Here’s another glimmer of reality at the New York Times in the form of an op-ed by Nekima Levy Armstrong:
Those of us who had long fought for a reckoning over police abuse in Minneapolis expected to see a critical examination of the practices, laws, policies, contractual requirements and spending that undergird policing. We expected a well-thought-out, evidence-based, comprehensive plan to remake our police department.
Instead, what we got was progressive posturing of a kind seen throughout the country and a missed opportunity to bring about real change and racial justice.
This was made plain last week when voters rejected a proposal to replace the Minneapolis Police Department with a new Department of Public Safety. While many white progressives embraced the ballot measure as a sign of progress, many Black residents like me raised concerns that the plan lacked specificity and could reduce public safety in the Black community without increasing police accountability. The city’s largest Black neighborhoods voted it down, while support was greater in areas where more white liberals lived.
She goes on to warn about unintended consequences and furnishes some suggestions for reform:
What many Black people are demanding is a system that is effective, cost-efficient, non-militarized and transparent. We want officials to be accountable for who is hired, how they are disciplined and how they treat us. We want police leaders to admit that racism, white supremacy and misogyny are endemic in many police forces and we want them to commit to radically shift police culture.
For that to happen, there must be a re-examination of the purposes, practices, expenditures and almost unfettered power and discretion of the police. To responsibly reduce spending, elected officials must conduct a real cost/benefit analysis of hiring numerous officers to focus on low-level crime, traffic stops (as in the cases of Daunte Wright and Philando Castile), and small quantities of cannabis, to name a few. This would ultimately mean eliminating or reducing low-level traffic stops, repealing criminal laws and ordinances that do not improve public safety, and making a commitment to end the war on drugs.
Police departments must establish an early-warning system to flag problem officers and a robust disciplinary system when officers violate the law and people’s rights. Instead of continuing to allow police departments to investigate themselves when officers kill people, states should establish a special prosecutor’s office to investigate claims and bring charges when appropriate.
but posturing is easier, cheaper, more fun, and has lots less accountability so I think we should expect more of it. To once again cite my favorite example of a bad example, during the Chicago mayoral primary elections, the plurality of black votes went to the most conservative candidate on the ballot—a black Chicago businessman. To me that suggested that black Chicago voters were tired of posturing and business a usual and were much more concerned about “bread and butter issues”. The present incumbent was the preferred candidate of the progressive mostly white Lakeshore voters.
Not surprising I think. Very few people actually wanted to get rid of police. A goodly number of people do want to look at police practices that dont appear to improve the public safety.
Steve
No, it’s not surprising. What’s surprising is how incredibly detached those pushing the “defund the police” slogan are from the actual lives of most people, particularly black people.