Sometimes you’ve got to read a lot of op-ed to find a few sentences that are worth considering. I found these acorns in a Wall Street Journal op-ed from Gerald O’Driscoll, Jr.:
The Fed’s monetary policy of extraordinarily low interest rates helped create the asset bubbles in stock and commodity prices that are now bursting. Low rates also distorted investment decisions.
The second sentence isn’t at all controversial. That’s exactly what Fed policy over the last eight years has been intended to do. And the first sentence flows from the second. When you combine excess Chinese demand with what’s called “accommodating” Fed policy, you get a commodities bubble. That’s a lot of deadweight loss.
I don’t think the foreign debt China owes is likely to be troublesome for China. No one knows how much it is but it’s probably a drop in the bucket compared to the $28 trillion of debt in the country.
It will be more difficult for other, smaller economies.
Meanwhile, IMO in the long run the deadweight loss will probably be more problematic but in the short run foreign debt is more likely to cause the global “meltdown” the op-ed is purportedly about.
Speaking of distortion, how about this from the WashPo:
The U.S. was supposed to leave Afghanistan by 2017. Now it might take decades.
Good times, good times!
Basically, this is Obamacare all over again. Obama slammed Hillary’s healthcare proposals in the primaries and then essentially adopted them once elected. Now he’s adopting McCain’s stance on Afghanistan taking 100 years to get it right.
I expect to be on a full war footing in Iraq before the year is out….