Charap’s Case for Negotiations

I encourage you to read this New Yorker interview of Samuel Charap by Keith Gessen. Sample passage:

Charles Kupchan, a professor of international affairs at Georgetown who served on the National Security Council staff in the Clinton and Obama Administrations, goes further. “Fighting for every last inch of Ukrainian territory,” he told me, is “morally justified. It’s legally justified. But I’m not sure that it makes a lot of strategic sense from Ukraine’s perspective, or from our perspective, or from the perspective of the people in the Global South who are suffering food and energy shortages.” He said that the U.S. Administration needs to let the Ukrainian counter-offensive play out. But at the end of this year, or maybe early in 2024, it will have to talk with Zelensky about negotiations. “I wouldn’t say, ‘You do this or we’re going to turn off the spigot.’ But you sit down and you have a searching conversation about where the war is going and what’s in the best interest of Ukraine, and you see what comes out of that discussion.”

2 comments… add one
  • steve Link

    Interesting that Russia, which has killed and deported millions of Ukrainians and stolen thousands of their children is not thought of as the party that needs to negotiate. Unfortunately that’s probably true as I dont think Russia has the moral compass needed to compromise. It’s all about power and they view themselves as being more powerful than Ukraine, largely true.

    Steve

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    Gabriel Garcia Marquez, “It is easier to start a war than to end it.” — as Russia and Ukraine know and will know.

    It is also easier to get enmeshed in a war then to extricate oneself, as NATO and the US will find out.

Leave a Comment