The Failure of the Security Council to Condemn the Attack on Ukraine

As is no surprise the United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine failed. Russia vetoed it. The Joint Statement Following a Vote on a UN Security Council Resolution on Russia’s Aggression Toward Ukraine says (complete text):

This afternoon, the Security Council voted on a resolution to hold Russia accountable for its aggression against Ukraine, to protect civilians, including children, and call for the facilitation of rapid, safe, and unhindered humanitarian assistance to those in need.

This resolution was vital and straightforward. Fundamentally, it was about whether the countries on the Security Council – charged with maintaining international peace and security – believe in upholding the UN Charter.

The UN Charter was written with the express purpose of preventing a war like the one President Putin just started. This war has brought, in just its first days, devastating losses of life – and Russia alone is accountable.

President Putin chose to violate Ukraine’s sovereignty. President Putin chose to violate international law. President Putin chose to violate the UN Charter. President Putin chose to drop bombs on Kyiv, to force families to stuff their lives into backpacks and shelter in subway stations. President Putin is the aggressor here. There is no middle ground.

We believe we have a particular responsibility to stand up to this violation of the UN Charter because Russia is a Permanent Member of the Security Council who is culpable. Those of us standing here today continue to believe in the Security Council’s solemn duty and highest purpose – to prevent conflict and avert the scourge of war.

Russia has abused its power today to veto our strong resolution. But Russia cannot veto our voices. Russia cannot veto the Ukrainian people. Russia cannot veto their own people protesting this war in the streets. Russia cannot veto the UN Charter. Russia cannot, and will not, veto accountability.

We thank the Member States who signed on as co-sponsors of this resolution for standing with Ukraine and with the UN Charter today.

We will be taking this matter to the General Assembly, where the Russian veto does not apply and the nations of the world will continue to hold Russia accountable.

and I agree with it. China abstained from the vote. I also agree with the statement of our ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, to the effect that it was our responsibility to condemn the invasion as well as Russia’s veto of the resolution. I will link to the statement when I find its text online.

As the resolution says the primary purpose of the United Nations was to prevent wars “like the one President Putin just started”. The situation with respect to our invasion of Iraq is not precisely analogous since, to the best of my knowledge, no resolution condemning the invasion was ever brought to the Security Council. In this case a resolution has been brought and vetoed by a permanent member of the council.

The UN has failed in its primary purpose. As we are learning to our sorrow, its charter assumed the continuing benign hegemony of the United States and that is becoming less the case nearly with every passing day. In theory the UN could still be useful is a forum for cooperating on issues but the presence of egregious human rights violators on the commission for human rights and other examples too numerous to mention call that into question as well.

1 comment… add one
  • PD Shaw Link

    UN Security Council Resolution 1441 unanimously gave Iraq “a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations.” It is disputed whether the Resolution was self-executing, but there was never going to be a condemnation resolution because it would have had to invoke unbecoming non-substantive process issues.

Leave a Comment