Return With Us Now to Those Thrilling Days of Yesteryear…

At Project Syndicate Nouriel Roubini warns that stagflation shouldn’t be discounted:

NEW YORK – I have been warning for several months that the current mix of persistently loose monetary, credit, and fiscal policies will excessively stimulate aggregate demand and lead to inflationary overheating. Compounding the problem, medium-term negative supply shocks will reduce potential growth and increase production costs. Combined, these demand and supply dynamics could lead to 1970s-style stagflation (rising inflation amid a recession) and eventually even to a severe debt crisis.

Until recently, I focused more on medium-term risks. But now one can make a case that “mild” stagflation is already underway. Inflation is rising in the United States and many advanced economies, and growth is slowing sharply, despite massive monetary, credit, and fiscal stimulus.

There is now a consensus that the growth slowdown in the US, China, Europe, and other major economies is the result of supply bottlenecks in labor and goods markets. The optimistic spin from Wall Street analysts and policymakers is that this mild stagflation will be temporary, lasting only as long as the supply bottlenecks do.

True to form Dr. Roubini is less optimistic:

But what if this optimistic view is incorrect, and the stagflationary pressure persists beyond this year? It is worth noting that various measures of inflation are not just well above target but also increasingly persistent. For example, in the US, core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, is likely still to be near 4% by year’s end. Macro policies, too, are likely to remain loose, judging by the Biden administration’s stimulus plans and the likelihood that weak eurozone economies will run large fiscal deficits even in 2022. And the European Central Bank and many other advanced-economy central banks remain fully committed to continuing unconventional policies for much longer.

He concludes by pointing to the likelihood of “persistent negative supply shocks”. I would add that the best evidence we have is that public debt overhang is a drag on economic growth. We already have a lot of public debt overhang and the likelihood is we will have more.

Update

Also at Project Syndicate Kenneth RogofF waxes nostalgic about the similarities between the present and the 1970s: the messy and unsuccessful conclusion of a disastrous war, a Republican president challenging institutional norms, slowing economic innovation, flagging growth in productivity, and big increases in government spending unmatched by tax increases. Ah, those were the days.

5 comments… add one
  • Drew Link

    “For example, in the US, core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices,….”

    Sigh. Food and energy may be volatile in the short term, but the cold hard fact is that stripping it out does a disservice:

    1. With all the caveats about how they vary per person, they total a quarter of all consumption expenditures (more, of course, for lower incomes)

    2. For the past 20 years I could find, on a yearly basis they both rarely go down. Its actually a steady increase when smoothed.

    The truth is that inflation is roaring. I commented awhile ago that a guy put together a basket from 20 and 10 years ago, and compared to today. (Actually earlier this year) The result indicated 10%+ price escalation.

    Maybe its the MMT’rs who want to obfuscate. But just a basic sense of what is going on around you tells you – inflation is roaring.

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    On economic news; the most alarming chart is the one from Atlanta Fed (GDP nowcast)

    https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow

    Best estimates went from 7% to 3.5% over 1.5 months.

  • I wish they were a bit more explicit about the reasons for the change in their nowcast. I get the impression it’s because of slower than expected employment growth/unemployment decrease but it would be nice to know for sure.

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    The Atlanta Fed has the reasons. From the webpage

    “After this morning’s releases from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the U.S. Census Bureau, the nowcasts of third-quarter real personal consumption expenditures growth and third-quarter real gross private domestic investment growth decreased from 2.6 percent and 23.4 percent, respectively, to 1.9 percent and 19.3 percent, respectively, while the nowcast of the contribution of the change in real net exports to third-quarter real GDP growth decreased from -0.90 percentage points to -1.41 percentage points.”

    Those 3 factors caused the GDP growth estimate to decline from 5.2 to 3.7.

    So
    a) Consumer spending growth is declining.
    b) Business investment growth is declining.
    c) Export growth is declining.

    Now why all 3 categories the growth is declining is the fun part. It could be

    a) The latest covid wave is restricting economic activity
    b) Stimulus from direct cash handouts is worn off
    c) Inflation is biting both businesses and consumers
    d) Supply chains issues are really restricting production (and consumer spending, one can’t spend when they can’t buy)

  • a) Consumer spending growth is declining.
    b) Business investment growth is declining.
    c) Export growth is declining.

    Note that the spending bills making their way through the Congress will only deal with a). When you add the info from the St. Louis Fed:


    it suggests that consumer spending isn’t the biggest component of those declines. See that little, tiny dogleg at the end of the series? That’s the decline. It’s still increasing it’s just not increasing as fast as it was. Exports and business investment are actually declining. Shorter: the “stimulus packages” won’t stimulate anything. What is needed in the near term is to increase business investment. Threatening to raise taxes probably won’t have that effect.

    Just as a passing observation inflation probably won’t reduce nominal consumer spending but it may reduce real consumer consumer spending.

    One more point: I find the governmental responses to COVID-19 around here completely baffling. They’re running around with their hair on fire but, at least if you consider the statistics available publicly, the pandemic is materially over here.

Leave a Comment