Good Intentions Are Not Enough

The editors of the Wall Street Journal remark on the hard time that President Biden’s vaccine mandates are encountering in the courts:

What legal sage advised President Biden to impose vaccine mandates? The adviser needs to have his law licence pulled because the courts are repudiating the Administration’s mandates at an astonishing pace. A federal judge in Georgia was the latest on Tuesday when he blocked its vaccine requirement for employees of federal contractors—the fifth judicial rebuke in less than a month.

Judge R. Stan Baker ruled in a challenge brought by seven states that the Administration had exceeded its authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act. The President claimed his executive order would “promote economy and efficiency in procurement” by contracting with sources “that provide adequate Covid-19 safeguards for their workforce.”

But the law does not give the President “the right to impose virtually any kind of requirement on businesses that wish to contract with the Government (and, thereby, on those businesses’ employees) so long as he determines it could lead to a healthier and thus more efficient workforce or it could reduce absenteeism,” Judge Baker wrote.

Last week federal Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove enjoined the Administration from enforcing the contractor mandate in Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee. While conceding that Congress delegated broad power to the President, the judge noted that his “authority is not absolute” and the President’s overreach raises “several concerning statutory and constitutional implications.” The mandate “intrudes on an area that is traditionally reserved to the States,” Judge Tatenhove wrote, noting the Constitution grants the states general police powers to regulate public health and welfare.

which you may notice closely follows what I have been saying.

Good intentions are not enough. You must also be doing the right things in the right way. Anything else is a waste of time. I like to believe that the Administration thinks that its good intentions are enough but they increasingly seem to be showing that they are less interested in actually accomplishing things than in being seen to be trying to accomplish things.

As I’ve also said before I believe the executive branch should be using its constitutional powers as well as encouraging the legislative branch and the states to use theirs. I have no doubt that the states have the authority to impose vaccine mandates and I am equally certain that the federal government has the authority to regulate commerce and transportation between the states, particularly on federal highways.

I recognize that some will view this as pure partisan politics but I think it’s more than that. It’s an issue of separation of powers and legal authority. Presidents are not absolute monarchs. It doesn’t matter to which party they belong.

5 comments… add one
  • TastyBits Link

    It moved beyond good (or bad) intentions, long ago. It is about power and dominance. Basically, half the country wants to be submissive sheep, and they hate the other half that want to be free sheep.

    I am a little more concerned about murder and drunk driving.

  • I keep going back to Hanlon’s Razor (“never attribute to malice anything that can be explained by incompetence”). Also add the Politician’s Syllogism:

    1. We must do something.
    2. X is something.
    3. Do X

  • TastyBits Link

    I agree that the Biden Administration is trying to right their sinking ship, but they are fueling the COVID hysteria they want to stop. Either the crisis is over, or it is not.

    If this is still worse than the black plague, the economy should be shut down and stay shut down until the crisis is over. This is politically untenable, and economically, it is far worse than COVID.

    COVID hysteria is like CO2 hysteria. People need to have faith in things they cannot comprehend. It is an evolutionary mechanism in humans to allay their fear of the unknown.

    This is not about an inept pathogen. It is about the faithless trying to make sense of a world they cannot understand. “The Science” is the metaphysical basis, and “Reverend Fauci” is one of the priests interpreting “The Science”. Those who disagree are heretics or heathens, and must be dealt with as they have been, historically.

    This about power, and it will never end.

  • PD Shaw Link

    I too dislike the bad intentions directed at lawyers that ‘should have their license pulled.’ There has not been a successful OSHA emergency rule that has passed in my lifetime. This was always going to be hard. I think the last attempt was blocked by the courts in the early 70s. It generally takes the government more than four years to promulgate an OSHA rule. See this pdf flowchart:

    https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/OSHA_FlowChart.pdf

    I think I would have targeted the emergency rule to the easiest and most important targets. They are unlikely to have developed a record internally within the time frame they proposed the rule. They are in a Catch-22, if it was an emergency, why did it take so long? OTOH, why didn’t you consider this or that or the other? I particularly would have targeted states with anti-vaccine mandates under the commerce clause and supremacy clause. Let businesses decide.

  • They are in a Catch-22, if it was an emergency, why did it take so long?

    Very much my point.

Leave a Comment