John Halpin calls for a “party of responsible government”:
Events of the past week have clarified why America is in steady decline. One political party is determined to pass (perhaps today) a massive piece of partisan legislation that will explode federal budget deficits and kick millions of people off health care to finance tax cuts for the wealthiest households in the country, covered up by accounting gimmicks. The other party is rallying behind a guy to lead the largest city in America who, just a few short years ago, passionately described the end goal of politics as electing more socialists and “seizing the means of production.”
If you don’t think either of these approaches makes much sense, too bad, you’re old or out of touch or not MAGA enough or not “authentically” progressive. So-called populism, we’re told, is the only mode of politics. Anything goes, nothing matters, the crazier the better. Policies are just social media hooks. No one cares about good governance. Get with the program or get crushed.
There is an alternative method of politics consistent with our country’s long history and basic values. But it will require a true party of responsible government, which we currently do not have.
And we’re not going to get one. The parties we have are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party and no “responsible” upstart will arrive to save the day. We’re stuck with what we’ve got. The most a third party of responsible government will be to undermine the major party with which they have the most in common (and that may be different from state to state, locality to locality).
I’ve already explained why the Republicans and Democrats are so messed up. They are unable to enact federal legislation without intra-party compromised and some of their factions are quite extreme. Extremists on the Republican side include social conservatives and anarcho-capitalists. Those on the Democratic side include “democratic socialists” and some environmentalists. Compromises with such radicals are inevitably ugly and not particularly good policy.
I’ve been planning to post an additional observation on the psychology of elective office and this is as good a place as any. Running for elective office means you think that your being elected is good for the people. It’s one small step from that sentiment which every elected official has to believing that what is good for you, personally, is good for the people and that’s a step that nearly every politician takes. That’s why the Democratic Party has such a superannuated leadership. Not only do they believe they are good for the people but holding office is their business plan.
The entire West is experiencing a period of bad governance, which looks to be permanent, and which portends a major hegemonic shift, with the Russo-China bloc becoming the new hegemon.
Bad governance is progressive and irreversible, unless there is a revolution that sweeps away the old system. Russia made such a transition after the old Communist system fell, but there was a decade of extreme pain for the Russian people. Of course, maybe it was dumb luck. Putin came out of no where. And China lucked out with Deng, after the Maoists nearly destroyed the country.
Trump is not our Putin or Deng.
I think Morgan Housel had a fantastic quote that helps explain the underlying problem with our government:
“Politicians do not win elections to make policies; they make policies to win elections.”
This showed up in the so called Big Beautiful Bill.