I don’t visit Vox.com very frequently because every time I do it’s quite obvious that I’m not its target audience. At Quillette Batya Ungar-Sargon analyzes how Ezra Klein and his partners (which used to include Matthew Yglesias) have turned their characteristic smugness into a business model:
Vox’s trademark style would be a cheeky, barely concealed smugness that flatters its readers into believing that by reading the website—which, not coincidentally, would sustain all of the liberal opinions that young, affluent, educated people already hold—they can rest assured that they are among the ranks of the correct, the informed, rather than one of the stupids.
In combining that smugness with a youthful, Whiggish optimism that equates information with progress, Klein figured out how to commodify being in the know in the social media age. After all, the point is not to know things so much as it is to broadcast that you know them. And the folks at Vox realized there was a goldmine to be had if they could turn sharing a Vox article on social media into the method whereby someone signaled their identity, the way a certain kind of person used to walk around with a New Yorker magazine peeking out of her handbag. In other words, Vox capitalized on one of the mainstays of the journalism status revolution: the anxiety members of broader elite classes have about whether they are elite enough.
Obviously, it’s a winning formula. There’s nothing like reinforcing what people already believe as self-evident unassailable fact to be popular with those people. Actual education requires changing what people already believe rather than challenging it.
How does this differ from right wing sites like zerohedge, Breitbart, etc that claim to be the only ones offering the truth? Has any conservative ever cited one of those w/o sounding smug? (Of course smug is in the ear of the beholder.)
Steve
How does it differ….Well it’s, it’s, it’s upscale and, and, and, and, er, trendy, plus it’s opinions are uniformly agreed upon to be trendily correct, that’s what.
I think this a fair assessment of Vox but it’s notable that Klein left shortly after Ygeslias—November 20 of last year—and now has a column and podcast at the New York Times. I rather like the podcast, although I only listen when the topic interests me.
This, from Klein’s departure note to the staff, reinforces your/Ungar-Sargon’s point:
I was aware that he was writing for the NYT; unaware he had left Vox.
Just a question; how is Vox’s business model different from the New York Times?
Maybe it’s me; but they both target the sensibilities of the same audience.
I would say less the same audience than an overlapping audience.
I would say that the NYT’s target audience is people who live on the Upper West Side or wish they did while Vox’s target audience is people under 40 who attended Ivy schools or wish they did.