In an op-ed in the Washington Post Australian journalist Richard Glover presents ten reasons why Australia’s campaign against COVID-19 has fared reasonably well. Here they are:
- The bush fire experience
- First Nations people must be given power to run their own response
- States matter
- It helps if people follow the rules
- It’s important to reach across the aisle
- You don’t have to choose between “saving lives†and “saving the economyâ€
- People trust the health system
- Make use of the police and military
- Mobilize communities
- Be an island
He touches on critical differences between Australia and the United States but refrains from pointing them out explicitly. I don’t know whether that’s from discretion, ignorance, or he simply takes Australia’s circumstances for granted. I’ll point some of them out much more explicitly:
- Don’t have a long land border.
- Be small. Australia’s population is more than an order of magnitude smaller than ours. That doesn’t just mean that the problem facing them is one-tenth as complex as the problem that faces the U. S. It means that the problem they face is 1/1000th as complicated as the problem we face.
- Have higher social cohesion. Australia is much more linguistically, culturally, religiously, ethnically, racially, and economically more homogeneous than the U. S. These things matter.
- Have a government that’s worthy of trust.
- Give partisan and political advantage a lower priority. When those are the highest priorities everything else takes a backseat.
All things considered when you take into account the enormous handicaps under which we’ve labored, we’re not doing too bad.
As much as we may need to rebuild our material infrastructure, there is an astronomically greater need to rebuild our societal infrastructure which we’ve been tearing down faster than it can be rebuilt over the period of the last 50 years.
Lets add good leadership to the list. We didnt have that at all. Among the worst in the world.
I am unaware that any significant amount of Covid came across the southern border so not really sure what a long border means here. Canada had much less than we did.
Steve
It doesn’t take a significant number, steve. As long as the R of COVID-19 is greater than 1, it just takes 1 person with COVID-19.
And I agree with your point about good leadership.
If we only had one come across then our problem is really the millions of other cases. The ROI on trying to stop that one is not nearly as good as trying to stop the many cases here in the US. This is essentially a zero tolerance policy who is almost always bad. If you really want to stop Covid coming into the US from Mexico why dont we prohibit US senators, among others, and their families from flying to Mexico?
Steve