Are the Fed Governors “Chickenhawks”?

The editors of the Wall Street Journal are disappointed with the Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee:

The median estimate by Fed officials for personal-consumption expenditure inflation, the Fed’s preferred measure, jumped to 5.3% for this year. How could it not given reality? But they estimate that PCE inflation will crash in 2022 to 2.6%, and keep falling after that.

From this comforting scenario flows the FOMC’s modest policy shifts. The Fed will speed up its tapering of bond purchases, finishing in March instead of June. This isn’t monetary tightening—it’s merely a faster reduction of extraordinary monetary ease. The central bank’s balance sheet will keep growing for three more months even as inflation is running at nearly 7%. Amazing.

Mr. Powell made clear that interest-rate increases won’t begin until after its bond taper ends, and then the forecast is for only three quarter-point rate increases in 2022. This means real interest rates, after accounting for inflation, will remain negative throughout next year. This isn’t a hawkish policy, and the happy reaction of the stock market suggests that investors see a reduced threat to asset prices from higher rates.

There were no dissents on the FOMC, as Mr. Powell was eager to underscore. That’s a surprise given the gulf this year between the central bank’s predictions and inflation reality, but then conformity has been a hallmark of the Powell Fed.

Perhaps the FOMC members want to show solidarity as Mr. Powell and Fed governor Lael Brainard face Senate confirmation hearings—Mr. Powell for another four as chairman and Ms. Brainard as vice chair.

Mr. Powell’s strategy seems to be to steer through his confirmation by talking tougher on inflation while doing little about it anytime soon. The Senators can decide if they feel as confident as the Fed chairman does that he has it all under control.

Unless the increases in prices abate soon, we’ll start seeing demands for “cost of living” wage increases which risks inducing a wage/price spiral which could make the present situation self-sustaining. None of the remediations at that point are particularly appealing.

The Biden Administration could be moved to impose wage and price controls as I intimated yesterday or the Fed could raise interest rates quickly and sharply which under present circumstances would be likely to throw the economy into a tailspin.

4 comments… add one
  • TastyBits Link

    This is not a simple problem of “too much money chasing too few goods”. The production of goods was intentionally disrupted, and this cannot be fixed by adjusting Fed rates.

    Alone, the debt to GDP ratio would be alarming, but with the intentional supply chain destruction and continued spending, it will take years to lower it. This is going to rival the Great Depression.

    The stock market, real estate, and financial instruments are all being inflated, and when the money flows stops, the deflation will start.

  • Drew Link

    “This is not a simple problem of “too much money chasing too few goods.”

    As has been pointed out here a number of times. However, apportioning monetary effects, fiscal over-stimulus and supply shock seems a fool’s errand. I think each policy failure is significant and harmful in their own way. In any event the impacts are intractable in the near term and remediation will come with costs. I see no evidence that the Fed or this Administration are in any way shape or form capable of dealing with them.

    Will it result in a Depression-like scenario? I’d like to hear more about that. But 1980-1982 was bad enough.

  • TastyBits Link

    @Drew

    The stock market and real estate are being propped up by the government since 2008, but with President Biden, it has gone into overdrive. There are a lot of traders borrowing on margin, and the financial industry leverages a lot of real estate.

    The 2008 run on the money market funds was staunched with government money. The money market funds provide liquidity for businesses, and without that liquidity, businesses could not operate due to cash-flow issues. (I know that you know this, but others do not.)

    I do not think a government infusion will work this time because it will not restore trust. This will cause well-run businesses to close due to cash-flow issues. As things are going, I expect a lot of businesses to go under whenever this COVID hysteria is over.

    The people in power care about retaining power, and they do not care about the destruction they cause. (Think Chicago or New Orleans.) In addition, there is CO2 hysteria, and I do not see the people in power easing up anytime soon.

  • Drew Link

    “…the financial industry leverages a lot of real estate.”

    Every John Q Public person who takes out a mortgage has just done their own little LBO.

    “The money market funds provide liquidity for businesses, and without that liquidity, businesses could not operate due to cash-flow issues.”

    More importantly, the financial institutions couldn’t swap money. You didn’t know what the balance sheet of your counterparty looked like. That’s what locked up the market.

    Fear breeds compliance. Its what covid has really been about. But I think the pendulum is swinging. Only the steves of the world are buying Biden, Pelosi’s, The Squad’s etc pure bullshit. To quote David Byrne – independents are asking “my god, what have I done?”

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=many+good+days+go+by+talking+heads&docid=608033370619074167&mid=A0F95206941DE8F7ACABA0F95206941DE8F7ACAB&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

Leave a Comment