In his regular Washington Post column David Ignatius interprets the meeting between Chinese and American diplomats that took place in Alaska last week:
The Chinese initially appeared almost cocky in Anchorage, with Yang lecturing his hosts about the United States’ moral and diplomatic shortcomings. This message was probably intended to impress the domestic audience back in China about Beijing’s resolve. But behind this outward confidence, the Chinese seemed peeved that before the Anchorage meeting Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin had traveled to China’s backyard to visit neighboring Japan and South Korea.
The Biden administration’s emphasis on “the Quad†— the informal U.S. partnership with India, Japan and Australia — has at least modestly bolstered the United States’ position in the region. India, in particular, has moved further and faster than U.S. officials expected. And Japan, though feeling its way under new Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, remains a committed partner.
China faces a paradox in Asia: The stronger and more confident it becomes, the more it frightens its neighbors and pushes them toward Washington. That’s why the United States’ recent political disarray worries its Asian allies: Against a rising China, they don’t want to bet on a fading superpower.
That’s certainly one interpretation of the meeting but I think there are others. First, trying to put an opponent on the back foot is a pretty standard tactic in Chinese diplomacy. Keeping high-ranking U. S. officials waiting on the tarmc; sending lower ranking officials to meet with the president when he visits. I’ve made my own suggestions about counter-signalling but the White House pays no attention to me.
The Chinese leadership recognizes that the Biden Administration is sensitive about the events surrounding the election and its aftermath. They also think that the openness of our society and diversity are weaknesses rather than strengths. Of course they’ll probe along those areas. Whether they’re right about those things remains to be seen.
But I’m more concerned about what they do rather than what they say and I don’t believe their actions show as much confidence as their scolding of American diplomats might suggest.
The Trump Administration re-energized the Indo-Pacific Quad Coalition, becoming especially involved into solidifying the U.S.’s relationship with India. Some people call this coalition a “mini NATO.†But, whether or not the Biden Administration can keep these nations together by cultivating the mutual respect they had with Trump I think is questionable. There have already been a number of foreign policy missteps and weak messenging exhibited by Biden and his crew, between Russia, now China, and seemingly capitulation to Iran.
The stupidity of Ignatius’ essay passes over to outright lying. Blinken opened the meeting with insults regarding the Uighurs, Hong Kong, Taiwan, intellectual theft, and other matters. This is common practice by US representatives. In the past the Chinese representatives either ignored the insults or made some mild reply. This time they came loaded for bear, and Blinken was completely confused (look at the tape) and taken aback. No doubt the Chinese reply was premeditated and planned. They were looking for an excuse to unload on the US, and Blinken gave it to them.
The US is conducting intense economic warfare with both Russia and China, and it is actively trying destroy important Russian and Chinese companies and assets. These are a reprise of the economic policies Roosevelt conducted against the Japanese in the late 30’s. These policies will inevitably lead to a shooting war with either one or the other or, worst case, both. We will lose any war with either Russia or China. Our casualties will be on the scale of WW I or WW II. In case you forgot. In WW I we suffered 11,000 dead and well over 20,000 wounded each month.
Three interesting tangents.
My mind keeps going back to a claim Biden repeatedly made during the campaign; “I (Biden) spent more time with him (Xi) I’m told than any world leader”.
If true; isn’t the converse true, that Xi has spent more time with Biden then any other leader. If Biden thinks he’s got the measure of Xi, its probable Xi thinks he’s got the measure of Biden. Are they both right, only one of them, neither?
Also, familiarity breeds contempt.
Lastly, this is a much more thought provoking article on American-Sino relations by Niall Ferguson.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-03-21/niall-ferguson-a-taiwan-crisis-may-end-the-american-empire
I don’t agree with some of it (the Chinese are much more “foxy” then Mr Ferguson makes them to be). But he is right about the dangers.