Seize the Day

I completely agree with Sen. Gary Hart’s proposal in an op-ed in the New York Times:

We have recently come to learn of at least a hundred documents authorizing extraordinary presidential powers in the case of a national emergency, virtually dictatorial powers without congressional or judicial checks and balances. President Trump alluded to these authorities in March when he said, “I have the right to do a lot of things that people don’t even know about.” No matter who occupies the office, the American people have a right to know what extraordinary powers presidents believe they have. It is time for a new select committee to study these powers and their potential for abuse, and advise Congress on the ways in which it might, at a minimum, establish stringent oversight.

Secret powers began accumulating during the Eisenhower years and have grown by accretion ever since. The rationale originally was to permit a president to exercise necessary control in the case of nuclear war, an increasingly remote possibility since the Cold War’s end. An obscure provision in the Communications Act of 1934 empowers the president to suspend broadcast stations and other means of communication following a “proclamation by the President” of “national emergency.” Powers like these have been deployed sparingly: A few days after the Sept. 11 attacks, a proclamation declaring a national emergency, followed by an executive order days later, invoked some presidential powers, including the use of National Guard and U.S. military forces.

Senior members of both parties should convene hearings by first requesting, or if necessary, subpoenaing, the documents themselves. Those from previous administrations familiar with these documents should be called to testify, as well as current officials, including the national security adviser, the attorney general and the White House counsel.

The most obvious first question is why these far-reaching powers are kept secret, not only from Congress but also from the American people. The second question is why they are necessary at all. And ultimately, should not there be permanent congressional oversight of any suggestion for calling these powers into operation? Under what dire conditions should our system of checks and balances among the executive, legislative and judicial branches be abandoned in favor of a dictatorship? And once a dictatorship is declared, what would be required to return us to our historic democratic system of government?

We are being presented with a rare opportunity to correct the delegation of powers. Should Joe Biden be elected president there is no prospect whatever that the review being proposed would go forward. Similarly, if President Trump is re-elected and the Republicans regain control of the House, the same would apply.

A government of laws and of enumerated powers requires that we know what the heck the law actually is.

9 comments… add one
  • GreyShambler Link

    And even finding out who has detained you may take an attorney.
    https://golawenforcement.com/federal-law-enforcement-agencies/
    (Long list)
    I would agree with people in Portland that being arrested by unmarked agents in an unmarked vehicle is a pretty scary thought. News said they are actually wearing small patches identifying them as Homeland Security.
    But that wouldn’t make me feel any more secure.

    B.L.M. now has a SWAT team. Yes, but that would be Bureau of Land Management.
    https://www.nationalreview.com/2014/04/united-states-swat-john-fund/

  • walt moffett Link

    Is a mite frightening the bipartisan agreement for an executive who can bypass Congress and a similar bipartisan Congressional acquiescence.

  • steve Link

    “Should Joe Biden be elected president there is no prospect whatever that the review being proposed would go forward. ”

    Because? Pretty sure Hart is a Democrat. Wont see this addressed with the GOP in control, on that I agree. I can see Democrats addressing it at some point. Not sure how seriously. Would have been one fo the few reasons to support Bernie since I think he would have.

    Steve

  • Gary Hart is 83 years old and hasn’t held elective office for 33 years. He no more resembles today’s Democratic Party than Barry Goldwater is typical of today’s Republicans.

    When Gary Hart was in the Senate Nancy Pelosi was a meaningless backbencher with little or no influence. Can you cite an example when a Democratic Congress reduced the power of a sitting Democratic president? That’s why.

  • Andy Link

    “Can you cite an example when a Democratic Congress reduced the power of a sitting Democratic president?”

    Yeah, that says it all. And to me the evidence clearly shows that today neither party operates based on principles about governance, but on how they can use what power they have to further their agenda. It’s depressing how views on federalism align so neatly with who is in power and what their agenda is.

  • Guarneri Link

    “A government of laws and of enumerated powers requires that we know what the heck the law actually is.”

    Well, 50 years of relentless judicial activism has resulted in…….it depends. Your party champions that, Dave, to this day. I

  • steve Link

    I thought you were implying that there was something special about Biden that he would not want to give upon any of this.

    ” He no more resembles today’s Democratic Party”
    Certainly the Warren/Bernie wing. Among those who are more moderate, our congressperson thinks the Green New Deal is silly, doe snot support defunding the police, etc, I can see some support. Probably not enough to win a vote.

    Steve

  • Andy Link

    Let’s not forget that the only reason we are talking about Biden and now Sanders is because of moderate black voters.

  • TarsTarkas Link

    ‘Let’s not forget that the only reason we are talking about Biden and now Sanders is because of moderate black voters.’

    And as a reward Biden has for all practical purposes adopted Sanders’ and AOC’s planks in toto. Which even just a few of if imposed will impoverish moderate blacks (along with everybody else) in favor of the Connected.

Leave a Comment