James Marriott on “Post-Literacy”

I wanted to point out that in the most recent post on his Substack James Marriott covers a lot of the same territory I have over the years here on the cognitive, social, and political implications of the abandoning of reading. I’ve categorized it as “Visualcy”. He refers to it as “post-literacy”. He cites many of the same sources I have for the last 25 years on the subject. Highly recommended.

If you don’t like the vapid, agonistic, and all-too-frequently pointless character of our present politics, a lot of what we’re seeing can be explained by the cognitive and behavioral impact of not reading.

3 comments… add one
  • Andy Link

    I think you’ve been way ahead of the curve on this.

    And I think a lot of the “reading” that’s taking place is on social media, which just adds to the problem.

  • I started writing about this before smartphones were “a thing”.

    One factor may be because I’m what’s called an “early adopter” as was my father before me. I’ve had a computer in my home for 50 years. I’ve had a home network for 35 years, a wireless home network with Internet connectivity for 30 years.

  • Zachriel Link

    Opinions vary. Socrates on the written word:

    Writing is inferior to speech. For it is like a picture, which can give no answer to a question, and has only a deceitful likeness of a living creature. It has no power of adaptation, but uses the same words for all.

    No intelligent man will ever be so bold as to put into writing the thoughts which his mind has conceived, and this is especially true of the deepest and most serious thoughts.

    You would imagine that [written words] had intelligence, but if you want to know anything and put a question to them, they always say one and the same thing.

    Of course, we don’t know this about Socrates from Socrates—because he didn’t write it down! Fortunately, his student, Plato, did happen to write it down. Those young whippersnappers and their ink!

Leave a Comment