Chicago is closing in on 800 homicides for 2016. Year-to-date 771 have been murdered in the city of Chicago. The editors of the Chicago Tribune declaim:
This is where we’d like to write a fat passage about how seriously Chicago’s elected officials take the carnage on their watch, about all they’re doing in their respective fiefs to respond.
Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson certainly takes the carnage seriously. He speaks often about people who wind up on the business end of a bullet. He speaks, too, about the crime-ravaged neighborhoods where law-abiding citizens wonder who’ll be the next youngster to fall — neighborhoods that many residents have fled, often to Chicago’s suburbs.
Most Chicago legislators and aldermen, though, are in hiding. They know what’s happening in their districts or wards, yet take no ownership — except to complain that they want more cops in their neighborhoods. Don’t we all.
A few politicians, including state Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago, are on the case. Raoul, with encouragement from Johnson, has pledged to introduce legislation that would lengthen sentences for repeat gun offenders. We’ve long supported that, proposing that for every casket of an innocent who is buried, a casket should be transported to the steps of the Illinois Capitol and neatly stacked in a pyramid until lawmakers act.
But we also remember what happened the last time a proposal comparable to Raoul’s briefly had traction. That was in autumn 2013 — a bill backed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel and then-Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez. The bill failed because African-American lawmakers were concerned that increased incarceration would hurt their communities. Speaker Michael Madigan adjourned the House to avoid a potentially fiery debate pitting black and Latino lawmakers against mostly white Chicago-area and Downstate lawmakers. That would have exposed philosophical fissures among Madigan’s Democrats.
In a companion commentary piece the Tribune is publishing today, Raoul and three other Chicago-area lawmakers explain the legislation they’ll push in 2017. We hope the General Assembly will follow through this time.
And the feckless aldermen? We’ve written of their assets — their local prominence, their bully pulpits, their resources that should be focused on building stronger anti-crime efforts in their respective wards. The aldermen are uniquely positioned to help rebuild trust between civilians and police officers. We’ve urged aldermen to step forward instead of pointing fingers anywhere but at themselves. And we draw their wrath when we ask them three questions:
Have you insisted that parents in your ward search their dwellings for guns? Have you organized your constituents, block by block, to occupy hot intersections? Have you demanded that your constituents cooperate with law enforcement to help stop the bloodshed?
There’s a reason you haven’t read about Chicago aldermen crusading on this brief agenda in their wards. It’s easier for them to curse the violence than to risk alienating some voters by calling more attention to it.
The evidence that greater police presence as such will reduce the number of violent crimes is weak at best. It’s more dependent on the nature of that presence and the relationship between the police officers and the community and, frankly, in the neighborhoods where most of the murders are taking place that relationship is very bad. Police corruption over a period of decades will have that effect.
An unseasonably cold December is probably the only thing shielding Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel from the number of homicides hitting 800 this year. The homicide rate per 100,000 population is already at historic highs.
A question, is the number of attempted shootings / overall violence per capita actually AT an all time high? Medical technology on treating gun wounds has advanced since the 80’s so in theory it takes more shootings to generate the same number of homicides.
Tragically, out where I live, more people know about the Chicago Cubs then this story. Its one of those cases as you point out, where the media shapes the “narrative” more by not covering a story then reporting/misreporting the facts. My suspicion is that it wasn’t in a media hub like DC, NY, LA, or SF, and the media realized there was no way to spin this for Democrats and the current administration. Perhaps with a new administration in town, there will be more willingness to cover this. Attention is probably the first step in figuring out solutions.
That’s a point that was made by Chicago columnist John Kass a couple of weeks ago. Yes. Relative to population shootings are at an all-time high. Medical technology reduces the number of those shootings that are homicides.
There isn’t actually much ambiguity about the source of the problem. It’s street gangs. The overwhelming preponderance of homicides are in just a few neighborhoods. There needs to be a crackdown. Unfortunately (and tying in with my observations about political corruption), the politicians are in bed with the gangs.
The usual solutions proposed, e.g. reducing the number of guns on the streets, increasing the number of police officers, are only peripherally related to the problem. Directly related to the problem: slow economic growth, not enough jobs.