Not the Worst

I disagree with with Myron Magnet’s assertion in City Journal that Barack Obama is the worst president in American history:

But unlike Lincoln, America’s first black president didn’t bind up the nation’s wounds but scratched them open every time police killed a black man—rightly or sometimes wrongly, because when society arms men with guns and authority, it will inevitably attract some bullies, making a police chief responsible for policing his own men vigilantly, as the NYPD especially has striven to do, and as Plato told us was statecraft’s thorniest problem. Anytime a non-black man killed an African-American, Obama cried racism and said it could have been him or his son, if he’d had one. Every time a cop, white or black, killed a black American, Obama’s reflexive instinct was to blame the cop. About the mayhem of black-on-black murder in the nation’s ghettoes, he gave only a single speech.

When the president praises the Black Lives Matter demonstrators, as if they alone of his fellow countrymen know that platitudinous truth, he is only reinforcing black grievance, when his proper role is to convince ghetto blacks that their lives matter enough for them to take responsibility for them, to stop going around with chips on their shoulders and Glocks in their waistbands, to be fathers to the children they beget, and to set for them an example of the responsible citizenship that is theirs for the asking, thanks to the efforts of so many of their countrymen, white and black, living and dead.

I’m willing to cut the president more slack than that. I think that President Obama has a very bad habit of musing in public, something that’s acceptable in a college professor but problematic for a president of the United States. He intervenes in local matters that don’t really concern him and, sadly, frequently speaks before engaging his intellect. Instinctively, he reacts in such a way as to consolidate his political base, even at the expense of greater, more laudable goals.

But there’s just too much competition for the title of “worst president”. William Henry Harrison, Warren G. Harding, Andrew Johnson, and, notably, George W. Bush are frequently mentioned as contenders. I think that President Obama’s record pales in comparison with the turpidity of Harding or the damage of Andrew Johnson. As to George W. Bush, I think it’s too early to tell. He could be a contender.

4 comments… add one
  • Gustopher Link

    “Anytime a non-black man killed an African-American, Obama cried racism and said it could have been him or his son, if he’d had one. Every time a cop, white or black, killed a black American, Obama’s reflexive instinct was to blame the cop.”

    Obama must be tired and hoarse by now.

    I think there are people who wish the problem of racism would just go away, back to wherever it was when it wasn’t dominating the news cycle.

    Obama is the Divider In Chief because he doesn’t ignore it when blacks get killed in what appear to be racist and unjust circumstances. He hasn’t actually responded to anything that wasn’t already dominating the news, but he is the clearly the problem to some people.

  • steve Link

    BS article. Not once did he blame the cops. He goes out of his way each time to say cops have a tough job and they are wonderful. The problem is that thanks to cellphones with video capability and social media we have discovered that white-black relations weren’t so wonderful after all.

    Bus presided over the worst economic crash since the Great Depression. He got us, electively, into the Iraq War, the consequences of which will last for many more years. What single thing has Obama done that could match either of those? However it is at least honest to hear a guy like this state that if a black man has a chip on his shoulder that is sufficient cause for execution. Like the guy in South Carolina. Stopped for a seat belt infraction. Did not have a gun. Followed instructions. Got shot. (OK, no real attitude shown with this guy, but he was a minority.)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXmVPxQGTsE

    Steve

  • PD Shaw Link

    Roland Fryer study:

    On non-lethal uses of force, there are racial differences – sometimes quite large – in police use of force, even after accounting for a large set of controls designed to account for important contextual and behavioral factors at the time of the police-civilian interaction. Interestingly, as use of force increases from putting hands on a civilian to striking them with a baton, the overall probability of such an incident occurring decreases dramatically but the racial difference remains roughly constant. Even when officers report civilians have been compliant and no arrest was made, blacks are 21.3 (0.04) percent more likely to endure some form of force. Yet, on the most extreme use of force – officer-involved shootings – we are unable to detect any racial differences in either the raw data or when accounting for controls.”

    An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force (pdf)

    Based upon this analysis, doesn’t it stand to reason that small encounters btw/ police and the public are not significantly responsible for police shootings? We’ve had some examples of escalation incidents, but they may not be normal, which may be the reason for the public scrutiny.

  • Andy Link

    I always roll my eyes when someone tries to argue that this, or any sitting President is the “worst ever.” It’s just dumb.

Leave a Comment