These with a thousand small deliberations
Protract the profit of their chilled delirium,
Excite the membrane, when the sense has cooled,
With pungent sauces, multiply variety
In a wilderness of mirrors. What will the spider do
Suspend its operations, will the weevil
Delay?
T. S. Eliot, Gerontion
The trap that is a perpetual temptation to those who have made intelligence their careers has aptly been called the “wilderness of mirrors”. Lies, truth, good, bad are tangled and twisted beyond recognition. What to make of the remarks of former intelligence chief James Clapper? In his Wall Street Journal column Holman Jenkins remarks:
His latest assertion, in a book and interviews, that Mr. Putin elected Mr. Trump is based on non-reasoning that effectively puts defenders of U.S. democracy in a position of having to prove a negative. “It just exceeds logic and credulity that they didn’t affect the election,†he told PBS.
Mr. Clapper not only exaggerates Russia’s efforts, he crucially overlooks the fact that it’s the net effect that matters. Allegations and insinuations of Russian meddling clearly cost Mr. Trump some sizeable number of votes. Hillary Clinton made good use of this mallet, as would be clearer now if she had also made good use of her other assets to contest those states where the election would actually be decided.
Mr. Clapper misleads you (and possibly himself) by appealing to the hindsight fallacy: Because Mr. Trump’s victory was unexpected, Russia must have caused it. But why does he want you to believe that he believes what he can’t possibly know?
There’s been much talk about origins. Let’s understand how all this really began. James Comey knew it was unrealistic that Mrs. Clinton would be prosecuted for email mishandling but also knew it was the Obama Justice Department’s decision to make, own and defend. Why did he insert himself?
The first answer is that he expected Mrs. Clinton to win—and likely believed it was necessary that she win. Secondly he had a pretext for violating the normal and proper protocol for criminal investigations. He did so by turning it into a counterintelligence matter, seizing on a Democratic email supposedly in Russian hands that dubiously referred to a compromising conversation of Attorney General Loretta Lynch regarding the Hillary investigation.
My take: Mr. Clapper cannot be trusted. Nothing he says or does should be taken at face value. He doesn’t distinguish among lies, truth, facts, or opinion. He demonstrably does not recognize the limits of his own power or authority.
I have grave reservations about the allowable roles of an intelligence service in a free society, particularly one as foundationless as ours. We aren’t the Israelis.
As a former intel guy, I loathe Clapper and I think he’s an insult to our profession.
I don’t think he’s a good guy let alone a hero. I think he’s acting as a political operative and intertwining national intelligence, government service, and politics in a way that is profoundly damaging and casts the entire apparatus into question. I would not be sad if he were thrown into jail, presumably for perjury, and forgotten about.