Robert J. Samuelson’s latest Washington Post column is a jeremiad against the rising public debt:
What is missing in this campaign, as I have written before and no doubt will write again, is an informative and honest discussion of the role of government in American life. We don’t want to admit that government worth having is worth paying for, through taxes — with the well-known exceptions of recessions and wars, when deficits are often inevitable and Âdesirable.
Let’s concede that higher deficits are one problem that can’t be blamed on President Trump. Since the 1970s and 1980s, Democrats and Republicans alike have evaded the hard questions required to balance the budget.
Should we direct more — or less — aid to those in the bottom half of the income distribution? Have we shortchanged defense? With an elderly population that is richer and healthier than its predecessors, should we raise eligibility ages for Social Security and Medicare? Should government continue to run a railroad (Amtrak)? Are we undertaxed? Do farmers need to be so heavily Âsubsidized?
His concerns about high levels of debt are:
First: As government debt piles up, it increasingly crowds out private investment. This, in turn, weakens productivity growth, which is a major source of higher living standards. With interest rates now so low, this doesn’t seem a problem — which is why it is.
Second: The truly scary possibility is a run on the dollar. If huge budget deficits subvert global confidence in the dollar — causing investors to dump the currency — restoring that confidence might require deep cuts in federal spending and steep increases in taxes.
The first is not materializing. If there were a crowding out effect, you would expect private borrowing to decrease as public borrowing increases. That isn’t happening.
Regarding the second, you might be interested in the Treasury Department’s chart here. I realize that these things can happen very suddenly but I don’t see any signs of a run on the dollar and President Trump’s last budget should certainly have produced some effect. The point that chart really makes to me is that it’s very, very clear that Japan and China are up to something. They are holding far too much in the way of Treasuries. Unless they are, in fact, boosting their foreign trade by buying up large amounts of Treasuries, I see little explanation. Compare them with Germany.
If there is any concern about public debt the target of that concern should be state and local governments. After all, state and local debt accounts for about half of the total public debt as a proportion of GDP.







Full disclosure: I know nothing about this.
Never stopped me before, so who buys treasuries? Pension funds would be first on my list. Japan’s high savings rate and aging population is no secret.
Other that buying a lot of US treasuries, China and Japan have little in common and they for certain are not acting in concert as they don’t like each other at all.
China’s banking system is a mystery to me. Like the US they can create all the domestic credit they want, but they should have to buy US treasury’s with dollars. Which they get from exports to the US, and probably only need for Saudi oil, the rest they use for long term US treasuries. Pick that apart.
Its not a pressing issue right now, but the debt is projected by CBO to stay at over 4% of GDP for the next 10 years. It has never stayed over 4% for more than 6 years in a row before, and this is with the best economy ever.
https://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2020/01/cbo-projection-annual-budget-deficit-to.html
Steve
New GDP numbers are out. GDP up 2.3 % for 2019. The Trump economy (GDP) is averaging, if I did the math OK, about 0.2% better than the Obama economy, at the price of major increase in deficits. Tell me again why this is such a great economy? Just what is the deregulation accomplishing?
https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/01/chart-of-the-day-gdp-growth-ends-2019-on-ho-hum-note/
Steve