The Reality Sinks In

I strongly recommend Ruy Teixeira’s analysis of the fix in which the House progressives have placed the Democratic Party which he characterizes as “How Not to Build a Coalition”. Key points include

  1. Increasing turnout hasn’t worked.
  2. Clumping blacks, Hispanics, and Asians together as “people of color” hasn’t worked.
  3. The majority of Americans reject “cultural leftism”.
  4. Promoting the notion that there’s a “crisis of democracy” hasn’t worked.
  5. Promoting the notion that the there’s a dire need for radical transformation in the United States hasn’t worked.

Here are a few important snippets:

In the 2020 election, running against Donald Trump (Donald Trump!) and in the wake of a social upheaval after George Floyd’s murder that associated the Democratic party closely with a left stance on the centrality of “systemic racism” to pretty much every policy issue…the Democrats actually lost ground among nonwhite voters. They lost 7 margin points from their 2016 margin among black voters and a stunning 16 points from their 2016 margin among Hispanics (Catalist two party vote) The black share of voters in 2020 was actually slightly smaller than the black share in 2016 because, while black turnout did go up, it did not go up as much as other groups. Overall, nonwhite voters contributed less to Biden’s margin over Trump in 2020 than they did to Clinton’s margin over Trump in 2016.

and

The left in the Democratic party insists that cultural leftism is central to consolidating the “rising American electorate” that will power the Democratic party to dominance in an increasingly multicultural, multiracial America. It is a feature they say, not a bug, of current Democratic practice.

But in the process, the left has managed to associate the Democratic party with a series of views on crime, immigration, policing, schooling, free speech and of course race and gender that are quite far from those of the median voter. That’s a success for the left but the hard reality is that it’s an electoral liability for the Democratic party.

What should be done? The party should focus on popularism—ideas that are popular with most Americans, without poison pills, “gotchas”, or extras. There are plenty of them like DACA, and voter ID. It’s been said that the Republicans are looking for converts while the Democrats are busy searching for heretics. Stop looking for heretics. Abandon vanguardism. That’s the path to becoming a boutique party.

The reason that Democrats have control of the cities is that historically they’ve “brought home the bacon”, i.e. people in those cities benefited. Increasingly, they’re voting Democrat through force of habit. That won’t persist forever. Without reinforcement habits are extinguished.

And for goodness sake don’t just write off getting Republican votes in Congress. Strategies that have been used successfully for 200 years haven’t been tried and found wanting. They’ve been found to violate the Marcusist principles of the Congressional progressives and not tried.

6 comments… add one
  • Drew Link

    Paul Waldman in the Washington Post attempts to make the case that the Dem party has moved wholesale to the left, the voters of the country have moved to the left, and Joe Biden is simply reflecting that. Shorter: it ain’t the left’s fault.

    In an earlier comment I referenced being tethered to reality. I would suggest Mr Waldman is not.

  • PD Shaw Link

    I was pretty shocked by this survey in an NBER paper on Perceptions of Racial Gaps (pdf):

    “There are some stark and widespread misperceptions. For instance, regardless of race, all respondents overestimate the share of Black people in the US. The average perception is 42%, when the reality is 13%. Republicans over-estimate the share only slightly more than Democrats do. The answers do exhibit coherent patterns: when asked about the share of Black people in their zip code, white respondents decrease their estimated percentage of Black people, while Black respondents increase it.”

    “Respondents across the board also dramatically overestimate the shares of both Black and white people with a [four-year] college degree.” Eyeballing the chart on page 43 it looks like Americans think 43% of blacks have college degrees when its actually 25%, and that 60% of whites have college degrees when its actually 39%.

    I think the misperceptions differ only slightly btw/ whites & blacks, republicans and democrats in the context of how far off they all are, but it does make me think that this identifies a source of a lot of misjudgments on electoral strategies/legislation.

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    I don’t have such gloom on the Democrats even if they keep their current course.

    The heights of the academy, media, industry, and the wealthy are all overwhelmingly Democratic. They will drive the bus for a long while yet.

    And the Republican party is a feuding mess and has no coherent agenda. Even if the Republicans can figure out how to political power in DC again, they would repeat what they did during Trump’s presidency, fractions that didn’t look in charge of the Federal government even if in “power” and couldn’t agree on anything except a tax cut. I doubt anyone is going to switch their vote from D to vote for this dysfunction.

    PD : on the share of people who have a college degree. Remember, practically everyone one sees in media has a college degree. College degree is also status / class symbol (of being middle class). That’s a natural bias to inflate the numbers. I wouldn’t be surprised as well there is response bias, college educated are usually the most reliable voters, it wouldn’t surprise me if they are also most likely to respond to polls.

  • Andy Link

    I’m mostly with Curious. The Democrats may underperform for a while, but in our binary system, they will always be able to recover and compete because of negative partisanship. And also the GoP is a hot mess.

    The exception is the Senate where I think the GoP will have a structural advantage for quite a while. Democrats are still shedding rural voters like crazy and they, as a collective, seem more interested in whining about the unfairness of the Senate than actually making changes that would make them more competitive.

    My biggest concern is that the parties are so weak as institutions that they are open to being captured. That’s what happened with Trump and the GoP and there is nothing stopping a Democratic Socialist from taking over the Democratic party in the same way and fundamentally changing its character.

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    Even the Senate is not really that good for Republicans.

    Contrary to all the pundits, I continue to see Republicans at a structural disadvantage in 2022. They have open seats in NC (purple state), OH (purple state), PA (blue state), weak incumbent in WI (45%), an 88 year old incumbent in IA, and another purple seat (FL). Murkowski has alienated her state party (AK) which could split the Republican vote.

    Its not inconceivable Republicans lose 3-4 seats in the Senate in Nov.

  • Drew Link

    CO

    Perhaps. Here’s a $20 that says you are wrong.

Leave a Comment