In 1965 Gene Moore, president of Intel, noted that the number of transistors in an integrated circuit was doubling every year and went on to project that would persist for ten years. In 1975 he downgraded that to doubling every two years and that projection held true until 2012. The rate of increase has ratcheted down again and the end of “Moore’s Law” as it’s called is now in sight. From IEEE Spectrum:
Two of the world’s largest foundries—Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and Samsung—announced in April that they’d climbed one more rung on the Moore’s Law ladder. TSMC spoke first, saying its 5-nanometer manufacturing process is now in what’s called “risk productionâ€â€”the company believes it has finished the process, but initial customers are taking a chance that it will work for their designs. Samsung followed quickly with a similar announcement.
TSMC says its 5-nm process offers a 15 percent speed gain or a 30 percent improvement in power efficiency. Samsung is promising a 10 percent performance improvement or a 20 percent efficiency improvement. Analysts say these figures are in line with expectations. Compared, though, with the sometimes 50 percent improvements of a decade ago, it’s clear that Moore’s Law is not what it used to be. But judging by the investments big foundries are making, customers still think it’s worthwhile.
The number of 5nm foundries is decreasing which suggests that the research and development that might lead to 3nm manufacturing id declining as well.
For decades software developers have been relying on better, faster, cheaper hardware to redeem their inefficient designs. Today’s developers rarely have the skills necessary to produce efficient software and almost never have the time that it requires.
On to quantum computing.
Didn’t Intel give up on 5 nm. We must be getting close to the point that quantum effects start showing up, messing up the calculations.
Now who, besides the Chinese, is working on building a real, functioning quantum computer. There are lost of simulators out there running on conventional computers, and I believe a few attempts at making qubit processors have been made, but I don’t think anyone is near building a quantum computer.
Quantum computing has been just around the corner since I was in grad school. As I understand it there are presently two commercial vendors of quantum computers: D-Wave (2,000 qu-bits) and IBM (20 qu-bits).
Probably still not just around the corner.
Yes, Intel dropped out of the 5nm business.
Intel has not dropped off Moore’s Law.
Intel’s 10nm is equivalent to TSMC and Samsung’s 7nm (which is current their greatest in production node.
Intel’s 7nm is equivalent to between 3-5nm for the other 2 companies.
Intel’s issue is the disaster of the last 4 years; they used to be ahead of TSMC and Samsung by 2. Now they are behind by a year or so, and just started moving again.
Blame Intel management for their predicament.
The computer science geeks we work with are pretty skeptical about quantum computing on the hardware side. Son looked at working with a group in Canada that is working on it but came away convinced he would spend 10 years on the research and come away with nothing to show for it. ( He and his friends did some that was supposedly going to help with security issues for quantum computers if they ever work. They stopped because they all came to the same conclusion that it was too far away.)
Steve