G. K. Chesterton on democracy

I was leafing throught G. K. Chesterton’s Orthodoxy for the first time in many years and the following words jumped out at me:

“This is the first principle of democracy: that the essential things in men are the things they hold in common, not the things they hold separately. And the second principle is merely this: that the political instinct or desire is on of those things which they hold in common. Falling in love is more poetical than dropping into poetry. The democratic contention is that government (helping to rule the tribe) is a thing like falling in love, and not a thing like dropping into poetry. It is not something analogous to playing the church organ, painting on vellum, discovering the North Pole (that insidious habit), looping the loop, being Astronomer Royal, and so on. For these things we do not wish a man to do at all unless he does them well. It is, on the contrary, a thing analogous to writing one’s own love-letters or blowing one’s own nose. These things we want a man to do for himself, even if he does them badly. I am not here arguing the truth of any of these conceptions; I know that some moderns are asking to have their wives chosen by scientists, and they may soon be asking, for all I know, to have their noses blown by nurses. I merely say that mankind does recognize these universal human functions, and that democracy classes government among them. In short, the democratic faith is this: that the most terribly important things must be left to ordinary men themselves–the mating of the sexes, the rearing of the young, the laws of the state. This is democracy; and in this I have always believed.”

Perhaps that’s something to contemplate as we debate whether Iraq’s ready for democracy.

0 comments

Presidential press conference

I hadn’t planned on commenting on the press conference last night since nearly everything that could be said has already been said be people more skilled than I. Check out Glenn Reynold’s rundown.

President Bush’s performance at last night’s press conference was adequate but lackluster. That he has had only twelve of them since becoming president doesn’t surprise me. I suspect that it’s something like my wife’s explanation for why she doesn’t want to go dancing: “I don’t engage in failure-oriented activities.”

What did impress me was the palpable disdain the press had for the President and the clear sense that they were gunning for a useable sound-bite. As my auld mither said “You’d think they’d have respect for the cloth, if not the man.”

I guess this is what you can expect in a post-Watergate world in which every kid in J-school dreams of being another Woodward or Bernstein and building a career on bringing down a president. I think this explains the tenacity of the press in going after Bill Clinton after initial resistance to the Monica-gate story. And the “have you stopped beating your wife”-type questions the press perseverated on last night.

0 comments

9/11 Commission’s Perry Mason moment

When Attorney General John Ashcroft produced the 1995 memo written by then Janet Reno deputy and present 9/11 Commissioner Jamie Gorelik, it was a legitimate Perry Mason moment. The memo simultaneously refuted much of Janet Reno’s testimony that “The Wall” of separation between intelligence and law enforcement either did not exist or, to the extent that it did exist, was not much of a handicap and brought into sharp relief Jamie Gorelik’s conflict of interests.

Commissioner Gorelik only presence at the hearings should be as a witness not as a commissioner. For the findings of the commission to have any legitimacy there will need to be at least a semblance of non-partisanship. How they get there from here is certainly not clear to me.

If I weren’t so fed up with the whole proceedings, it would have been entertaining.

2 comments

Response to a comment in yesterday’s post

I try to respond to as many of the comments and as much of the email that I receive as I can. Here’s my response to one of the comments on yesterday’s post, Media watch: Iraq.

Dear Kingelvis:

Thank you for your comment on The Glittering Eye.

“Given the corporate media’s complete surrender of objectivity during its fevered drum beating for the Iraq war…”

I certainly don’t recall such a drum beat. Could you please provide citations from, in particular, the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, CBS, or NBC? I’m sincerely interested.

“it is simply laughable now to call the corporate media “liberal.” “

Although I’ve seen them characterized that way quite a bit, if you examine my post you won’t see me saying that. Why the quotation marks?

“The profit motive would incent them to push the war…”

Yes, you’d think that wouldn’t you? I think if you examine Pinch Sulzberger’s record the profit motive isn’t that high on his list.

“The writer presumes that “keeping secret” an alleged Iranian connection to Sadr is somehow hurting the right wing cause…”

First, I am absolutely not right wing nor do I support right wing causes. I am a moderate. I am politically centrist by virtually every measure. Since I didn’t claim that Big Media was, as you say, “keeping secret”, may I assume that these are either scare quotes or used for emphasis? Moqtada al Sadr’s connection to Iran has been confirmed by multiple independent sources. It cannot be characterized as an allegation. Without refutation it must be considered a fact. I would sincerely appreciate citations disproving this.

I’m indifferent to whether Big Media covering or failing to cover what is obviously an important story helps or hinders the “right wing cause” you refer to. An impartial press is a human impossibility–every human being has his or her own agenda and that agenda will inevitably be reflected in his or her writing. But a balanced press is not only a possibility, I believe it’s a necessity to maintain a free and democratic society.

“when the impossibility of the Iraq occupation…”

That remains to be seen. I’ve never been a staunch advocate of the invasion of Iraq–I’ve always been a skeptic. But we’re there now and really need to do our best to accomplish whatever objective we’re trying to achieve.

“tenuous hold on power by the US puppet regime in Afghanistan…”

Although I was a skeptic on Afghanistan as well on prudential grounds, it’s not hard to make the argument in favor of invading Afghanistan. We had world-wide–although not unanimous–support for this invasion. For both logistical and political reasons we went in with a small-footprint force. I believe that what’s going on there right now is what can reasonably be expected under the circumstances.

“the US simply doesn’t have the resources to invade and occupy yet one more nation…

This is an argument I’ve made myself. It doesn’t invalidate the fact that Iran’s support for insurgency in Iraq is a problem.

“…portrayal of Sadr as a mere “thug” …”

Not my portrayal. Scare quotes again?

“…neo-con fantasy of infinite American dominion over the earth…”

This is an extremely serious charge. Do you have proof of this? Military superiority is not ipso facto dominion.

Once again, thanks for your comment.

Dave Schuler
The Glittering Eye

Relevant to this whole subject there’s a really important discussion on the war in Iraq and the War on Terror going on over at Winds of Change. Be sure to read the comments.

2 comments

Now here’s an interesting project

I just received a request for a quote on the following web application:

The current site is (web-site URL appropriate for an escort service) it is a directory of adult entertainers worldwide – over 100 cities and 37 countries.

The redesign will require a database .php for the automation of the entire site to include models posting bio, stats, contact and photos and their ability to modify, add or delete their profile. Additional countries / cities will need to be added as needed so the site needs to be flexible.

It’s amazing what they’re doing with technology these days.

0 comments

Media watch: Iraq

Fox News (TV only–I couldn’t find anything on their web site) has picked up the story, reported by the NY Post yesterday, documented by MEMRI, and widely discussed throughout the blogosphere that Moqtada al Sadr is receiving substantial material support from Iran. The New York Times, Washington Post, NBC, ABC, and CBS apparently don’t consider this news.

In an interview on Fox News this morning Major General Raymond Odierno commander of the 4th Infantry Division, struggling to be as diplomatic as possible, characterized the coverage of Iraq by the media as “exaggerated”. “When we were in Tikrit when a single mortar round was fired, it was reported as an artillery barrage”, General Odierno went on to say.
[continue reading…]

11 comments

Dribbling

This was so funny I had to pass it along.

Yesterday my wife brought home an “indestructable” dog toy–a ball– from an agility competition. I’ll write up my impressions of these toys some other time. Suffice it to say that this toy has lasted about 24 hours longer than I expected it to.

Qila has discovered the new ball. At first he had some difficulty in picking it up–it’s larger than the tennis balls and similarly-sized balls he’s used to. And it has a “squishy” feel that I suspect is pleasant to his gums and teeth.

Now he’s taken the ball outside and has discovered that the ball has an interesting bounce. He’s dribbling the ball around the yard–letting it drop, bounce back up to him, and catching it again.

0 comments

Easter bells

Christos aneste.

Today is Easter Sunday. And, as happens once every three or four years, it is Greek Orthodox Easter as well. Christos aneste (Christ is risen) is a traditional Orthodox Easter greeting. The proper response is Alethos aneste. Risen indeed.

There’s a Greek folk tale that on Good Friday every year all of the demons and devils and evil spirits come out to gnaw away at the Tree of Life. They have until the bells ring on Easter morning to do their evil work. You can really hear this story.

Clickety-clack the hooves.
Gnash-gnash the teeth.
Creak-creak the Tree.
Ring-ring the bells.

I was born on Christmas. There’s another Greek folk tale that children born on Christmas are actually not human children at all but changeling evil spirits called kallikanzaroi. So, if the old stories are true, I may be one of these evil beasties.

So every year I have a choice. Do I join my demonic brethren and gnaw away at the Tree of Life?

Clickety-clack the hooves.
Gnash-gnash the teeth.
Creak-creak the Tree.
Ring-ring the bells.

I know what I hope. I hope that on Easter morning when the bells sing out their “Christos aneste!” that I, too, shall be able to cry out “Alethos aneste!”.

Risen indeed.

Happy Easter!

4 comments

Reality show must improve to attract audience

“The 9/11 Commission” has yet to find its footing in the crowded reality show lineup and a lack of attention to the conventions of the genre may be one of the reasons. In fact, the program at times seems to resemble professional wrestling more closely. If that’s what the producers are going for, the performers are going to have to buff up quite a bit. Perhaps a guest appearance by the present governor of California or the former governor of Minnesota would help.
[continue reading…]

1 comment

Quiet time in the dog pack

Starting a little after 10:00am until around 3:00pm is quiet time in the dog pack. Everyone sleeps.

Human beings are diurnal. We feel most energetic during the day. Cats are nocturnal. They are most active at night. Dogs along with deer and rabbits are crepuscular (from Latin creper, dark). They are most active at dawn and dusk.
[continue reading…]

0 comments