Black Flight

I want to draw your attention to this dissenting account, by William Voegeli at City Journal of the suburbanization that took place from 1950 through 1980 in the United States. The prevailing wisdom is that it was motivated by white racism, full stop. The account relies heavily on the evolution of South Shore where Michelle Obama grew up.

IMO the suburbanization under discussion was multi-factorial of which white racism was one factor among many including housing costs, jobs, crime, drugs, the riots of the 1960s, and other, larger social changes.

Here’s a telling passage. Now there’s actually “black flight” to compare it with:

Indeed, a further reason to doubt that white flight was simply, or even primarily, due to racial prejudice is that “black flight,” a more recent development, is following the same course. Examining a development “crushing South Shore and other once-stable neighborhoods on the city’s South and West Sides”—namely, the “exodus of middle-class African-American families seeking safe neighborhoods and job opportunities”—a 2017 Tribune article quoted Jennifer and Jason Parks, who once lived on the block where Michelle Robinson grew up. The Parks family’s enough-is-enough moment came in 2014, when a 20-year-old man was fatally shot on their street while walking his younger brother to school. “South Shore ranks sixth among the city’s 77 community areas for incidents where one or more people were killed over the past decade,” the Tribune reported.

The dangers that, 50 years ago, caused the Robinsons’ white neighbors to move away are now causing black families to abandon South Shore. “If I was holding on to Chicago and something happened to one of our babies,” Mrs. Parks said, “it would crush me.” Rotella records that the net decline in South Shore’s black population between 2000 and 2014 was 12,790. (Its total population in 2015 was 51,451.) As of 2017, the Parks family was preparing to move into a new house in northern Indiana. There was nothing anomalous about their decision. Last year, the Chicago Sun-Times reported that “[t]he city’s black population has fallen from a peak of 1.2 million in 1980 to fewer than 800,000 now and is predicted to drop to 665,000 by 2030.”

In 1950 South Shore’s population was 79,000, mostly white, largely Jewish. When that population left South Shore, they were largely replaced by blacks. As middle class blacks flee South Shore for the suburbs, who will replace them? My answer: no one. There will be mile after mile of empty buildings or open fields where modest single-family homes used to be.

6 comments… add one
  • bob sykes Link

    Detroit II

  • Grey Shambler Link

    I’m going to add another factor, equity. The major driver of wealth creation for the middle class is home equity. Realtors preach that to every client that falls into their clutches. Black or White, those who can move, chose upward mobility over random death.
    Quite naturally, those Black suburbanites do not make headlines, so we still live with the television portrayal of A.F.s as Perps or Victims.

  • Drew Link

    Multi-factorial indeed. Throw in Grey’s housing issue, and the grand daddy of them all, schools, and you have it.

    And what a shame. Go back far enough and Hyde Park and areas just south were old money, later giving way and a bit further south in S Chicago and S Shore to solidly middle class, propped up in no small degree by the now shuttered US Steel S Works and related business.

    And todays middle class blacks, or those just seeking to get away from a deteriorating S Shore or uncomfortable proximity to Lawndale or Englewood? They are headed to the south suburban Homewood’s, Flossmoor’s, Lansings and Glenwood’s (where I lived many, many moons ago) of the world. (Look at a map). And why wouldn’t they? What makes them different, other than a label, from any other group of people? General lawlessness and previously mentioned factors are driving this still today, black or white or whatever.

    This little piece written by Rod Liddle is a window into the grotesque and unhelpful mindset of white liberals, and the solutions to real world issues as seen by them:

    “I wonder if British universities will follow Cornell’s innovative approach to ensuring students are protected from wretched viruses? The American institution has received plaudits for its rigorous regime. Students who refuse to have the flu vaccine will be barred from the Cornell libraries and other campus buildings — or, at least, they will if they are white. ‘Students of color’ can decline to receive the vaccine. Why?

    Cornell explains: ‘Students who identify as Black, Indigenous, or as a Person of Color (BIPOC) may have personal concerns about fulfilling the Compact requirements based on historical injustices and current events.’ The university authorities give a little more detail about what those concerns might be: ‘Recent acts of violence against Black people by law enforcement may contribute to feelings of distrust or powerlessness.’ So, white kids must be tested and vaccinated or face being kicked out, while black students are invited to register their preference for exemption, largely on the grounds that George Floyd was killed by a policemen in a state 1,000 miles away.”

    That’ll fix S Shore. For sure……….

  • steve Link

    The Cornell thing is not true. Link goes to analysis and it links to the original piece put out by Cornell. They acknowledge that POC may have misgivings but explain why they should be vaccinated anyway.

    https://misbar.com/en/factcheck/2020/12/11/cornell-didnt-racially-segregated-a-flu-vaccine-mandate

    Steve

  • Drew Link

    It’s absolutely true. Here is the source Cornell document. BIPOC can apply to opt out for non-public health or scientific reasons. White people cannot. Period.

    It’s pure, sanitizing spin to recast this as a matter of choice or suggestion.

    https://health.cornell.edu/services/immunizations-allergy-shots/annual-flu-vaccination

  • steve Link

    Nope. I read that. Where do you think it says POC dont need to be vaccinated? Not seeing it. I have copied below the part that talks about POC vaccinations if you click the link in your reference. It actually encourages POC to be vaccinated.

    “We recognize that, due to longstanding systemic racism and health inequities in this country, individuals from some marginalized communities may have concerns about needing to agree to such requirements. For example, historically, the bodies the of Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) have been mistreated, and used by people in power, sometimes for profit or medical gain. It is understandable that the current Compact requirements may feel suspect or even exploitative to some BIPOC members of the Cornell community. Additionally, recent acts of violence against Black people by law enforcement may contribute to feelings of distrust or powerlessness. We know this history and validate the potential concerns it may raise. At the same time, we know that long-standing social inequalities and health disparities have resulted in COVID-19 disproportionately affecting BIPOC individuals. Higher percentages of individuals from these communities become infected with COVID, and the health outcomes related to infection are often more serious. Away from campus community, BIPOC individuals are not as likely to have access to preventive services or quality health care. The systems, services, and policies being implemented at Cornell seek to address these inequalities as well as the differential impacts. ”

    Steve

Leave a Comment