For the want of a nail the shoe was lost,
For the want of a shoe the horse was lost,
For the want of a horse the rider was lost,
For the want of a rider the battle was lost,
For the want of a battle the kingdom was lost,
And all for the want of a horseshoe-nail.
I agree with the point that Joe Nocera makes in his piece at Bloomberg. Donald Trump has been remiss in not increasing the availability of Personal Protective Agreement (PPE) enough:
Hospitals now routinely reuse masks that are supposed to be discarded after one use. Nitrile gloves, which are primarily made in Malaysia, Vietnam and Thailand, have become almost impossible to get. (It didn’t help that Malaysia, where 75% of the gloves are manufactured, was in lockdown recently.) By early next year, needles are going to be scarce, according to supply-chain experts I’ve spoken to.
And that was before the recent spike in Covid-19 cases and hospitalizations. When I asked Marc Schessel what was in short supply now that daily positive cases in the U.S. were regularly topping 100,000, he replied, “Masks, gowns, all of it. It’s going to be a real [expletive] very soon — much worse than Round One.â€
Schessel should know. He is the founder and chief executive officer of SCWorx Corp., a company that provides supply-chain management software for the hospital industry. When it first became clear that the PPE supply chain was breaking down, hundreds of hospitals asked him to see if he could source protective equipment. He turned over much of his day-to-day duties at his company to other executives to focus on finding PPE.
Over the last nine months, Schessel has seen it all. Early on, he saw hospitals lose millions of dollars by naively making “down payments†for PPE that was being dangled by fraudsters. He watched deals for millions of masks — deals he thought he had locked down — vanish at the last minute. Warehouses that were supposed to be filled with N95 masks turned out to be empty. He’s seen hedge funds flip shipments of PPE as if they were oil futures, driving up the price as they bought and sold. Sometimes, legitimate PPE orders from abroad got delayed by Food and Drug Administration problems. Most of the PPE he could get his hands on cost three, four or five times their pre-pandemic price. And on and on.
and correcting that problem should be a high priority for the incoming Biden Administration. He proposes
- Using the Defense Production Act to “take over” PPE sourcing and distribution
- Getting FEMA to “create new supply chains”
- Getting the Defense Logistics Agency to distribute PPE
- Forbid trading by hedge funds (?)
- Again using the DPA command companies to start manufacturing PPE
Ignoring the legal problems with his plan which are formidable, I think he’s drastically underestimating the scope of the problem. Supply chains work like that little verse at the top of this post and you can’t just wave them into existence. Each step must be present.
Although the U. S. still produces a lot of the world’s cotton, just to pick one example, step by step we have been getting out of the cotton processing business for decades. We no longer have the gins or spinners or looms for making yarn or cloth. Most of the clothing manufacturers have left, too. We no longer make the gins or spinners or looms or sewing machines. We don’t mine the metal or produce the other materials for making them. We don’t have the people with the diverse skills.
That can all be remedied but don’t underestimate the vast amount of industrial subsidies, time, and attention that will be required. What we have learned over the last eight months is that we can’t afford to specialize as much as we have been and, in particular, we can’t specialize in consumption.
What we have learned is that we should have started working on this 8 months ago.
Steve
No argument here but you still don’t appreciate the scope of the problem. Don’t think months. Think starting when Obama was inaugurated or before. If you want supply chains that aren’t vulnerable to interruptions in China, India, Malaysia, or Phlippines, it will take subsidies and industrial policies beyond anything that anybody has proposed. And won’t receive support from either progressives or conservatives. We’ve been de-industrializing for 50 years. Re-industrializing won’t take that long but it will take years. And it will take both subsidies and a lot more energy production.
Dave- There was a company down in Texas that thought they had everything lined up to produce a lot more PPE. However, they wanted a government guarantee that they would buy products for, IIRC, at least two years. Their concern was that they would build a facility and then not be able to recoup costs if the pandemic was resolved within a year. So yes, to fix all of the supply chain issues would take years. For individual products and product lines it looks like it can be done a lot faster, with financial support as needed, even the subsidies you mention.
Steve
Little bit OT, but if you are interested Laszewski has a decent, short assessment of likely Biden health care policy. I dont really see the Senate letting any of it pass, but who knows. He has written quite a bit on Medicare being allowed to bid on drug prices. Do you know why Republicans oppose this so much? There are bids on lots of stuff govt buys. In Saudi during Desert Storm when something failed we always joked about all of our gear being the lowest bid stuff.
Steve
There seem to be an ample supply of KN-95 masks which are supposedly basically the same except the KN has Chinese certification and the N has NIOSH certification. Yeah, I have no faith in the Chinese certification, and I’m sure I’m missing complicating factors, but why couldn’t we have labs test the KN-95 masks to NIOSH standards? Assuming some passed, that would at least let us buy from China temporarily while we unfuck that particular supply chain over the long term.
Good question. Why not as a short term solution? In the long term I think we’d want to apply a Pigouvian tax to the Chinese masks to cover the inspection and testing costs.
If I were Biden I’d put this in the lap of Andrew Yang.
Energetic techno numbers cruncher without an overburden of ego.
Did people even read Dave’s post?
We should have started it 18 years ago, not 8 mos ago. If you want to crassly make it political, blame the globalists.
But if you want solutions, instead of recriminations……
What’s done is done. The key is to disregard the globalists, not return to their prescriptions. Yet I see calls just this morning for America Second; send the vaccine overseas.
It is just incredible.
Not from me.
I have no interest in recruiting foreign nations as American grievance groups.
My understanding is since the spring; the CDC, FDA, NIPSH issued regulatory exceptions such that KN95 can be used in place of N95.
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/personal-protective-equipment-euas#respirators
That’s probably why you don’t see an industry of certifying KN-95 with NIOSH to get an N-95.
The reason we dont use KN 95s in place of N 95s is that they dont seal as well. (BTW, a lot of them are Korean.) The actual material used in most of them is pretty good. I have a couple that I use in low risk situations. They are more comfortable, mostly because they dont seal as well. What we are doing at my network is printing our own plastic masks and using the filter material from KN 95s to provide the filter material. Also anticipating this about 1/3 of my practice has bought their own PAPR. Filters on them are good for months. Everyone bought an extra battery also so we should be good for a year or two. Our masks will look a bit like the one at the link.
https://store.envomask.com/envomask-n95-respirator-kit-p4.aspx
I am actually a bit more worried about gloves and gowns now.
“Did people even read Dave’s post?”
Yes, and pointed out that he was specifically wrong about masks.
Steve
I presume that steve was referring to Prestige Ameritech and that the story he was talking about is this one. Here’s a quote from that piece:
which seems to support the point I was making. In the same story the explanation of why Prestige Ameritech’s claim went unaccepted is here:
The article doesn’t actually disprove anything. Prestige Ameritech is a major player in the market as are 3M, Honeywell, and others. I guess that strings could have been cut to shorten the government procurement process, something I’ve been complaining about for decades. Congress should probably have appropriated the money to take them up on their offer—Trump couldn’t just spend money on anything he wanted, he needed Congress’s authorization. But having the production lines doesn’t mean that you have the materials.