The Europeans Have Never Understood Us

I have a number of points of disagreement with the observations of Walter Russell Mead in his most recent Wall Street Journal column. For example:

After almost two years of Covid-induced absence from Paris and Berlin, I returned to the old world to make a surprising discovery: Europe no longer understands the United States. Between Washington’s shift to the Indo-Pacific, the lingering effects of the Trump presidency (along with fears of a return in 2024), and confusing signals emanating from the Biden administration, neither the Germans nor French know what to expect anymore. That uncertainty further complicates the difficult task of recasting the Atlantic alliance for a turbulent new era.

Let’s stop with that first paragraph. In the earliest part of my career I had the opportunity of living and working in Germany and being immersed in what Germans thought of the U. S. Since then I have worked in the UK and in Italy. Believe me when I say that Europeans have never understood the U. S. There are all sorts of reasons for it including that European elites are actually elite and craft their countries’ foreign policies accordingly with a facility about which American diplomats can only dream. Dr. Mead provides a good explanation:

American interests are global, and American presidents, like it or not, can’t confine their attention to a single world theater. During the Cold War, Western Europe was the primary focus of American foreign policy, but the U.S. also fought two major wars in Asia. The energy crisis has already forced President Biden to pay more attention to the Middle East. China’s efforts to gain influence in the Middle East and Europe will draw Washington’s attention toward its old NATO partners, as will Moscow’s continued alignment with Beijing.

but I fear that may reflect another misunderstanding on his part. For Europeans Europe is the center of the world and they can’t imagine how anyone could think anything else. Germany is focused on Germany to a degree I presume would horrify most Americans.

He continues:

Europeans also have a hard time grasping what the U.S. wants from its old allies in this new struggle. Britain, France and even Germany have sent token military forces to the Pacific this year. Americans appreciate the spirit behind these gestures, but European assistance in the Pacific means less to the U.S. than many Europeans, accustomed to American eagerness for allied participation in places like Afghanistan, expect.

I don’t believe that. I think the German leaders, French leaders, etc. understand quite well what we want from them. However, as Joschka Fischer put it, what they don’t know is how they can keep their jobs if they do what we want.

My advice to Americans is somewhat different than Dr. Mead’s:

To some degree these misunderstandings are due both to the isolation and emotional stress of the pandemic, and with the resumption of travel they will begin to fade. But to the degree that distorted perceptions inform European policy, Americans should think harder about communicating effectively with old allies even as we prepare for new challenges ahead.

I think we should be more concerned about American interests and far less interested in Europe’s interests than are the Europeans. If we pursue our own actual interests (which I think are quite limited) rather than pursuing European, German, British, Israeli, etc. interests, that will be more than enough.

2 comments… add one
  • bob sykes Link

    The fact that we pursue Israel’s interest, even to the damage of our own is self-evident. Over 300 members of Congress are enthusiastically enlisted in the Israel cause.

    Whether we support Europe’s interests is open to dispute. Nord Stream II is clearly in Germany’s interest, especially because of the self-inflicted disaster that is Energiewende. Europe as a whole needs Russian gas (and wheat). It does not need a war with Russia, which our elites seem eager to start.

    For now, our elites are focused on war with China. Nearly every day, the Wall Street Journal publishes a long article on how necessary Taiwan is to the US survival. Today’s issue described how helpless Taiwan is, with demoralized, untrained, poorly equipped Taiwanese troops. The explicit conclusion being that Taiwan is lost if the US will not fight China for it.

    Meade, like many of our intelligentsia, is basically insane. But he is useful as an indicator of what is on the elites mind. Galston is another shill for the elites, and even Hanson has joined them. All in all, the WSJ is today’s principal example of 19th Century Yellow Journalism. Hearst got us/US and empire. The WSJ will get us radioactive ash heaps where once our cities stood.

  • bob sykes Link

    Please excuse the double post.

    Since you are so kind as to provide the great service of widely reading what the elites are saying, may I suggest you sometimes read Moon of Alabama, apparently written by a German. It is essentially an anti-American Empire screed.

    Today’s interesting comments are really extended quotes a la The Glittering Eye:

    https://www.moonofalabama.org/2021/10/on-the-delusion-in-us-foreign-policy-and-what-might-change-it.html#more

Leave a Comment