “using the word ‘sequester’ as a noun”.

  • sam Link

    Ah, well, English is pretty liberal in allowing its speakers to use verbs as nouns. Even the reverse. Hell, I saw someone using ‘synecdoche’ as a verb…

  • Hey! Transforming a noun into a verb using the regular rules is legit. 😉 Especially when used semi-humorously.

  • Cstanley Link

    Some of your list items could overlap with this, but my disgust is over the time and energy put into political posturing instead of solutions to make rational cuts. On the WH side it is the Firemen First strategery (aka “so sorry that the GOP is killing the Easter Bunny and school field trips, kids!”) while the GOP scours the federal budget to highlight the most ludicrous items like studies of obese lesbians.

    Partisanship over policy has been on display for quite a while, but this seems to have reached an unprecedented level. They’re not even pretending otherwise now. Why in the world would any kid today want to grow up to be in politics, with this asininity?

  • Basically our elected leaders are stuck on stupid….what a shock.

    Congratulations folks you voted for these weasels.

  • jan Link

    I second CStanley’s above post, in how obvious it is that selective cuts are seemingly being made to emphasis pain in order to blame our tattered economical conditions on one or the other party.

    For instance, while the Dept. of Education is cutting federally-funded schools on Native America reservations, they are busy adding a new high-paying job in the federal government
    promoting educational excellence for African Americans.

    Kyle Olson, founder of the Michigan-based education watchdog Education Action Group, had this to say:

    “It seems like there’s no rhyme or reason for the cuts that they’re making,” Olson said. “They are trying to maximize the public effect — the pain — in order to make their point. But the fact of the matter is, the sequester is not a cut, it is a reduction in the rate of growth. The choices they’re making are absurd.”

    Also, in #4, the bulls-eye observation was:

    Additionally, budgets aren’t death pacts. They’re planning documents.

  • Icepick Link

    Hey, of all the people I’ve ever voted for, only one is still in office, and I voted for him in 2010 with the express purpose of ‘retiring’ Alan Grayson. Which retirement didn’t take, but that’s because Washington Dems and their big money backers always want another loud-mouthed drunk-driving asshole in power. (Unfortunately, Grayson hasn’t killed anybody, so he’s not perfect.) They can’t get enough of those, especially with the lesser Kennedys not taking their appointed offices like they should.

  • Icepick Link

    Why in the world would any kid today want to grow up to be in politics, with this asininity?

    Because that’s where the power is, and money too. So if you’re not pretty enough for Hollywood and not smart enough (or connected enough) for Wall Street, politics is the way to go!

  • michael reynolds Link

    I’m liking the sequester. I think this is absolutely the way we should operate from now on. The two sides double dare each other to manage problems in the stupidest way possible, and then, they do it!

    I think while they’re on a roll they should do tax reform in the stupidest way possible. Granted that might result in the same set-up we have now, but I think with some encouragement they could go even dumber.

  • jan Link

    Michael

    One of your more clever and enjoyable posts. It all reminds me of playground rules.

  • jan Link

    Maybe this too can be tied to the painful distribution of sequester monies, and who is getting paid what. Ah yes, the War on Women Syndrome has now infected the other side of the aisle.

  • Icepick Link

    Apparently they laid off the guy on the Presidential detail that knows which kind of fuel to put in the Presidential limo.

    For the file marked: Age of Competence.

  • I think while they’re on a roll they should do tax reform in the stupidest way possible.

    Sadly, I think that’s change you can probably rely on.

  • I think while they’re on a roll they should do tax reform in the stupidest way possible.

    What makes you think they are operating any other way?

    Seriously, putting aside my libertarian/anarchist craziness here….

    There are a number of tax proposals out there that would simplify our tax code (i.e. save money and resources…lots of them) and many of those would also likely boost economic growth, at least in the short run as deadweight loss is reduced.

    Why don’t we do this? Because our elected scumbags are responsible to their constituents…the people who pay for their re-election campaigns. And guess who that includes:

    tax attorneys,
    tax preparers,
    companies that get tax breaks.

    And keep in mind, I’m not calling any of our elected scumbags stupid…just that their pursuit of their own self-interests gives us boneheaded policy.

  • jan Link

    For the file marked: Age of Competence.

    Obama’s broken down limo is symbolism at it’s finest.

  • Drew Link

    I simply note, wrt #2, that when you have, for 50 years, had Lucy pulling the football out…………you might be hesitant about taxes without real spending reduction. Just sayin.

  • steve Link

    Link to best cartoon ever on verbing nouns.

    http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2013/01/28

    Steve

  • sam Link

    Recursive function theory in action:

    Link to best cartoon ever on verbing nouns.

    http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2013/01/28

  • jan Link

    Calvin and Hobbs — the purveyors of some the best wry wisdom, ever!

Leave a Comment